A strict maximum likelihood explanation of MaxEnt, and some implications for distribution modelling

Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. - In: Petrov, B.N. & Csaki, F. (eds), Second international symposium on information theory, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp. 267-281.Search in Google Scholar

*Anderson, R.P. & Gonzalez, I.J. 2011. Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: an implementation with Maxent. - Ecol. Modelling 222: 2796-2811.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.04.011Search in Google Scholar

*Anderson, R.P. & Raza, A. 2010. The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela. - J. Biogeogr. 37: 1378-1393.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02290.xSearch in Google Scholar

Anonymous 2010. R version 2.11 for Windows. - The R foundation for statistical computing (http://cran.r-project.org)Search in Google Scholar

*Aranda, S.C. & Lobo, J.M. 2011. How well does presence-only-based species distribution modelling predict assemblage diversity? A case study of the Tenerife flora. - Ecography 34: 31-38.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06134.xSearch in Google Scholar

Araújo, M.B. & Guisan, A. 2006. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. - J. Biogeogr. 33: 1677-1688.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01584.xSearch in Google Scholar

Araújo, M.B., Pearson, R.G., Thuiller, W. & Erhard, M. 2005. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. - Global Change Biol. 11: 1504-1513.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01000.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Auestad, I., Halvorsen, R., Bakkestuen, V. & Erikstad, L. 2011. Utbredelsesmodellering av fremmede invaderende karplanter langs veg. - Dir. Naturforv. Utredn. 2011: 2: 1-30.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, M.P. 1999. A silent clash of paradigms: some inconsistencies in community ecology. - Oikos 86: 170-178.10.2307/3546582Search in Google Scholar

Austin, M.P. 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. - Ecol. Modelling 157: 101-118.10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00205-3Search in Google Scholar

Austin, M. 2007. Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. - Ecol. Modelling 200: 1-19.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Bakkestuen, V., Aarrestad, P.A., Stabbetorp, O.E., Erikstad, L. & Eilertsen, O. 2010. Vegetation composition, gradients and environment relationships of birch forest in six reference areas in Norway. - Sommerfeltia 33: 1-226.Search in Google Scholar

Barbosa, A.M. 2009. Transferability of environmental favourability models in geographic space: the case of the Iberian desman (Galemys pyrenaicus) in Portugal and Spain. - Ecol. Modelling 220: 747-754.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Barry, S. & Elith, J. 2006. Error and uncertainty in habitat models. - J. appl. Ecol. 43: 413-423.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01136.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Bartel, R.A. & Sexton, J.O. 2009. Monitoring habitat dynamics for rare and endangered species using satellite images and niche-based models. - Ecography 32: 888-896.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05797.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Bedia, J., Busqué, J. & Gutiérrez, J.M. 2011. Predicting plant species distribution across an alpine rangeland in northern Spain: a comparison of probabilistic methods. - Appl. Veg. Sci. 14: 415-432.10.1111/j.1654-109X.2011.01128.xSearch in Google Scholar

Berger, A.L., Della Pietra, S.A. & Della Pietra, V.J. 1996. A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. - Comput. Linguist. 22: 39-71.Search in Google Scholar

Bini, L.M., Diniz-Filho, A.F., Rangel, T.F.L.V.B., Akre, T.S.B., Albaladejo, R.G., Albuquerque, F.S., Aparicio, A., Araújo, M.B., Baselga, A., Beck, J., Bellocq, M.I., Böhning-Gaese, K., Borges, P.A.V., Castro-Parga, I., Chey, V.K., Chown, S.L., de Marco, P.J., Dobkin, D.S., Ferrer-Castán, D., Field, R., Filloy, J., Fleishman, E., Gómez, J.F., Hortal, J., Iverson, J.B., Kerr, J.T., Kissling, W.D., Kitching, I.J., León-Cortés, J.L., Lobo, J.M., Montoya, D., Morales-Castilla, I., Moreno, J.C., Oberdorff, T., Olalla-Tárraga, M.Á., Pausas, J.G., Qian, H., Rahbek, C., Rodríguez, M.Á., Rueda, M., Ruggiero, A., Sackmann, P., Sanders, N.J., Terribile, L.C., Vetaas, O.R. & Hawkins, B.A. 2009. Coefficient shifts in geographical ecology: an empirical evaluation of spatial and non-spatial regression. - Ecography 32: 193-204.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05717.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Bradley, B.A., Wilcove, D.S. & Oppenheimer, M. 2010. Climate change increases risk of plant invasion in the Eastern United States. - Biol. Invasions 12: 1855-1872.10.1007/s10530-009-9597-ySearch in Google Scholar

