[Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J. P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulink, H. & Matthysen, E. (2003). The application of least-cost modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64: 233-247.]Search in Google Scholar
[Awade, M., Metzger, J. P. (2008). Using gap-crossing capacity to evaluate functional connectivity of two Atlantic rainforest birds and their response to fragmentation. Austral Ecology, 33: 863-871.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bailey, D., Billeter, R., Aviron, S., Schweiger, O. & Herzog, F. (2007). The influence of thematic resolution on metric selection for biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 22: 461-473.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bailey, D., Schmidt-Entling, M. H., Eberhardt, P., Herrmann, J., Hofer, G., Kormann, U. & Herzog, F. (2010). Effects of habitat amount and isolation on biodiversity in fragmented traditional orchards. Journal of Applied Ecology (in press).10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01858.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Baskent, E. Z., Jordan, G. A. (1995). Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25: 1830-1849.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bélisle, M., Desrochers, A. (2002). Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: An empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models. Landscape Ecology, 17: 219-231.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bennett, A. F., Hinsley, S. A., Bellamy, P. E., Swetnam, R. D. & Mac Nally, R. (2004). Do regional gradients in land-use influence richness, composition and turnover of bird assemblages in small woods? Biological Conservation, 119: 191-206.10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Billeter, R., Liira, J., Bailey, D., Bugter, R., Arens, P., Augenstein, I., Aviron, S., Baudry, J., Bukacek, R., Burel, F., Cerny, M., De Blust, G., De Cock, R., Diekötter, T., Dietz, H., Dirksen, J., Dormann, C., Durka, W., Frenzel, M., Hamersky, R., Hendricky, F., Herzog, F., Klotz, S., Koolstra, B., Lausch, A., Le Coeur, D., Maelfait, J. P., Opdam, P., Roubalova, M., Schermann, A., Schermann, N., Schmidt, T., Schweiger, O., Smulders, M. J. M., Speelmans, M., Simova, P., Verboom, J., Van Wingerden, W. K. R. E., Zobel, M. & Edwards, P. J. (2008). Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. A pan-European study. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 141-150.]Search in Google Scholar
[Böhning-Gaese, K., González-Guzmán & Brown, H. J. (1998). Constraints on dispersal and the evolution of the avifauna of the Northern Hemisphere. Evolutionary Ecology, 12: 767-783.]Search in Google Scholar
[Broquet, T., Ray, N., Petit, E., Fryxell, J. M. & Burel, F. (2006). Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana). Landscape Ecology, 21: 877-889.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bunn, A. G., Urban, D. L. & Keitt, T. H. (2000). Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 59: 265-278.]Search in Google Scholar
[Calabrese, J. M., Fagan, W. F. (2004). A comparison-shoppers's guide to connectivity metrics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(10): 529-536.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chardon, J. P., Adriaensen, F. & Matthysen, E. (2003). Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure. A case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.). Landscape Ecology, 18: 561-573.]Search in Google Scholar
[Desrochers, A., Hannon, S. J. (1997). Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conservation Biology, 11: 1204-1210.]Search in Google Scholar
[Driezen, K., Adriaensen, F., Rondinini, C., Doncaster, P. & Matthysen, E. (2007). Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Ecological Modelling, 209: 314-322.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ewers, R. M., Didham, R. K. (2006). Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews, 81: 687-699.]Search in Google Scholar
[Forman, R. T. T., Godron, M. (1986). Landscape Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gillies, C. S., Clair, C. C. S. (2008). Riparian corridors enhance movement of a forest specialist bird in fragmented tropical forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Volume: 105, Issue: 50, pp. 19774-19779.10.1073/pnas.0803530105260499019017794]Search in Google Scholar
[Glutz von Blotzheim, U. N. (1997). Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Band 11-14, Passeriformes. Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodwin, B. J. (2003). Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable? Landscape Ecology, 18: 687-699.10.1023/B:LAND.0000004184.03500.a8]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodwin, B. J., Fahrig, L. (2002). How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity. Oikos, 99: 552-570.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greegan, H. P., Osborne, P. E. (2005). Gap-crossing decisions of woodland songbirds in Scottland: an experimental approach. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42: 678-687.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haas, C. A. (1995). Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology, 9: 845-854.]Search in Google Scholar
[Herzog, F., Dreier, S., Hofer, G., Marfurt, C., Schüpbach, B., Spiess, M. & Walter, T. (2005). Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and breeding bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 108: 189-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keitt, T. H., Urban, D. L. & Milne, B. T. (1997). Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Ecology (1/1). Retrieved May 2009, from http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art4/ http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art4/10.5751/ES-00015-010104]Search in Google Scholar
