[Anderson, J. R.; and Lebiere, C. 1998. The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, J. R.; Bothell, D.; Byrne, M. D.; Douglass, S.; Lebiere, C.; and Qin, Y. 2004. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review. 111(4):1036-1060.]Search in Google Scholar
[Axtell, R.; Axelrod, R.; Epstein, J.R.; and Cohen, M.D. 1996. Aligning simulation models: A case of study and results. Computational Mathematical Organization Theory. 1(2): 123-141.10.1007/BF01299065]Search in Google Scholar
[Barker, L.; Luman, E.; McCauley, M.; and Chu, S. 2002. Assessing equivalence: an alternative to the use of difference tests for measuring disparities in vaccination coverage. American Journal of Epidemiology. 156(11):1056-61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bechtel, W. 2006. Discovering cell mechanisms: The creation of modern cell biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164962]Search in Google Scholar
[Bechtel, W. 2008. Mental mechanisms: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, J. 1994. The earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist. 49(12): 997-1003.10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997]Search in Google Scholar
[Davison, A.; and Hinkley, D. 1997. Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511802843]Search in Google Scholar
[Dennett, D. 1991. Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy. 88: 27-51.10.2307/2027085]Search in Google Scholar
[Efron, B.; Tibshirani, R.J. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Erev, I.; Ert, E.; Roth, A.; Haruvy, E.; Herzog, S.; Hau, R.; Hertwig, R.; Stewart, T.; West, R.; and Lebiere, C. 2010. A choice prediction competition for choices from experience and from description. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making: Special edition on Decisions from Experience. 23(1): 15-47.10.1002/bdm.683]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonzalez, C.; and Dutt, V. 2007. Learning to control a dynamic task: A system dynamics cognitive model of the slope effect. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 61-66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gonzalez, C.; Lerch, F. J.; and Lebiere, C. 2003. Instance-based learning in real-time dynamic decision making. Cognitive Science. 27(4): 591-635.10.1207/s15516709cog2704_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Ioannidis J.P.A. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. Public Library of Science Medicine. 2(8): 124.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lebiere, C.; and West, R. L. 1999. A dynamic ACT-R model of simple games. In Proceedings of the Twenty-first Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 296-301. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410603494-57]Search in Google Scholar
[Pylyshyn, Z. 1984. Computation and cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pylyshyn, Z. 1989. Computing in Cognitive Science. In Foundations of Cognitive Science ed. M. Posner. Cambridge: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Roberts, S.; and Pashler, H. 2000. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review. 107: 358-367.10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.35810789200]Search in Google Scholar
[Ross, D. 2000. Rainforest Realism: A Dennettian Theory of Existence. In Dennett's Philosophy: A Comprehensive Assessment eds. D. Ross, D. Thompson, and A. Brook. Cambridge: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, F. 1996. Statistical significance testing and cumulative knowledge in psychology: Implications for the training of researchers. Psychological Methods. 1: 115-129.10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.115]Search in Google Scholar
[Simon, H.; and Wallach, D. 1999. Cognitive modeling in perspective. Kognitionswissenschaft. 8(1): 1-4.10.1007/BF03354931]Search in Google Scholar
[Stewart, T.C. 2007. A Methodology for Computational Cognitive Modelling. Ph.D. Dissertation, Institute of Cognitive Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stewart, T.C.; and West, R. 2007. Equivalence: A novel basis for model comparison. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stewart, T.C.; West, R.; and Lebiere, C. 2009. Applying cognitive architectures to decision-making: How cognitive theory and the equivalence measure triumphed in the Technion Prediction Tournament. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thagard, P. 1995. The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. In Theory, evidence and explanation ed. P. Lipton. Dartmouth: Aldershot.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tryon, W. 2001. Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests. Psychological Methods. 6(4): 371-386.10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.371]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilkinson, L.; and Task Force on Statistical Inference. 1999. Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist. 54: 594-604.10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594]Search in Google Scholar