*Braunisch, V. & Suchant, R. 2010. Predicting species distributions based on incomplete survey data: the trade-off between precision and scale. - Ecography 33: 826-840.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05891.xSearch in Google Scholar

Brown, K.A., Spector, S. & Wu, W. 2008. Multi-scale analysis of species introductions: combining landscape and demographic models to improve management decisions about non-native species. - J. appl. Ecol. 45: 1639-1648.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01550.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Buermann, W., Saatchi, S., Smith, T.B., Zutta, B.R., Chaves, J.A., Milá, B. & Graham, C.H. 2008. Predicting species distributions across the Amazonian and Andean regions using remote sensing data. - J. Biogeogr. 35: 1160-1176.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01858.xSearch in Google Scholar

Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inferences: a practical information-theoretic approach, ed. 2. - Springer, New York.Search in Google Scholar

*Carnaval, A.C. & Moritz, C. 2008. Historical climate modelling predicts patterns of current biodiversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. - J. Biogeogr. 35: 1187-1201.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01870.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Carroll, C., Johnson, D.S., Dunk, J.R. & Zielinski, W.J. 2010. Hierarchical Bayesian spatial models for multispecies conservation planning and monitoring. - Conserv. Biol. 24: 1538-1548.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01528.x20497204Search in Google Scholar

*Cordellier, M. & Pfenninger, M. 2009. Inferring the past to predict the future: climate modelling predictions and phylogeography for the freshwater gastropod Radix balthica (Pulmonata Basommatophora). - Molec. Ecol. 18: 534-544.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04042.x19161472Search in Google Scholar

*Costa, G.C., Nogueira, C., Machado, R.B. & Colli, G.R. 2010. Sampling bias and the use of ecological niche modeling in conservation planning: a field evaluation in a biodiversity hotspot. - Biodiv. Conserv. 19: 883-899.10.1007/s10531-009-9746-8Search in Google Scholar

Crawley, M.J. 2007. The R book. - Wiley, Chichester.10.1002/9780470515075Search in Google Scholar

*Cunningham, H.R., Rissler, L.J. & Apodaca, J.J. 2009. Competition at the boundary in the slimy salamander: using reciprocal transplants for studies on the role of biotic interactions in spatial distributions. - J. Anim. Ecol. 78: 52-62.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01468.xSearch in Google Scholar

Danz, N.P., Reich, P.B., Frelich, L.E. & Niemi, G.J. 2011. Vegetation controls vary across space and spatial scale in a historic grassland-forest biome boundary. - Ecography 34: 402-414.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06561.xSearch in Google Scholar

De'ath, G. 2007. Boosted trees for ecological modeling and prediction. - Ecology 88: 243-251.10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[243:BTFEMA]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Della Pietra, S., Della Pietra, V. & Lafferty, J. 1997. Inducing features of random fields. - IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 19: 1-13.10.1109/34.588021Search in Google Scholar

DeLong, E.R., DeLong, D.M. & Clarke-Pearson, D.L. 1988. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a non-parametric approach - Biometrics 44: 837-845.10.2307/2531595Search in Google Scholar

*DeMatteo, K.E. & Loiselle, B.A. 2008. New data on the status and distribution of the bush dog (Speothos venaticus): evaluating its quality of protection and directing research efforts. - Biol. Conserv. 141: 2494-2505.10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.010Search in Google Scholar

*Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Bini, L.M., Rangel, T.F., Loyola, R.D., Hof, C., Nogués-Bravo, D. & Araújo, M.B. 2009. Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change. - Ecography 32: 897-906.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06196.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dobrowski, S.Z., Safford, H., D., Cheng, Y.B. & Ustin, S.L. 2008. Mapping mountain vegetation using species distribution modeling, image-based texture analysis, and object-based classification. - Appl. Veg. Sci. 11: 499-508.Search in Google Scholar

Dormann, C. 2011. Modelling species’ distributions. - In: Jopp, F., Reuter, H. & Breckling, B. (eds), Modelling complex ecological dynamics: an introduction into ecological modelling, Springer, Berlin, pp. 179-196.Search in Google Scholar