[Kindlmann, P., Burel, F. (2008). Connectivity measures. A review. Landscape Ecology, 23: 879-890.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kleijn, D., Baquero, R. A., Clough, Y., Díaz, M., De Esteban, J., Fernández, F., Gabriel, D., Herzog, F., Holzschuh, A., Jöhl, R., Knop, E., Kruess, A., Marhsall, E. J. P., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T., Verhulst, J., West, T. M. & Yela, J. L. (2006). Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecology Letters, 9: 243-254.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mac Nally, R., Horrocks, G. (2000). Landscape-scale conservation of an endangered migrant: the Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor in its winter range. Biological Conservation, 92: 335-343.]Search in Google Scholar
[Magle, S. B., Theobald, D. M. & Crooks, K. R. (2009). A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA. Landscape Ecology, 24: 267-280.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matthysen, E., Adriaensen, F. & Dhondt, A. A. (2001). Local recruitment of great and blue tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) in relation to study plot size and degree of isolation. Ecography, 24: 33-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pope, S. E., Fahrig, L. & Merriam, H. G. (2000). Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology, 81: 2498-2508.]Search in Google Scholar
[R Development Core Team (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved 2009-10-15, from http://www.R-project.org]Search in Google Scholar
[Radford, J. Q., Bennett, A. F. (2007). The relative importance of landscape properties for woodland birds in agricultural environments. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44: 737-747.]Search in Google Scholar
[Radford, J. Q., Bennett, A. F. & Cheers, G. J. (2005). Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds. Biological Conservation, 124: 317-337.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, M. H., Thies, C., Nentwig, W. & Tscharntke, T. (2008). Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales. Journal of Biogeography, 35: 157-166.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, C., Fry, G. (2005). Estimating the consequences of land-use changes on butterfly diversity in a marginal agricultural landscape in Sweden. Journal of Nature Conservation, 13: 247-256.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schweiger, O., Maelfait, J. P., van Wingerden, W., Hendrickx, F, Billeter, R., Speelmans, M., Augenstein, I., Aukema, B.; Aviron, S., Bailey, D., Bukacek, R., Burel, F., Diekötter, T., Dirksen, J., Frenzel, M., Herzog, F., Liira, J., Roubalova, M. & Bugter R. (2005). Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on arthropod communities in agricultural landscapes across organisational levels and spatial scales. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42: 1129-1139.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stevens, V. M., Verkenne, C., Vandewoestijne, S., Wesselingh, R. A. & Baguette, M. (2006). Gene flow and functional connectivity in the natterjack toad. Molecular Ecology, 15: 2333-2344.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K. & Merriam, G. (1993). Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos, 68: 571-573.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L. & With, K. A. (2006). Landscape connectivity. A return to the basics. Conservation Biology, 14: 29-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tischendorf, L., Fahrig, L. (2000a). How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landscape Ecology, 15: 633-641.10.1023/A:1008177324187]Search in Google Scholar
[Tischendorf, L., Fahrig, L. (2000b). On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 90: 7-19.10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Venables, W. N., Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer, New York.10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Verbeylen, G., De Bruyn, L., Adriaensen, F. & Matthysen, E. (2003). Does matrix resistance influence red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecology, 18: 791-805.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ward, M. P. (2005). The role of immigration in the decline of an isolated migratory bird population. Conservation Biology, 19: 1528-1536.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiens, J. A. (1989). Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology, 3: 385-397.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiens, J. A., Van Horne, B. & Noon, B. R. (2002). Integrating landscape structure and scale into natural resource management. In: Liu, J., Taylor, W. W. (Eds.): Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management. pp. 23-67. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511613654.005]Search in Google Scholar
[With, K. A. (2004). Metapopulation dynamics: perspectives from landscape ecology. In: Hanski, I., Gaggiotti, O. (Eds.): Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations. pp. 23-44. Academic Press, San Diego.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu, J., Shen, W., Sun, W. & Tueller, P. T. (2002). Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology, 17: 761-782.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zwygart, D. (1983). Die Vogelwelt von Nieder- und Hochstammobstkulturen des Kantons Thurgau. Der Ornithologische Beobachter, 80: 89-104.]Search in Google Scholar