[Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333. doi: 10.1177/0149206314527128.10.1177/0149206314527128]Search in Google Scholar
[Andreoni, A., & Scazzieri, R. (2014). Triggers of change: structural trajectories and production dynamics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(6), 1391–1408. doi: 10.1093/cje/bet034.10.1093/cje/bet034]Search in Google Scholar
[Argote, L. (2012). Organizational learning: creating, retaining and transferring knowledge (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arthur, M.B., Inkson, K., & Pringle, J.K. (1999). The new careers: individual action and economic change. Thousand Oaks, CA; London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ashkenas, R. (2013). Change management needs to change. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2013/04/change-management-needs-to-cha]Search in Google Scholar
[Ates, A., & Bititci, U. (2011). Change process: a key enabler for building resilient SMEs. International Journal of Production Research, 49(18), 5601–5618. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.563825.10.1080/00207543.2011.563825]Search in Google Scholar
[Badurdeen, F., Marksberry, P., Gregory, B., & Kreafle, K. (2010). Management directed kaizen: Toyota’s Jishuken process for management development. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(6), 670–686. doi: 10.1108/17410381011063987.10.1108/17410381011063987]Search in Google Scholar
[Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: the implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1102–1119. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0470.10.5465/amj.2009.0470]Search in Google Scholar
[Barabasz, A., & Bełz, G. (2014). Reaction to organisational change: the psychodynamic perspective. In Şişcan, Z., Łyszczarz, H., & Machaczka, K.. (Eds.), Management Science in Transition Period in Moldova and Poland: Responsible Use of Resources (pp.27–36). Cracow, Poland: Cracow University of Economics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: a contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398. doi: 10.5465/amj.2009.0891.10.5465/amj.2009.0891]Search in Google Scholar
[Battram, A. (1999). Navigating complexity: the essential guide to complexity theory in business and management. London, UK: Industrial Society.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumgartner, F.R., Jones, B.D., & Mortensen, P.B. (2014). Punctuated-equilibrium theory: explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In Sabatier, P.A. & Weible, C.M. (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp.59–103). Boulder: Westview Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beach, D.S. (1980). Personnel: the management of people at work (4th ed.). New York, NY: Collier Macmillan Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beckhard, R. (1969). Organization development: strategies and models. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blom, T. (2018). Organisational wellness: human reaction to change. South African Journal of Business Management, 49(1), 1-10. doi: 10.4102/sajbm.v49i1.2.10.4102/sajbm.v49i1.2]Search in Google Scholar
[Boulding, K.E. (1981). Evolutionary economics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boushey, G. (2012). Punctuated equilibrium theory and the diffusion of innovations. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 127–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00437.x.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00437.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyer, R., & Saillard, Y. (2002). Théorie de la régulation: l’état des savoirs [Theory of regulation: the state of knowledge]. Paris: Découverte.10.3917/dec.boyer.2002.01]Search in Google Scholar
[Brännmark, M., & Benn, S. (2012). A proposed model for evaluating the sustainability of continuous change programmes. Journal of Change Management, 12(2), 231–245. doi: 10.1080/14697017.2012.672449.10.1080/14697017.2012.672449]Search in Google Scholar
[Brătianu, C. (2016). Knowledge dynamics. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 4(3), 323–337.]Search in Google Scholar
[Breslin, D. (2016). What evolves in organizational co-evolution? Journal of Management & Governance, 20(1), 45–67. doi: 10.1007/s10997-014-9302-0.10.1007/s10997-014-9302-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Bridges, W. (2004). Transitions: making sense of life’s changes (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Lifelong Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brower, A.M., & Nurius, P.S. (1993). Social cognition and individual change: current theory and counseling guidelines. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, S.L., & Eisenhardt, K.M. (1997). The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34. doi: 10.2307/2393807.10.2307/2393807]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckley, W.F. (1968). Modern systems research for the behavioral scientist: a sourcebook. Chicago, IL: Aldine Pub. Co.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burnes, B. (2000). Managing change: a strategic approach to organisational dynamics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burns, T., & Stalker, G.M. (2011). Mechanistic and organic systems of management. In Godwyn, M. & Gittell, J.H. (Eds.), Sociology of Organizations: Structures and Relationships (pp.14–18). Thousand Oaks, CA; London: Pine Forge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Butler, G.V. (1986). Organization and management. London, UK: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[By, R.T., Burnes, B., & Oswick, C. (2012). Change management: leadership, values and ethics. Journal of Change Management, 12(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1080/14697017.2011.652371.10.1080/14697017.2011.652371]Search in Google Scholar