Dormann, C.F., McPherson, J.M., Araújo, M.B., Bivand, R., Bolliger, J., Carl, G., Davies, R.G., Hirzel, A., Jetz, W., Kissling, W.D., Kühn, I., Ohlemüller, R., Peres-Neto, P.R., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Schurr, F.M. & Wilson, R. 2007. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. - Ecography 30: 609-628.10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dubuis, A., Pottier, J., Rion, V., Pellissier, L., Theurillat, J.-P. & Guisan, A. 2011. Predicting spatial patterns of plant species richness: a comparison of direct macroecological and species stacking modelling approaches. - Divers. Distrib. 17: 1122-1131.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00792.xSearch in Google Scholar

Dudík, M. & Phillips, S.J. 2009. Generative and discriminative learning with unknown labeling bias. - Adv. neural Inf. Process. Syst. 21: 401-408.Search in Google Scholar

Dudík, M., Phillips, S.J. & Schapire, R.E. 2007. Maximum entropy density estimation with generalized regularization and an application to species distribution modeling. - J. Machine Learning Res. 8: 1217-1260.Search in Google Scholar

*Echarri, F., Tambussi, C. & Hospitaleche, C.A. 2009. Predicting the distribution of the crested tinamous, Eudromia spp. (Aves, Tinamiformes). - J. Ornithol. 150: 75-84.10.1007/s10336-008-0319-5Search in Google Scholar

*Edrén, S.M.C., Wisz, M.S., Teilmann, J., Dietz, R. & Söderkvist, J. 2010. Modelling spatial patterns in harbour porpoise satellite telemetry data using maximum entropy. - Ecography 33: 698-708.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05901.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Edvardsen, A., Bakkestuen, V. & Halvorsen, R. 2011. A fine-grained spatial prediction model for the red-listed vascular plant Scorzonera humilis. - Nord. J. Bot. 29: 495-504.10.1111/j.1756-1051.2010.00984.xSearch in Google Scholar

Edwards, T.C.J., Cutler, D.R., Zimmermann, N.E., Geiser, L. & Alegria, J. 2005. Model-based stratifications for enhancing the detection of rare ecological events. - Ecology 86: 1081-1090.10.1890/04-0608Search in Google Scholar

Edwards, T.C.J., Cutler, D.R., Zimmermann, N.E., Geiser, L. & Moisen, G.G. 2006. Effects of sample survey design on the accuracy of classification tree models in species distribution models. - Ecol. Modelling 199: 132-141.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.016Search in Google Scholar

Elith, J. & Graham, C.H. 2009. Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. - Ecography 32: 66-77.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05505.xSearch in Google Scholar

Elith, J., Graham, C.H., Anderson, R.P., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., Hijmans, R.J., Huettmann F., Leathwick, J.R., Lehmann, A., Li, J., Lohmann, L.G., Loiselle, B.A., Manion, G., Moritz, C., Nakamura, M., Nakazawa, Y., Overton, J.M.M., Peterson, A.T., Phillips, S.J., Richardson, K., Scachetti-Pereira, R., Schapire, R.E., Soberón, J., Williams, S., Wisz, M.S. & Zimmermann, N.E. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. - Ecography 29: 129-151. *Elith, J., Kearney, M. & Phillips, S. 2010. The art of modelling range-shifting species. - Methods Ecol. Evol. 1: 330-342.Search in Google Scholar

Elith, J. & Leathwick, J.R. 2009. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. - A. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40: 677-697.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159Search in Google Scholar

Elith, J., Leathwich, J.R. & Hastie, T. 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. - J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 802-813.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01390.x18397250Search in Google Scholar

Elith, J., Phillips, S.J., Hastie, T., Dudík, M., Chee, Y.E. & Yates, C.J. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. - Divers. Distrib. 17: 43-57.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Feeley, K.J. & Silman, M.R. 2011. Keep collecting: accurate species distribution modelling requires more collections than previously thought. - Divers. Distrib. 17: 1132-1140.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00813.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Ficetola, G.F., Thuiller, W. & Miaud, C. 2007. Prediction and validation of the potential global distribution of a problematic invasive alien species. - Divers. Distrib. 13: 476-485.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00377.xSearch in Google Scholar

Fielding, A.H. & Bell, J.E. 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence-absence models. - Environm. Conserv. 24: 38-49. *Fitzpatrick, M.C., Gove, A.D., Sanders, N.J. & Dunn, R.R. 2008. Climate change, plant migration, and range collapse in a global biodiversity hotspot: the Banksia (Proteaceae) of Western Australia. - Global Change Biol. 14: 1337-1352.Search in Google Scholar

Franklin, J. 2009. Mapping species distributions: spatial inference and prediction. - Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511810602Search in Google Scholar

Franklin, J. 2010. Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography. - Divers. Distrib. 16: 321-330.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00641.xSearch in Google Scholar

