[[1] Critto A, Cantarella L, Carlon C, Giove S, Petrzzelli G, Marcomini A. Decision support-oriented selection of remediation technologies to rehabilitate contaminated sites. Integrated Environ Assess and Manage. 2006;2(3):273-285. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.5630020307.10.1002/ieam.5630020307]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Prokop G, Schamann M, Edelgaard I. Management of contaminated sites in Western Europe. Topic Report. No. 13/1999. Copenhagen: European Environ Agency; 2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] European Commission: Towards a Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, Brussels: the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions; 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Vanheusden B. Recent development in European policy regarding brownfield remediation. Environ Practice. 2009;11(4):256-262. DOI: 10.1017/S1466046609990202.10.1017/S1466046609990202]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control. Text with EEA relevance. Official J the European Union, L 24/8, 29.1.2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] 9VAC20-160-10. Definitions. Virginia Register Volume 13, Issue 18, eff. June 26, 1997; amended, Virginia Register Volume 18, Issue 18, eff. July 1, 2002; Accessed: 01.04.2011. Available: http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+reg+9VAC20-160-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Law of the Republic of Latvia. On Pollution (in Latvian: Par piesārņojumu) ("LV", 51 (2438), 29.03.2001; Ziņotājs, 9, 03.05.2001.) [in power from 01.07.2001.]; with Amendments.]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Regulation of the Cabinet of Ministers Nr.483. Identification and Registration of Contaminated and Potentially Contaminated Sites (in Latvian: Piesārņoto un potenciāli piesārņoto vietu apzināšanas un reģistrācijas kārtība) ("LV", 171 (2558), 27.11.2001.) [in power from 28.11.2001.]; with Amendments.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Ministry of Environment of Latvia. Informative Report. On Legislative Regulations for Remediation of Contaminated Sites with Historical Military Unexploded Ammunition and Explosive Objects (in Latvian). October, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Reddy KR, Adams JF, Richardson C. Potential technologies for remediation of brownfield. Practice Period Hazard, Toxic, and Radioact Waste Manage. 1999;3(2):61-68.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(1999)3:2(61)]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] National Register of Contaminated and Potentially Contaminated Sites (in Latvian: Piesārņoto un potenciāli piesārņoto vietu reģistrs). LVĢMC. Accessed: 07.04.2011. Available: http://oas.vdc.lv:7779/p_ppv.html]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Liepaja Navy Port Environmental Research (Liepājas ostas vides izpēte). (1996) ES PHARE programme and the Government of Latvia. Report: Baltec Associates, Inc. (in Latvian, not published).]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Lombi E, Wenzel WW, Adriano DC. Soil contamination, risk reduction and remediation. Land Contam Reclam. 1998; 6(4):183-197. DOI: 10.2462/09670513.401.]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Shi C, Fernandez-Jimenez A. Stabilization / solidification of hazardous and radioactive wastes with alkali-activated cements. J Hazard Mater B, 2006;137:1656-1663. DOI: 10.1016/j.hazmat.2006.05.008.]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Emerging Technologies for the Remediation of Metals in Soils. Electrokinetics. Technology Overview. Interstate Technology and Regulatory Cooperation Work Group. December, 1997, 19.]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Gonzaga MIS, Santos JAG, Ma LQ. Arsenic phytoextraction and hyperaccumulation by Fern species. Sci Agric. 2006;63(1):90-101. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-90162006000100015.10.1590/S0103-90162006000100015]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Bolenz S, Omran H, Gierschner K. Treatments of water hyacinth tissue to obtain useful products. Biol Wastes. 1990;22:263-274. DOI: 10.1016/0269-7483(90)90130-K.10.1016/0269-7483(90)90130-K]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs BF. Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater: an evaluation. Eng Geology. 2001;60:193-207. DOI: 10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00101-0.10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00101-0]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Sarma H. Metal hyperaccumulation in plants: A review focusing on phytoremediation technology. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;4(2):118-138. DOI: 10.3923/iest.2011.118.138.]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] Sas-Nowosielska A, Galimska-Stypa R, Kucharski R, Zielonka U, Małkowski E, Gray L. Remediation aspect of microbial changes of plant rhizosphere in mercury contaminated soil. Environ Monit Assess. 2008;137(1-3):101-9. Epub 2007 May 11. DOI: 10.1007/S10661-007-9732-0.10.1007/s10661-007-9732-017492484]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] Ekohelp Ltd.: Report on Contamination Monitoring and Remediation (heavy metals), 2009 (in Latvian, not published).]Search in Google Scholar
[[22] Europroject Ltd.: Report on Contamination Research and Technical Economic Planning (heavy metals), 2010 (in Latvian, not published).]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] Standard: NEN 6966: 2003. Analyses of 30 selected elements - Atomic Emission Spectrometry with inductively coupled plasma.]Search in Google Scholar
[[24] BS EN 12457-2:2002. Characterisation of waste. Leaching. Compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials and sludges.]Search in Google Scholar