[Carroll, S.J., & Gillen, D.J. (1987). Are the classical management functions useful in describing managerial work? The Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 38–51. doi: 10.5465/amr.1987.4306460.10.5465/amr.1987.4306460]Search in Google Scholar
[Carter, M.Z., Armenakis, A.A., Feild, H.S., & Mossholder, K.W. (2013). Transformational leadership, relationship quality, and employee performance during continuous incremental organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(7), 942–958. doi: 10.1002/job.1824.10.1002/job.1824]Search in Google Scholar
[Choi, M., & Ruona, W. E. A. (2011). Individual readiness for organizational change and its implications for human resource and organization development. Human Resource Development Review, 10(1), 46–73. doi: 10.1177/1534484310384957.10.1177/1534484310384957]Search in Google Scholar
[Coghlan, D., & Shani, A. B. (2017). Inquiring in the present tense: the dynamic mechanism of action research. Journal of Change Management, 17(2), 121–137. doi: 10.1080/14697017.2017.1301045.10.1080/14697017.2017.1301045]Search in Google Scholar
[Collins, L.K., & Hill, F.M. (1998). Leveraging organizational transformation through incremental and radical approaches to change: three case studies. Total Quality Management, 9(4–5), 30–34. doi: 10.1080/0954412988505.10.1080/0954412988505]Search in Google Scholar
[Conner, D. (1993). Managing at the speed of change: how resilient managers succeed and prosper where others fail. New York, NY: Villard Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coriat, B., & Dosi, G. (2002). Évolutionnisme et régulation: différences et convergences [Evolutionism and regulation: differences and convergences]. Paris: La Découverte.]Search in Google Scholar
[Coriat, B., & Weinstein, O. (1995). Les nouvelles théories de l’entreprise [The new theories of the firm]. Paris: LGF.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crossan, M.M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dahl, J. (2014). Conceptualizing coopetition as a process: an outline of change in cooperative and competitive interactions. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(2), 272–279. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.002.10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Davis, J.P. (2016). The group dynamics of interorganizational relationships: collaborating with multiple partners in innovation ecosystems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(4), 621–661. DOI: 10.1177/0001839216649350.10.1177/0001839216649350]Search in Google Scholar
[De Stefano, V. (2015). The rise of the just-in-time workforce: on-demand work, crowd work, and-labor protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37, 471-522. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2682602.10.2139/ssrn.2682602]Search in Google Scholar
[Drucker, P.F. (1986). Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles. New York, NY: Harper & Row.]Search in Google Scholar
[Edelman, L.F., & Benning, A.L. (2004). Incremental revolution: Organizational change in highly turbulent environments. Comportamento Organizacional E Gestão, 10(1), 107-122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Euroconsult (1984). Les bonzai de l’industrie japonaise: éléments de réflexion sur l’intégration de la technologie dans la fonction stratégique des entreprises Japonaises: étude réalisée [The Bonzai of Japanese industry: elements of reflection on the integration of technology into the strategic function of Japanese companies: carried out study]. Paris, France: Ministère de l’industrie et de la recherche.]Search in Google Scholar
[Forsyth, D.R. (2019). Group dynamics (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedkin, N.E., & Johnsen, E.C. (2014). Social influence network theory: a sociological examination of small group dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[García, J.L., Maldonado, A.A., Alvarado, A., & Rivera, D.G. (2014). Human critical success factors for kaizen and its impacts in industrial performance. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 70(9), 2187–2198. doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5445-4.10.1007/s00170-013-5445-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Georgalis, J., Samaratunge, R., Kimberley, N., & Lu, Y. (2015). Change process characteristics and resistance to organisational change: the role of employee perceptions of justice. Australian Journal of Management, 40(1), 89–113. doi: 10.1177/0312896214526212.10.1177/0312896214526212]Search in Google Scholar
[Geus, A. (2002). The living company. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenberg, J., & Baron, R.A. (2014). Behavior in organizations. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hadad, S. (2017). Knowledge economy: characteristics and dimensions. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 5(2), 203–225. doi: 10.25019/MDKE/5.2.03.10.25019/MDKE/5.2.03]Search in Google Scholar