Franklin, J., Wejnert, K.E., Hathaway, S.A., Rochester, C.J. & Fisher, R.N. 2009. Effect of species rarity on the accuracy of species distribution models for reptiles and amphibians in southern California. - Divers. Distrib. 15: 167-177.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00536.xSearch in Google Scholar

Friedman, J.H. 1991. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. - Ann. Statist. 19: 1-67.10.1214/aos/1176347963Search in Google Scholar

*Gaikwad, J., Wilson, P.D. & Ranganathan, S. 2011. Ecological niche modeling of customary medicinal plant species used by Australian aborigines to identify species-rich and culturally valuable areas for conservation. - Ecol. Modelling 222: 3437-3443.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.005Search in Google Scholar

*Gastón, A. & García-Viñas, J.I. 2011. Modelling species distributions with penalised logistic regressions: a comparison with maximum entropy models. - Ecol. Modelling 222: 2037-2041.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.04.015Search in Google Scholar

Gellrich, M. & Zimmermann, N.E. 2007. Investigating the regional-scale pattern of agricultural land abandonment in the Swiss mountains: a spatial statistical modelling approach. - Landsc. Urban Planning 79: 65-76.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.03.004Search in Google Scholar

*Gibson, L., Barrett, B. & Burbridge, A. 2007. Dealing with uncertain absences in habitat modelling: a case study of a rare ground-dwelling parrot. - Divers. Distrib. 13: 704-713.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00365.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gini, C. 1912. Variabilità e mutabilità - Bologna, Cuppini.Search in Google Scholar

*Giovanelli, J.G.R., Haddad, C.F.B. & Alexandrino, J. 2008. Predicting the potential distribution of the alien invasive American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) in Brazil. - Biol. Invasions 10: 585-590.10.1007/s10530-007-9154-5Search in Google Scholar

*Gormley, A.M., Forsyth, D.M., Griffioen, P., Lindeman, M., Ramsey, D.S.L., Scroggie, M.P. & Woodford, L. 2011. Using presence-only and presence-absence data to estimate the current and potential distributions of established invasive species. - J. appl. Ecol. 48: 25-34.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01911.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Graham, C.H. & Hijmans, R.J. 2006. A comparison of methods for mapping species ranges and species richness. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15: 578-587.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00257.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Graham, C.H., VanDerWal, J., Phillips, S.J., Moritz, C. & Williams, S.E. 2010. Dynamic refugia and species persistence: tracking spatial shifts in habitat through time. - Ecography 33: 1062-1069.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06430.xSearch in Google Scholar

Guisan, A., Broennimann, O., Engler, R., Vust, M., Yoccoz, N.G., Lehmann, A. & Zimmermann, N.E. 2006. Using niche-based models to improve the sampling of rare species. - Conserv. Biol. 20: 501-511.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00354.xSearch in Google Scholar

Guisan, A., Graham, C.H., Elith, J., Huettmann, F. & Group, N.S.D.M. 2007. Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size. - Divers. Distrib. 13: 332-340.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00342.xSearch in Google Scholar

Guisan, A. & Zimmermann, N.E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. - Ecol. Modelling 135: 147-186.10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9Search in Google Scholar

Halvorsen, R. 2012. A gradient analytic perspective on distribution modelling. - Sommerfeltia, submitted manuscript.10.2478/v10208-011-0015-3Search in Google Scholar

Hanley, J.A. & McNeil, B.J. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. - Radiology 143: 29-36.10.1148/radiology.143.1.70637477063747Search in Google Scholar

Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. 2009. The elements of statistical learning, ed. 2. - Springer, New York.10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7Search in Google Scholar

Hengl, T., Sierdsema, H., Radović, A. & Dilo, A. 2009. Spatial prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence-only records: combining point pattern analysis, ENFA and regressionkriging. - Ecol. Modelling 220: 3499-3511.Search in Google Scholar

*Hernandez, P.A., Graham, C.H., Master, L.L. & Albert, D.L. 2006. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. - Ecography 29: 773-785.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hijmans, R.J. & Elith, J. 2011. Species distribution modelling with R. - http://cran.r-project.org/ web/packages/dismo/vignettes/sdm.pdf, The R foundation for statistical computing.Search in Google Scholar

*Hijmans, R.J. & Graham, C.H. 2006. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. - Global Change Biol. 12: 2272-2281.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01256.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hirzel, A.H., Le Lay, G., Helfer, V., Randin, C. & Guisan, A. 2006. Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. - Ecol. Modelling 199: 142-152.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.017Search in Google Scholar

