[
Balkin J.M., Abortion and Original Meaning, „Constitutional Commentary” 2007, vol. 29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M., Living Originalism. Cambridge–London 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M., Nine Perspectives on Living Originalism, „University of Illinois Law Review” 2012, vol. 815.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M., Must We Be Faithful to Original Meaning?, „Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies” 2013, vol. 57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M., The American Constitution as Our Law, „Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities” 2013, vol. 25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M., The Cycles of Constitutional Time, Oxford 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M., The Framework Model and Constitutional Interpretation, w: D. Dyzenhaus, M. Thor-burn (red.), Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law, Oxford 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M., The New Originalism and the Uses of History, „Fordham Law Review” 2013, vol. 82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M., The Roots of the Living Constitution, „Boston University Law Review” 2012, vol. 92.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M., Why Are Americans Originalist?, w: D. Schaff, R. Nobles (red.), Law, Society and Community: Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell, London 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M. (ed.), What Obergefell v. Hodges Should Have Said, New Haven–London 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balkin J.M., Siegel R., Principles, Practices and Social Movements, „University of Pennsylvania Law Review” 2006, vol. 154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Banaszak B., Bernaczyk M., Aktywizm sędziowski we współczesnym państwie demokratycznym, Warszawa 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barber S., Flaming J., Constitutional Interpretation. The Basic Questions, Oxford 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnet R.E., Interpretation and Construction, „Georgetown Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper” 2011, vol. 12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett R.W., Solum L.B., Constitutional Originalism. A Debate, Ithaca–London 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bodenhamer D.J., The Revolutionary Constitution, Oxford 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brest P., The Misconceived Quest for the Original Understanding, w: S. Levinson, S. Mailloux (red.), Interpreting Law and Literature, Chicago 1991.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Colby T.B., Smith P.J., Living Originalism, „Duke Law Journal” 2009, vol. 59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dworkin R., Biorąc prawa poważnie, Warszawa 1998.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dworkin R., Imperium prawa, Warszawa 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dworkin R., Law as Interpretation, „Texas Law Review” 1982, vol. 60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fleming J.E., The Balkanization of Originalism, „Maryland Law Review” 2007, vol. 67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fleming J.E., The Balkinization of Originalism, „University of Illinois Law Review” 2012, nr 3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gizbert-Studnicki T., Originalizm i Living Constitutionalism a koncepcja państwa prawnego, w: P. Kardas, T. Sroka, W. Wróbel (red.), Państwo prawa i prawo karne. Księga Jubileuszowa Profesora Andrzeja Zolla, t. I, Warszawa 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gicquel J., Gicquel J.É., Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques, Paryż 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldsworthy J., Constitutional Cultures, Democracy, Implications, and Underlying Principles, „University of Illinois Law Review” 2012, nr 3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenawald K., A Pluralist Approach to Interpretation; Wills and Contracts, „San Diego Law Review” 2005, vol. 42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grey T.C., The Constitution as Scripture, „Stanford Law Review” 1984, vol. 27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Griffin S., American Constitutionalism. From Theory to Politics, Princeton 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamed A.S., Das Prinzip der Gewaltenteilung und die Beaufsichtigung der Regierung durch das Parlament, Berlin 1957.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hutchens J.T., A New Textualism: Why Textualists Should Not Be Originalists, „Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy” 2006–2007, vol. 16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laidler P., Sąd Najwyższy Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki: od prawa do polityki, Kraków 2011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinson S., Balkin J.M., Democracy and Dysfunction, Chicago–London 2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinson S., Mailloux S. (red.), Interpreting Law and Literature, Chicago 1991.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lis-Staranowicz D., Legitymizacja sądowej kontroli prawa w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki, Olsztyn 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maroń G., Oryginalizm Antonina Scalii jako teoria wykładni prawa, „Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego” 2010, nr 4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Medina B., „Foundational” Originalism? On Jack Balkin’s „Living Originalism”, „Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies” 2013, vol. 7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller A.S., Democratic Dictatorship. The Emergent Constitution of Control, London 1981.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Philipse H., Antonin Scalia’s Textualism in Philosophy, Theology, and Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution, „Utrecht Law Review” 2007, vol. 3 (2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Posner R.A., Law, Pragmatism and Democracy, Cambridge–London 2005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scalia A., A Matter of Interpretation. Federal Courts and the Law, Princeton 1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scalia A., Judicial Adherence to The Text of Our Basic Law: A Theory of Constitutional Interpretation – przemówienie wygłoszone w Catholic University of America w dniu 18 października 1996 r.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scalia A., Judicial Deference to Administrative Interpretations of Law, „Duke Law Journal” 1989, nr 3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scheppele K.L., Jack Balkin is an American, „Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities” 2013, vol. 25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Siegel N.S., Jack Balkin’s Rich Historicism and Diet Originalism: Health Benefits and Risk for the Constitutional System, „Michigan Law Review” 2013, vol. 111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solum L.B., Originalism and Constitutional Construction, „Fordham Law Review” 2013, vol. 82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solum L.B., The Interpretation – Construction Distinction, „Constitutional Commentary” nr 27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strauss D.A., The Living Constitution, Oxford 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sunstein C.R., Virtues and Verdicts, „The New Republic” 2006, 22 maja.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thomas K.R., Selected Theories of Constitutional Interpretation. Congressional Research Service – Report for Congress 2011 (https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41637.pdf).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomza A., Spór o poprawną interpretację Konstytucji Stanów Zjednoczonych. Od pasywizmu do aktywizmu sądowego, Łódź 2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolfe Ch., Judicial Activism. Bulwark of Freedom or Precarious Security?, Lanham–Oxford 1997.
]Search in Google Scholar