[Hechanova, R.M., & Cementina-Olpoc, R. (2013). Transformational leadership, change management, and commitment to change: a comparison of academic and business organizations. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 11–19. doi: 10.1007/s40299-012-0019-z.10.1007/s40299-012-0019-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., Chen, C., & Sacramento, C.A. (2011). How does bureaucracy impact individual creativity? A cross-level investigation of team contextual influences on goal orientation–creativity relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 624–641. doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.61968124.10.5465/amj.2011.61968124]Search in Google Scholar
[Hodgson, G.M. (2013). Understanding organizational evolution: toward a research agenda using generalized Darwinism. Organization Studies, 34(7), 973–992. doi: 10.1177/0170840613485855.10.1177/0170840613485855]Search in Google Scholar
[Holten, A.-L., & Brenner, S.O. (2015). Leadership style and the process of organizational change. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(1), 2–16. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0155.10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0155]Search in Google Scholar
[Humphreys, K.K. (2011). Toyota production system: an integrated approach to Just-In-Time. New York, NY: Productivity Press.10.1201/b11731]Search in Google Scholar
[Jackson, K., & Tomioka, M. (2004). The changing face of Japanese Management. London, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9780203633830]Search in Google Scholar
[Jain, A. (2013). Radical change to organizational knowledge through the accumulation of incremental changes. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), 12144-12144. doi: 10.5465/ambpp.2013.12144abstract.10.5465/ambpp.2013.12144abstract]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaros, S. (2010). Commitment to organizational change: a critical review. Journal of Change Management, 10(1), 79–108. doi: 10.1080/14697010903549457.10.1080/14697010903549457]Search in Google Scholar
[Järventie-Thesleff, R., Moisander, J., & Villi, M. (2014). The strategic challenge of continuous change in multi-platform media organizations—A strategy-as-practice perspective. International Journal on Media Management, 16(3–4), 123–138. doi: 10.1080/14241277.2014.919920.10.1080/14241277.2014.919920]Search in Google Scholar
[Jick, T. (1993). Managing change: cases and concepts. Homewood, IL: Irwin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation, organizational learning, and performance. Journal of Business Research, 64(4), 408–417. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010.10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.09.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Joyce, B. (1982). Organizational homeostasis and innovation: tightening the loose couplings. Education and Urban Society, 15(1), 42–69. doi: 10.1177/0013124582015001004.10.1177/0013124582015001004]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplinsky, R., & Posthuma, A. (2013). Easternization: the spread of Japanese management techniques to developing countries. London, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9780203724828]Search in Google Scholar
[Kauffman, S.A. (1993). The origins of order: self-organization and selection in evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelly, K. (1995). Out of control: the new biology of machines, social systems, & the economic world. Reading, MA: Basic Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelly, K. (1999). New rules for the new economy: 10 radical strategies for a connected world. New York, NY: Penguin Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelly, K. (2011). What technology wants. New York, NY: Penguin Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelly, K. (2017). The inevitable: understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our future. New York, NY: Penguin Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kitana, D.A. (2016). Overview of the managerial thoughts and theories from the history: classical management theory to modern management theory. Indian Journal of Management Science, 6(1), 16–21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kohler, W. (2015). The task of Gestalt psychology. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400868964]Search in Google Scholar
[Kotter, J.P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuipers, B.S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Voet, J.V.D. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: a literature review. Public Administration, 92(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1111/padm.12040.10.1111/padm.12040]Search in Google Scholar
[LaMarsh, J. (1995). Changing the way we change: gaining control of major operational change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Langley, A., & Sloan, P. (2011). Organizational change and dialectic process. In Boje, D., Burnes, B., & Hassard, J. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Organizational Change (pp.261–275). Cambridge, MA: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Laudicina, P.A., & Peterson, E.R. (2016). From globalization to islandization. Retrieved from https://www.atkearney.com/web/global-business-policy-council/article?/a/from-globalization-to-islandization.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levi, D.J. (2016). Group dynamics for teams (5th ed.). Los Angeles, LA: SAGE Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: selected papers on group dynamics. New York, NY: Harper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewin, K., & Cartwright, D. (1952). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers. London, UK: Tavistock Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lifton, W.M., & Zimpfer, D.G. (1972). Groups: facilitating individual growth and societal change. New York, NY: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lordon, F. (1993). Irrégularités des trajectoires de croissance: évolutions et dynamique non-linéaire: vers une schématisation de l’endométabolisme [Irregularities of growth trajectories: evolutions and nonlinear dynamics: towards a schematization of endometabolism]. Paris, France: EHESS.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lowry, R. (2017). The evolution of psychological theory: a critical history of concepts and presuppositions. London, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9781315131894]Search in Google Scholar