Hjort, J. & Marmion, M. 2009. Periglacial distribution modelling with a boosting method. - Permafr. periglac. Proc 20: 15-25.10.1002/ppp.629Search in Google Scholar

*Hoffman, J.D., Aguilar-Amuchastegui, N. & Tyre, A.J. 2010. Use of simulated data from a processbased habitat model to evaluate methods for predicting species occurrence. - Ecography 33: 656-666.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05495.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hortal, J., Jiménez-Valverde, A., Gómez, J.F., Lobo, J.M. & Baselga, A. 2008. Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the species. - Oikos 117: 847-858.10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16434.xSearch in Google Scholar

Huisman, J., Olff, H. & Fresco, L.F.M. 1993. A hierarchical set of models for species response analysis. - J. Veg. Sci. 4: 37-46.10.2307/3235732Search in Google Scholar

Jaynes, E.T. 1957. Information theory and statistical mechanics. - Phys. Rev. 106: 620-630.10.1103/PhysRev.106.620Search in Google Scholar

Jaynes, E.T. 1957. Information theory and statistical mechanics. II. - Phys. Rev. 108: 171-190.10.1103/PhysRev.108.171Search in Google Scholar

Jaynes, E.T. 2003. Probability theory: the logic of science. - Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511790423Search in Google Scholar

Jiménez-Valverde, A., Lobo, J. & Hortal, J. 2008. Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. - Divers. Distrib. 14: 885-890.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00496.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kadmon, R., Farber, O. & Danin, A. 2004. Effect of roadside bias on the accuracy of predictive maps produced by bioclimatic models. - Ecol. Appl. 14: 401-413.10.1890/02-5364Search in Google Scholar

*Kharouba, H.M., Algar, A.C. & Kerr, J.T. 2009. Historically calibrated predictions of butterfly species’ range shift using global change as a pseudo-experiment. - Ecology 90: 2213-2222.10.1890/08-1304.119739383Search in Google Scholar

*Ko, C.Y., Root, T.L. & Lee, P.F. 2011. Movement distances enhance validity of predictive models. - Ecol. Modelling 222: 947-954.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Kodric-Brown, A. & Brown, J.H. 1993. Incomplete data sets in community ecology and biogeography: a cautionary tale. - Ecol. Appl. 3: 736-742.10.2307/194210427759285Search in Google Scholar

Kullback, S. 1959. Information theory and statistics. - New York, Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

*Lahoz-Monfort, J.J., Guillera-Arroita, G., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Young, R.P. & Nicholson, E. 2010. Satellite imagery as a single source of predictor variables for habitat suitability modelling: how Landsat can inform the conservation of a critically endangered lemur. - J. appl. Ecol. 47: 1094-1102.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01854.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Lamb, J.M., Ralph, T.M.C., Goodman, S.M., Bogdanowicz, W.,, Fahr, J., Gajewska, M., Bates, P.J.J., Eger, J., Benda, P. & & Taylor, P.J. 2008. Phylogeography and predicted distribution of African-Arabian and Malagasy populations of giant mastiff bats, Otomops spp. (Chiroptera: Molossidae). - Acta chiropterol. 10: 21-40.Search in Google Scholar

Leathwick, J.R., Elith, J. & Hastie, T. 2006. Comparative performance of generalized additive models and multivariate adaptive regression splines for statistical modelling of species distributions. - Ecol. Modelling 199: 188-196.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.022Search in Google Scholar

Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical ecology, ed. 2. - Elsevier, Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

Lobo, J.M. 2008. More complex distribution models or more representative data? - Biodiv. Inform. 5: 14-19.10.17161/bi.v5i0.40Search in Google Scholar

Lobo, J.M., Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Hortal, J. 2010. The uncertain nature of absences and their importance in species distribution modelling. - Ecography 33: 103-114.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06039.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lobo, J.M., Jiménez-Valverde, A. & Real, R. 2008. AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 17: 145-151.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Loiselle, B.A., Jørgensen, P.M., Consiglio, T., Jiménez, I., Blake, J.G., Lohmann, L.G. & Montiel, O.M. 2008. Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes? - J. Biogeogr. 35: 105-116.Search in Google Scholar

*Lozier, J.D., Aniello, P. & Hickerson, M.J. 2009. Predicting the distribution of Sasquatch in western North America: anything goes with ecological niche modelling. - J. Biogeogr. 36: 1623-1627.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02152.xSearch in Google Scholar

