Modelling Dynamic Decision Making with the ACT-R Cognitive Architecture

Anderson, J. R.; Bothell, D.; Byrne, M. D.; Douglass, S.; Lebiere, C.; and Qin, Y. 2004. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 111:1036-1060.10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, J. A. 2007. How can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195324259.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Anzai, Y. 1984. Cognitive control of real-time event driven systems. Cognitive Science 8:221-254.10.1207/s15516709cog0803_2Search in Google Scholar

Besnard, D.; Greathead, D.; and Baxter, G. 2004. When mental model's go wrong: co-occurrences in dynamic, critical systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 60:117-128.10.1016/j.ijhcs.2003.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Brehmer, B., and Allard, R. 1991. Real-time decision making: Effects of task complexity and feedback delays. In Rasmussen, J.; Brehmer, B.; and Leplat, J., eds., Distributed decision making: Cognitive models for cooperative work. Chichester: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Brehmer, B. 1992. Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems. Acta Psychologica 81:211-241.10.1016/0001-6918(92)90019-ASearch in Google Scholar

Dutt, V., and Gonzalez, C. 2007. Slope of inflow impacts dynamic decision making. In Eberlein, R. L.; Sterman, J. D.; and Oliva, R., eds., Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society.Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, W. 1962. Dynamic decision theory and probabilistic information processing. Human Factors 4:59-73.10.1177/001872086200400201Search in Google Scholar

Fitts, P. M. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47:381-391.10.1037/h0055392Search in Google Scholar

Fleetwood, M. D., and Byrne, M. D. 2006. Modeling the visual search of displays: A revised ACT-R/PM model of icon search based on eye tracking data. Human Computer Interaction 21:153-197.10.1207/s15327051hci2102_1Search in Google Scholar

Gluck, K. A., and Pew, R. W., eds. 2005. Modeling Human Behaviour with Integrated Cognitive Architectures: Comparison, Evaluation and Validation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, C., and Dutt, V. 2007. Learning to control a dynamic task: A system dynamics cognitive model of the slope effect. In Lewis, R. L.; Polk, T. A.; and Laird, J. E., eds., Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 61-66.Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, C.; Lerch, F. J.; and Lebiere, C. 2003. Instance-based learning in real-time dynamic decision making. Cognitive Science 27:591-635.10.1207/s15516709cog2704_2Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, C.; Thomas, R. P.; and Vanyukov, P. 2005. The relationships between cognitive ability and dynamic decision making. Intelligence 33:169-186.10.1016/j.intell.2004.10.002Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, C.; Vanyukanov, P.; and Martin, M. K. 2005. The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making. Computers in Human Behaviour 21:273-286.10.1016/j.chb.2004.02.014Search in Google Scholar

Gray, W. D. 2002. Simulated task environments: The role of high-fidelity simulations, scaled worlds, synthetic environments, and microworlds in basic and applied cognitive research. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2:205-227.Search in Google Scholar

Kleinmuntz, D., and Thomas, J. 1987. The value of action and inference in dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 39:341-364.10.1016/0749-5978(87)90028-8Search in Google Scholar

Laird, J. E.; Newell, A.; and Rosenbloom, P. S. 1997. SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 33:1-64.10.1016/0004-3702(87)90050-6Search in Google Scholar

Lovett, M. C., and Anderson, J. R. 1996. History of success and current context in problem solving: Combined influences on operator selection. Cognitive Psychology 31:168-217.10.1006/cogp.1996.0016Search in Google Scholar

Lovett, M. C., and Anderson, J. R. 2005. A strategy-based interpretation of Stroop. Cognitive Science 29:493-524.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_24Search in Google Scholar

Martin, M. K.; Gonzalez, C.; and Lebiere, C. 2004. Learning to make decisions in dynamic environments: ACT-R plays the beer game. In Lovett, M.; Schunn, C.; Lebiere, C.; and Munro, P., eds., Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 178-183.Search in Google Scholar

Meyer, D. E., and Kieras, D. E. 1997. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review 104:3-65.10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Newell, A. 1990. Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peebles, D., and Cheng, P. C.-H. 2003. Modeling the effect of task and graphical representation on response latency in a graph reading task. Human Factors 45:28-46.10.1518/hfes.45.1.28.27225Search in Google Scholar

Putz-Osterloh, W. 1993. Strategies for knowledge acquisition and transfer on knowledge in dynamic tasks. In Grube, G., and Wender, K. F., eds., The Cognitive Psychology of Knowledge. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 331-350.10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62664-3Search in Google Scholar

Rapoport, A. 1966. A study of human control in a dynamic multistage dcision task. Behavioral Science 11:18-32.10.1002/bs.38301101035901307Search in Google Scholar

Raven, J. 1962. Raven Standard Progressive Matrices Test. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Search in Google Scholar

Raven, J. 1977. Advanced Raven Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, S., and Pashler, H. 2000. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review 107:358-367.10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.35810789200Search in Google Scholar

Salvucci, D. D. 2006. Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Human Factors 48:362-380.10.1518/001872006777724417Search in Google Scholar

Shah, P., and Miyake, A. 1996. The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology 125:4-27.10.1037/0096-3445.125.1.4Search in Google Scholar

Sterman, J. D. 1989. Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43:301-335.10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1Search in Google Scholar

Sterman, J. D. 1994. Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review 10:291-330.10.1002/sdr.4260100214Search in Google Scholar

Taatgen, N. A.; Lebiere, C.; and Anderson, J. R. 2006. Modeling paradigms in ACT-R. In Sun, R., ed., Cognition and Multi-Agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 29-52.Search in Google Scholar

Vollmeyer, R.; Burns, B. D.; and Holyoak, K. J. 1996. The impact of goal specificity on strategy use and the acquisition of problem structure. Cognitive Science 20:75-100.10.1207/s15516709cog2001_3Search in Google Scholar