[Mackelprang, A.W., & Nair, A. (2010). Relationship between just-in-time manufacturing practices and performance: a meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Operations Management, 28(4), 283–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.002.10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Mahmood, Z., & Basharat, M. (2012). Review of classical management theories. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 2(1), 512–522.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marques Simoes, P.M., & Esposito, M. (2014). Improving change management: how communication nature influences resistance to change. Journal of Management Development, 33(4), 324–341. doi: 10.1108/JMD-05-2012-0058.10.1108/JMD-05-2012-0058]Search in Google Scholar
[Maybury, M. (2002). Knowledge management: classic and contemporary works. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[McAdam, R. (2003). Radical change: a conceptual model for research agendas. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(4), 226–235. doi: 10.1108/01437730310478093.10.1108/01437730310478093]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, C., & Davis, S. M. (2003). It’s alive: the coming convergence of information, biology, and business. New York, NY: Crown Business.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, D. (1984). Organizations: a quantum view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Miller, E.J., & Rice, A.K. (1967). Systems of organization. Oxford, UK: Tavistock.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, J. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morabito, J., Sack, I., & Bhate, A. (2018). The basics of design in the knowledge era: dialectic and synthesis. In Morabito, J., Sack, I., & Bhate, A. (Eds.), Designing knowledge organizations: a pathway to innovation leadership (pp.74–77). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2011). Proactive R&D management and firm growth: a punctuated equilibrium model. Research Policy, 40(3), 429–440. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.014.10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Naranjo-Valencia, J.C., Sanz-Valle, R., & Jiménez-Jiménez, D. (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Management Decision, 49(1), 55–72. doi: 10.1108/00251741111094437.10.1108/00251741111094437]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, R.R., & Winter, S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niculescu, D. (2015). Key features in knowledge-driven companies. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 45–60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2015). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. In Edwards, J.S. (Ed.), The Essentials of Knowledge Management (pp.95–110). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Norrie, A. (2009). Dialectic and difference: dialectical critical realism and the grounds of justice. Florence, Italy: Routledge.10.4324/9780203865934]Search in Google Scholar
[Park, C., Vertinsky, I., & Becerra, M. (2015). Transfers of tacit vs. explicit knowledge and performance in international joint ventures: The role of age. International Business Review, 24(1), 89–101. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.06.004.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.06.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Parker, L.D., & Lewis, N.R. (1995). Classical management control in contemporary management and accounting: the persistence of Taylor and Fayol’s world. Accounting, Business & Financial History, 5(2), 211–236. doi: 10.1080/09585209500000040.10.1080/09585209500000040]Search in Google Scholar
[Pavlov, I.P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes; an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. London, UK: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Penrose, E.T. (1952). Biological analogies in the theory of the firm. The American Economic Review, 42(5), 804–819.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peter, B. (2008). Tacit knowledge in organizational learning. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinto, I.R., Marques, J.M., Levine, J.M., & Abrams, D. (2016). Membership role and subjective group dynamics: impact on evaluative intragroup differentiation and commitment to prescriptive norms. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(5), 570–590. doi: 10.1177/1368430216638531.10.1177/1368430216638531]Search in Google Scholar
[Phillips, J.R. (1983). Enhancing the effectiveness of organizational change management. Human Resource Management, 22(1–2), 183–199. doi: 10.1002/hrm.3930220125.10.1002/hrm.3930220125]Search in Google Scholar