Luoto, M., Pöyry, J., Heikkinen, R.K. & Saarinen, K. 2005. Uncertainty of bioclimatic envelope models based on the geographical distribution of species. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 14: 575-584.10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00186.xSearch in Google Scholar

McCarthy, K.P., Fletcher, R.J.J., Rota, C.T. & Hutto, R.L. 2011. Predicting species distributions from samples collected along roadsides. - Conserv. Biol. 26: 68-77.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01754.xSearch in Google Scholar

Maggini, R., Lehmann, A., Zimmermann, N.E. & Guisan, A. 2006. Improving generalized regression analysis for the spatial prediction of forest communities. - J. Biogeogr. 33: 1729-1749.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01465.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Marini, M.Á., Barbet-Massin, M., Lopes, L. & Jiguet, F. 2010. Predicting the occurrence of rare Brazilian birds with species distribution models. - J. Ornithol. 151: 857-866.10.1007/s10336-010-0523-ySearch in Google Scholar

*Marino, J., Bennett, M., Cossios, D., Iriarte, A., Lucherini, M., Pliscoff, P., Sillero-Zubiri, C., Villalba, L. & Walker, S. 2011. Bioclimatic constraints to Andean cat distribution: a modelling application for rare species. - Divers. Distrib. 17: 311-322.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00744.xSearch in Google Scholar

Marmion, M., Luoto, M., Heikkinen, R.K. & Thuiller, W. 2009a. The performance of state-of-the-art modelling techniques depends on geographical distribution of species. - Ecol. Modelling 220: 3512-3520. *Mateo, R.G., Croat, T.B., Felicísimo, Á.M. & Muñoz, J. 2010. Profile or group discriminative techniques? Generating reliable species distribution models using pseudo-absences and target-group absences from natural history collections. - Divers. Distrib. 16: 84-94.Search in Google Scholar

*Merckx, B., Steyaert, M., Vanreusel, A., Vincx, M. & Vanaverbeke, J. 2011. Null models reveal preferential sampling, spatial autocorrelation and overfitting in habitat suitability modelling. - Ecol. Modelling 222: 588-597.Search in Google Scholar

Metz, C.E. 1978. Basic principles of ROC curve analysis. - Semin. nucl. Med. 8: 283-298.10.1016/S0001-2998(78)80014-2Search in Google Scholar

Michel, P., Overton, J.M., Mason, N.W.H., Hurst, J.M. & Lee, W.G. 2011. Species-environment relationships of mosses in New Zealand indigenous forest and shrubland ecosystems. - Pl. Ecol. 212: 353-367.10.1007/s11258-010-9827-5Search in Google Scholar

Minchin, P.R. 1989. Montane vegetation of the Mt. Field massif, Tasmania: a test of some hypotheses about properties of community patterns. - Vegetatio 83: 97-110.Search in Google Scholar

*Monterroso, P., Brito, J.C., Ferreras, P. & Alves, P.C. 2009. Spatial ecology of the European wildcat in a Mediterranean ecosystem: dealing with small radio-tracking datasets in species conservation. - J. Zool. 279: 27-35.10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00585.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mouton, A.M., de Baets, B. & Goethals, P.L.M. 2010. Ecological relevance of performance criteria for species distribution models. - Ecol. Modelling 221: 1995-2002.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.04.017Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, A.H. & Winkler, R.L. 1987. A general framework for forecast verification. - Mon. Weather Rev. 115: 1330-1338.10.1175/1520-0493(1987)115<1330:AGFFFV>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

*Murray-Smith, C., Brummitt, N.A., Oliveira-Filho, A.T., Bachman, S., Moat, J., Lughadha, E.M.N. & Lucas, E.J. 2009. Plant diversity hotspots in the Atlantic coastal forests of Brazil. - Conserv. Biol. 23: 151-163.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01075.xSearch in Google Scholar

Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C. & Vining, G.G. 2002. Generalized linear models with applications in engineering and the sciences. - Wiley, New York.Search in Google Scholar

*Niamir, A., Skidmore, A.K., Toxopeus, A.G., Muñoz, A.R. & Real, R. 2011. Finessing atlas data for species distribution models. - Divers. Distrib. 17: 1173-1185.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00793.xSearch in Google Scholar

