Victim's Right to Prove in Criminal Proceedings

1. Criminal Law: Law of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 199/200, 08.07.1998. Criminal Law: Law of the Republic of Latvia Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 199/200, 08 07 1998 Search in Google Scholar

2. Criminal Procedural Law: Law of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 74, 11.05.2005. Criminal Procedural Law: Law of the Republic of Latvia Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 74, 11 05 2005 Search in Google Scholar

3. The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia: Law of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 43, 01.07.1993. The Constitution of the Republic of Latvia: Law of the Republic of Latvia Latvijas Vēstnesis No. 43, 01 07 1993 Search in Google Scholar

4. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council: Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. Official Journal of the European Union No. L 315/57, 14.11.2012.5. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council: Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. Official Journal of the European Union No. L 315/57, 14 11 2012 5. Search in Google Scholar

5. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 22 August 2018 in case No. 11250014115, SKK-297/2018. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 22 August 2018 in case No. 11250014115, SKK-297/2018. Search in Google Scholar

6. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 4 October 2018 in case No. 11520035214, SKK-540/2018. Decision of the Department of Criminal Cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 4 October 2018 in case No. 11520035214, SKK-540/2018. Search in Google Scholar

7. European Union glossary of terms. (2004). termini.gov.lv. Available: https://termini.gov.lv/kolekcijas/63/skirklis/491283 [rev. 28.03.2022]. European Union glossary of terms 2004 termini.gov.lv Available: https://termini.gov.lv/kolekcijas/63/skirklis/491283 [rev. 28.03.2022]. Search in Google Scholar

8. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of 12 November 2020, case archive No. K69-0609-20/26. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of 12 November 2020, case archive No. K69-0609-20/26. Search in Google Scholar

9. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of 8 October 2020 in case No. 11261093216. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of 8 October 2020 in case No. 11261093216. Search in Google Scholar

10. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of September 7, 2021 in case No. 11261045320. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of September 7, 2021 in case No. 11261045320. Search in Google Scholar

11. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of September 7, 2021 in case No. 11151013521. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of September 7, 2021 in case No. 11151013521. Search in Google Scholar

12. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of 13 October 2021 in criminal case No. 11151031621. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of 13 October 2021 in criminal case No. 11151031621. Search in Google Scholar

13. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of 5 July 2021 in criminal case No. 11261048718. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of 5 July 2021 in criminal case No. 11261048718. Search in Google Scholar

14. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of June 4, 2021, criminal case No. 11261072520. Judgement of Kurzeme District Court of June 4, 2021, criminal case No. 11261072520. Search in Google Scholar

15. Meikališa, Ā. (2013). New breezes in the protection of victims – the EU directive on the minimum standards of victims' rights and its possible impact on the criminal process in Latvia. Interpretation of rights and legal innovation – how to find the right balance: Collection of articles of the 71^st Scientific Conference of the University of Latvia. Rīga: LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 146. MeikališaĀ. 2013 New breezes in the protection of victims – the EU directive on the minimum standards of victims' rights and its possible impact on the criminal process in Latvia Interpretation of rights and legal innovation – how to find the right balance: Collection of articles of the 71^st Scientific Conference of the University of Latvia Rīga LU Akadēmiskais apgāds 146 Search in Google Scholar

16. Strada-Rozenberga, K. (2019a). Article 123. Proof, comments from the Criminal Procedural Law. Part A. In the scientific edition of Strada-Rozenberga. Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 413. Strada-RozenbergaK. 2019a Article 123. Proof, comments from the Criminal Procedural Law. Part A. In the scientific edition of Strada-Rozenberga Rīga Latvijas Vēstnesis 413 Search in Google Scholar

17. Strada-Rozenberga, K. (2019b). Article 127. Evidence, comments from the Criminal Procedural Law. Part A. In the scientific edition of Strada-Rozenberga. Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis, 430. Strada-RozenbergaK. 2019b Evidence, comments from the Criminal Procedural Law. Part A. In the scientific edition of Strada-Rozenberga Rīga Latvijas Vēstnesis 430 Search in Google Scholar

18. Strada-Rozenberga, K. (2020). Expert opinion (summary) on the adequacy of the regulation of criminal proceedings and clarity regarding the standard of proof and the adequacy of the evidence. Lrvk.gov.lv. Available: https://www.lrvk.gov.lv/lv/getrevisionfile/29451-YMmD8WDROAMMegG-4oAd27-63yFixyqh.pdf [rev. 28.03.2022.]. Strada-RozenbergaK. 2020 Expert opinion (summary) on the adequacy of the regulation of criminal proceedings and clarity regarding the standard of proof and the adequacy of the evidence Lrvk.gov.lv Available: https://www.lrvk.gov.lv/lv/getrevisionfile/29451-YMmD8WDROAMMegG-4oAd27-63yFixyqh.pdf [rev. 28.03.2022.]. Search in Google Scholar