[Raineri, A.B. (2011). Change management practices: impact on perceived change results. Journal of Business Research, 64(3), 266–272. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.11.011.10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.11.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramis-Pujol, J., Suárez-Barraza, M.F., & Kerbache, L. (2011). Thoughts on kaizen and its evolution: three different perspectives and guiding principles. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2(4), 288–308. doi: 10.1108/20401461111189407.10.1108/20401461111189407]Search in Google Scholar
[Ranjan Kumar, M. (2013). Insider action research: premises and promises. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(1), 169–189. doi: 10.1108/09534811311307969.10.1108/09534811311307969]Search in Google Scholar
[Rees, G., & Rumbles, S. (2012). Continuous organizational change and burnout. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 11, 1–16. doi: 10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v11i03/50128.10.18848/1447-9524/CGP/v11i03/50128]Search in Google Scholar
[Reeve, R., Baird, K., & Jia Hu, K. (2011). The relationships between organizational culture, total quality management practices and operational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(7), 789–814. doi: 10.1108/01443571111144850.10.1108/01443571111144850]Search in Google Scholar
[Reichert, R. (1970). Self-awareness through group dynamics. Dayton, OH: Pflaum/Standard.]Search in Google Scholar
[Richard, F. (2014). Managing open systems. London, UK: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T. (2011). Organizational behavior. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Robert, V., Yoguel, G., & Lerena, O. (2017). The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 27(4), 761–793. doi: 10.1007/s00191-017-0512-x.10.1007/s00191-017-0512-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanford, R.N. (1969). Self and society: social change and individual development. New York, NY: Atherton Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scazzieri, R. (2018). Structural dynamics and evolutionary change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 46, 52–58. doi: 10.1016/j.strueco.2018.03.007.10.1016/j.strueco.2018.03.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, W.R. (1987). Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems. London, UK: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, W.R., & Davis, G.F. (2017). Organizations and organizing: rational, natural and open systems perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, J.M. (1982). Introducing organizational behaviour. London, UK: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-16833-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Spaho, K. (2013). Organizational communication and conflict management. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 18(1), 103–118.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spencer, B.A. (1994). Models of organization and total quality management: a comparison and critical evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 446–471. doi: 10.5465/amr.1994.9412271807.10.5465/amr.1994.9412271807]Search in Google Scholar
[Steigenberger, N. (2015). Emotions in sensemaking: a change management perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 28(3), 432–451. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-05-2014-0095.10.1108/JOCM-05-2014-0095]Search in Google Scholar
[Stensaker, I.G., & Langley, A. (2010). Change management choices and trajectories in a multidivisional firm. British Journal of Management, 21(1), 7–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00657.x.10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00657.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Stewart, P. (1996). Beyond Japanese management: the end of modern times? London, UK: Cass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Strebel, P. (1996). Why do employees resist change? Harvard Business Review, 74(3), 86-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Suddaby, R., & Foster, W.M. (2017). History and organizational change. Journal of Management, 43(1), 19–38. doi: 10.1177/0149206316675031.10.1177/0149206316675031]Search in Google Scholar
[Sundel, M. (1985). Individual change through small groups. New York, NY: The Free Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Susanto, E., & Shih, H. (2010). Conflict management styles, emotional intelligence, and job performance in public organizations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(2), 147–168. doi: 10.1108/10444061011037387.10.1108/10444061011037387]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, R., Sargent, L.D., & Hardy, C. (2010). Managing organizational change: negotiating meaning and power-resistance relations. Organization Science, 22(1), 22–41. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0520.10.1287/orsc.1090.0520]Search in Google Scholar
[Valentinov, V. (2015). Kenneth Boulding’s theories of evolutionary economics and organizational change: a reconstruction. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(1), 71–88. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2015.1013880.10.1080/00213624.2015.1013880]Search in Google Scholar
[van Witteloostuijn, A., Jacobs, G., & Christe-Zeyse, J. (2013). A theoretical framework of organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(5), 772–792. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-09-2012-0137.10.1108/JOCM-09-2012-0137]Search in Google Scholar