Nóbrega, C.C. & de Marco, P.J. 2011. Unprotecting the rare species: a niche-based gap analysis for odonates in a core Cerrado area. - Divers. Distrib. 17: 491-505.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00749.xSearch in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H. 1990a. Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to Fennoscandia. - Sommerfeltia Suppl. 1: 1-233.Search in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H. 1992. Studies in SE Fennoscandian mires: relevance to ecological theory. - J. Veg. Sci. 3: 279-284.10.2307/3235693Search in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H. 2007. Wise use of statistical tools in ecological field studies. - Folia geobot. 42: 123-140.10.1007/BF02893879Search in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H., Rydgren, K. & Økland, T. 2003. Plant species composition of boreal spruce swamp forests: closed doors and windows of opportunity. - Ecology 84: 1909-1919.10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1909:PSCOBS]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

Økland, R.H., Økland, T. & Rydgren, K. 2001. Vegetation-environment relationships of boreal spruce swamp forests in Østmarka Nature Reserve, SE Norway. - Sommerfeltia 29: 1-190.10.2478/som-2001-0001Search in Google Scholar

Oksanen, J. & Minchin, P.R. 2002. Continuum theory revisited: what shape are species responses along ecological gradients? - Ecol. Modelling 157: 119-129.10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00190-4Search in Google Scholar

*Parisien, M.A. & Moritz, M.A. 2009. Environmental controls on the distribution of wildfire at multiple spatial scales. - Ecol. Monogr. 79: 127-154.10.1890/07-1289.1Search in Google Scholar

*Parolo, G., Rossi, G. & Ferrarini, A. 2008. Toward improved species niche modelling: Arnica montana in the Alps as a case study. - J. appl. Ecol. 45: 1410-1418.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01516.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pearce, J.L. & Boyce, M.S. 2006. Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. - J. appl. Ecol. 43: 405-412.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01112.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pearce, J. & Ferrier, S. 2000a. An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression. - Ecol. Modelling 128: 127-147.10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00227-6Search in Google Scholar

Pearce, J.L. & Ferrier, S. 2000b. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. - Ecol. Modelling 133: 225-245.10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00322-7Search in Google Scholar

*Pearson, R.G., Raxworthy, C.J., Nakamura, M. & Peterson, A.T. 2007. Predicting species distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar. - J. Biogeogr. 34: 102-117.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.xSearch in Google Scholar

Peterson, A.T., Papes, M. & Eaton, M. 2007. Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent. - Ecography 30: 550-560.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.05102.xSearch in Google Scholar

Peterson, A.T., Soberón, J., Pearson, R.G., Anderson, R.P., Martínez-Meyer, E., Nakamura, M. & Araújo, M.B. 2011. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. - Monogr. Pop. Biol. 49: 1-314.10.23943/princeton/9780691136868.003.0003Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, S.J. 2011. A brief tutorial on Maxent. - AT&T Research, Princeton, NJ.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P. & Schapire, R.E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. - Ecol. Modelling 190: 231-259.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, S.J. & Dudík, M. 2008. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. - Ecography 31: 161-175.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.xSearch in Google Scholar

Phillips, S.J., Dudík, M., Elith, J., Graham, C.H., Lehmann, A., Leathwich, J.R. & Ferrier, S. 2009. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: implications for background and pseudo-absence data. - Ecol. Appl. 19: 181-197.10.1890/07-2153.119323182Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, S.J., Dudík, M. & Schapire, R. 2004. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. - In: Anonymous (ed.), Proceedings of the 21st international conference on machine learning, ACM Press, New York, pp. 655-662.Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, S. & Elith, J. 2010. POC-plots: calibrating species distribution models using presenceonly data. - Ecology 91: 2476-2484.10.1890/09-0760.120836469Search in Google Scholar

*Pineda, E. & Lobo, J.M. 2009. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns. - J. anim. Ecol. 78: 182-190.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01471.x18771504Search in Google Scholar

Platts, P.J., Ahrends, A., Gereau, R.E., McClean, C.J., Lovett, J.C., Marshall, A.R., Pellikka, P.K.E., Mulligan, M., Fanning, E. & Marchant, R. 2010. Can distribution models help refine inventory- based estimates of conservation priority? A case study in the Eastern Arc forests of Tanzania and Kenya. - Divers. Distrib. 16: 628-642.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00668.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Raes, N. & ter Steege, H. 2007. A null-model for significance testing of presence-only species distribution models. - Ecography 30: 727-736.10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05041.xSearch in Google Scholar

Randin, C.F., Dirnböck, T., Dullinger, S., Zimmermann, N.E., Zappa, M. & Guisan, A. 2006. Are nichebased species distribution models transferable in space? - J. Biogeogr. 33: 1689-1703.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01466.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Rebelo, H. & Jones, G. 2010. Ground validation of presence-only modelling with rare species: a case study on barbastelles Barbastella barbastellus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). - J. appl. Ecol. 47: 410-420.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01765.xSearch in Google Scholar

