Accès libre

Between Originalism and Living Constitution – Jack M. Balkin Concept of Interpretation of the Constitution

À propos de cet article

Citez

Balkin J.M., Abortion and Original Meaning, „Constitutional Commentary” 2007, vol. 29. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M., Living Originalism. Cambridge–London 2011. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M., Nine Perspectives on Living Originalism, „University of Illinois Law Review” 2012, vol. 815. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M., Must We Be Faithful to Original Meaning?, „Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies” 2013, vol. 57. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M., The American Constitution as Our Law, „Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities” 2013, vol. 25. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M., The Cycles of Constitutional Time, Oxford 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M., The Framework Model and Constitutional Interpretation, w: D. Dyzenhaus, M. Thor-burn (red.), Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law, Oxford 2016. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M., The New Originalism and the Uses of History, „Fordham Law Review” 2013, vol. 82. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M., The Roots of the Living Constitution, „Boston University Law Review” 2012, vol. 92. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M., Why Are Americans Originalist?, w: D. Schaff, R. Nobles (red.), Law, Society and Community: Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell, London 2014. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M. (ed.), What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said, New Haven–London 2020. Search in Google Scholar

Balkin J.M., Siegel R., Principles, Practices and Social Movements, „University of Pennsylvania Law Review” 2006, vol. 154. Search in Google Scholar

Banaszak B., Bernaczyk M., Aktywizm sędziowski we współczesnym państwie demokratycznym, Warszawa 2012. Search in Google Scholar

Barber S., Flaming J., Constitutional Interpretation. The Basic Questions, Oxford 2007. Search in Google Scholar

Barnet R.E., Interpretation and Construction, „Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper” 2011, vol. 12. Search in Google Scholar

Bennett R.W., Solum L.B., Constitutional Originalism. A Debate, Ithaca–London 2011. Search in Google Scholar

Bodenhamer D.J., The Revolutionary Constitution, Oxford 2013. Search in Google Scholar

Brest P., The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding, w: S. Levinson, S. Mailloux (red.), Interpreting Law and Literature, Chicago 1991. Search in Google Scholar

Colby T.B., Smith P.J., Living Originalism, „Duke Law Journal” 2009, vol. 59. Search in Google Scholar

Dworkin R., Biorąc prawa poważnie, Warszawa 1998. Search in Google Scholar

Dworkin R., Imperium prawa, Warszawa 2006. Search in Google Scholar

Dworkin R., Law as Interpretation, „Texas Law Review” 1982, vol. 60. Search in Google Scholar

Fleming J.E., The Balkanization of Originalism, „Maryland Law Review” 2007, vol. 67. Search in Google Scholar

Fleming J.E., The Balkinization of Originalism, „University of Illinois Law Review” 2012, nr 3. Search in Google Scholar

Gizbert-Studnicki T., Originalizm i Living Constitutionalism a koncepcja państwa prawnego, w: P. Kardas, T. Sroka, W. Wróbel (red.), Państwo prawa i prawo karne. Księga Jubileuszowa Profesora Andrzeja Zolla, t. I, Warszawa 2012. Search in Google Scholar

Gicquel J., Gicquel J.É., Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques, Paryż 2007. Search in Google Scholar

Goldsworthy J., Constitutional Cultures, Democracy, Implications, and Underlying Principles, „University of Illinois Law Review” 2012, nr 3. Search in Google Scholar

Greenawald K., A Pluralist Approach to Interpretation; Wills and Contracts, „San Diego Law Review” 2005, vol. 42. Search in Google Scholar

Grey T.C., The Constitution as Scripture, „Stanford Law Review” 1984, vol. 27. Search in Google Scholar

Griffin S., American Constitutionalism. From Theory to Politics, Princeton 1996. Search in Google Scholar

Hamed A.S., Das Prinzip der Gewaltenteilung und die Beaufsichtigung der Regierung durch das Parlament, Berlin 1957. Search in Google Scholar

Hutchens J.T., A New Textualism: Why Textualists Should Not Be Originalists, „Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy” 2006–2007, vol. 16. Search in Google Scholar

Laidler P., Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki: od prawa do polityki, Kraków 2011. Search in Google Scholar

Levinson S., Balkin J.M., Democracy and Dysfunction, Chicago–London 2019. Search in Google Scholar

Levinson S., Mailloux S. (red.), Interpreting Law and Literature, Chicago 1991. Search in Google Scholar

Lis-Staranowicz D., Legitymizacja sądowej kontroli prawa w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki, Olsztyn 2012. Search in Google Scholar

Maroń G., Oryginalizm Antonina Scalii jako teoria wykładni prawa, „Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego” 2010, nr 4. Search in Google Scholar

Medina B., „Foundational” Originalism? On Jack Balkin’s „Living Originalism”, „Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies” 2013, vol. 7. Search in Google Scholar

Miller A.S., Democratic Dictatorship. The Emergent Constitution of Control, London 1981. Search in Google Scholar

Philipse H., Antonin Scalia’s Textualism in Philosophy, Theology, and Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution, „Utrecht Law Review” 2007, vol. 3 (2). Search in Google Scholar

Posner R.A., Law, Pragmatism and Democracy, Cambridge–London 2005. Search in Google Scholar

Scalia A., A Matter of Interpretation. Federal Courts and the Law, Princeton 1997. Search in Google Scholar

Scalia A., Judicial Adherence to The Text of Our Basic Law: A Theory of Constitutional Interpretation – przemówienie wygłoszone w Catholic University of America w dniu 18 października 1996 r. Search in Google Scholar

Scalia A., Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law, „Duke Law Journal” 1989, nr 3. Search in Google Scholar

Scheppele K.L., Jack Balkin is an American, „Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities” 2013, vol. 25. Search in Google Scholar

Siegel N.S., Jack Balkin’s Rich Historicism and Diet Originalism: Health Benefits and Risk for the Constitutional System, „Michigan Law Review” 2013, vol. 111. Search in Google Scholar

Solum L.B., Originalism and Constitutional Construction, „Fordham Law Review” 2013, vol. 82. Search in Google Scholar

Solum L.B., The Interpretation – Construction Distinction, „Constitutional Commentary” nr 27. Search in Google Scholar

Strauss D.A., The Living Constitution, Oxford 2010. Search in Google Scholar

Sunstein C.R., Virtues and Verdicts, „The New Republic” 2006, 22 maja. Search in Google Scholar

Thomas K.R., Selected Theories of Constitutional Interpretation. Congressional Research Service – Report for Congress 2011 (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41637.pdf). Search in Google Scholar

Tomza A., Spór o poprawną interpretację Konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych. Od pasywizmu do aktywizmu sądowego, Łódź 2016. Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe Ch., Judicial Activism. Bulwark of Freedom or Precarious Security?, Lanham–Oxford 1997. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2545-0271
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Law, Commercial Law, other, Law of Civil Procedure, Voluntary Jurisdiction, Public Law, Criminal Law