[Venkitachalam, K., & Busch, P. (2012). Tacit knowledge: review and possible research directions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(2), 357–372. doi: 10.1108/13673271211218915.10.1108/13673271211218915]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlados, C. (2004). La dynamique du triangle stratégie, technologie et management : l’insertion des entreprises Grecques dans la globalisation [The dynamics of the triangle of strategy, technology, and management: the integration of Greek firms into globalization]. Paris, France: Paris X Nanterre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlados, C. (2005). The insertion of Greek firms into globalization: the dynamics of the triangle of strategy, technology and management. Presented at the Managing Global Trends and Challenges in a Turbulent Economy, University of the Aegean, Department of Business Administration. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3218009.10.2139/ssrn.3218009]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlados, C. (2012). The search of competitiveness and the entrepreneurial evolution in a global environment: toward a new approach of development dynamics based on the case of Greek productive system. Journal of Management Sciences and Regional Development, 8, 91–116. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3218008.10.2139/ssrn.3218008]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlados, C., Deniozos, N., & Chatzinikolaou, D. (2018). The possible paths of a new globalization. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(9), 2310–2333.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlados, C., Deniozos, N., Chatzinikolaou, D., & Demertzis, M. (2018a). Perceiving competitiveness under the restructuring process of globalization. International Journal of Business and Management, 13(8), 135-153. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v13n8p135.10.5539/ijbm.v13n8p135]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlados, C., Deniozos, N., Chatzinikolaou, D., & Demertzis, M. (2018b). Towards an evolutionary understanding of the current global socio-economic crisis and restructuring: from a conjunctural to a structural and evolutionary perspective. Research in World Economy, 9(1), 15–33. doi: 10.5430/rwe.v9n1p15.10.5430/rwe.v9n1p15]Search in Google Scholar
[Vlados, C., Katimertzopoulos, F., & Blatsos, I. (2019). Innovation in Stra.Tech.Man (strategy-technology-management) terms. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, 5(2), 1-26. doi: 10.5296/jebi.v5i2.13477.10.5296/jebi.v5i2.13477]Search in Google Scholar
[Vora, M. (2013). Business excellence through sustainable change management. The TQM Journal, 25(6), 625–640. doi: 10.1108/TQM-07-2013-0080.10.1108/TQM-07-2013-0080]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, A. (2007). Robustness and evolvability in living systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waller, M.J., Okhuysen, G.A., & Saghafian, M. (2016). Conceptualizing emergent states: a strategy to advance the study of group dynamics. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 561–598. doi: 10.5465/19416520.2016.1120958.10.5465/19416520.2016.1120958]Search in Google Scholar
[Warmington, A., Lupton, T., & Gribbin, C. (1977). Organizational behaviour and performance: an open systems approach to change. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-03088-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Whelan-Berry, K.S., & Somerville, K.A. (2010). Linking change drivers and the organizational change process: a review and synthesis. Journal of Change Management, 10(2), 175–193. doi: 10.1080/14697011003795651.10.1080/14697011003795651]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolfe, R.A. (1994). Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions. Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), 405–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00624.x.10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00624.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Worley, C.G., & Mohrman, S.A. (2014). Is change management obsolete? Organizational Dynamics, 43(3), 214–224. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2014.08.008.10.1016/j.orgdyn.2014.08.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Zehir, C., Ertosun, Ö.G., Zehir, S., & Müceldilli, B. (2012). Total quality management practices’ effects on quality performance and innovative performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.031.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.031]Search in Google Scholar
[Zeleny, M. (1980). Autopoiesis, a theory of living organizations. New York, NY: Elsevier Science Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, X., Cao, Q., & Tjosvold, D. (2011). Linking transformational leadership and team performance: a conflict management approach. Journal of Management Studies, 48(7), 1586–1611. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00974.x.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00974.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Y., Liang, Q., & Fan, P. (2017). Strategic core change, faultlines and team flux: insight from punctuated equilibrium model. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30(1), 54–75. doi: 10.1108/JOCM-01-2016-0003.10.1108/JOCM-01-2016-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Zollo, M., Cennamo, C., & Neumann, K. (2013). Beyond what and why: understanding organizational evolution towards sustainable enterprise models. Organization & Environment, 26(3), 241–259. doi: 10.1177/1086026613496433.10.1177/1086026613496433]Search in Google Scholar