Reineking, B. & Schröder, B. 2006. Constrain to perform: regularization of habitat models. - Ecol. Modelling 193: 675-690.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.003Search in Google Scholar

*Reside, A.E., Watson, I., VanDerWal, J. & Kutt, A.S. 2011. Incorporating low-resolution historic species location data decreases performance of distribution models. - Ecol. Modelling 222: 3444-3448.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.06.015Search in Google Scholar

*Riordan, E.C. & Rundel, P.W. 2009. Modelling the distribution of a threatened habitat: the California sage scrub. - J. Biogeogr. 36: 2176-2188.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02151.xSearch in Google Scholar

Robertson, M.P., Cumming, G.S. & Erasmus, B.F.N. 2010. Getting the most out of atlas data. - Divers. Distrib. 16: 363-375.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00639.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Rota, C.T., Fletcher, R., Jr., Evans, J.M. & Hutto, R.L. 2011. Does accounting for imperfect detection improve species distribution models? - Ecography 34: 659-670.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06433.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Roura-Pascual, N., Brotons, L., Peterson, A.T. & Thuiller, W. 2009. Consensual predictions of potential distributional areas for invasive species: a case study of Argentine ants in the Iberian Peninsula. - Biol. Invasions 11: 1017-1031.10.1007/s10530-008-9313-3Search in Google Scholar

Roxburgh, S.H. & Mokany, K. 2010. On testing predictions of species relative abundance from maximum entropy optimisation. - Oikos 119: 583-590.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17772.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Rupprecht, F., Oldeland, J. & Finckh, M. 2011. Modelling potential distribution of the threatened tree species Juniperus oxycedrus: how to evaluate the predictions of different modelling approaches? - J. Veg. Sci. 22: 647-659.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2011.01269.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rydgren, K., Halvorsen, R., Auestad, I. & Hamre, L.N. in press. Ecological design is more important than compensatory mitigation for successful restoration of alpine spoil heaps. - Rest. Ecol. in press.Search in Google Scholar

Rydgren, K., Økland, R.H. & Økland, T. 2003. Species response curves along environmental gradients: a case study from SE Norwegian swamp forests. - J. Veg. Sci. 14: 869-880.10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02220.xSearch in Google Scholar

Santika, T. 2011. Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 20: 181-192.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00581.xSearch in Google Scholar

Santika, T. & Hutchinson, M.F. 2009. The effect of species response form on species distribution model prediction and inference. - Ecol. Modelling 220: 2365-2379.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.004Search in Google Scholar

Schwarz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. - Ann. Statist. 6: 461-464.10.1214/aos/1176344136Search in Google Scholar

Segurado, P., Araújo, M.B. & Kunin, W.E. 2006. Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for nichebased models. - J. appl. Ecol. 43: 433-444.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01162.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Sérgio, C., Figueira, R., Draper, D., Menezes, R. & Sousa, A.J. 2007. Modelling bryophyte distribution based on ecological information for extent of occurrence assessment. - Biol. Conserv. 135: 341-351.10.1016/j.biocon.2006.10.018Search in Google Scholar

Shipley, B. 2010. Community assembly, natural selection and maximum entropy models. - Oikos 119: 604-609.Search in Google Scholar

Shipley, B., Vile, D. & Garnier, É. 2006. From plant traits to plant communities: a statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity. - Science 314: 812-814.10.1126/science.1131344Search in Google Scholar

Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry, ed. 3. - Freeman, New York.Search in Google Scholar

*Stachura-Skierczyńska, K., Tumiel, T. & Skierczyński, M. 2009. Habitat prediction model for three-toed woodpecker and its implications for the conservation of biologically valuable forests. - For. Ecol. Mgmt 258: 697-703.10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.007Search in Google Scholar

Steyerberg, E.W., Eijkemans, M.J., Harrell Jr., F.E. & Habbema, J.D. 2000. Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets. - Statist. Med. 19: 1059-1079.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000430)19:8<1059::AID-SIM412>3.0.CO;2-0Search in Google Scholar

*Suárez-Seoane, S., García de la Morena, E.L., Prieto, M.B.M., Osborne, P.E. & de Juana, E. 2008. Maximum entropy niche-based modelling of seasonal changes in little bustard (Tetraxtetrax) distribution. - Ecol. Modelling 219: 17-29.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.07.035Search in Google Scholar

Suárez-Seoane, S., Osborne, P.E. & Rosema, A. 2004. Can climate data from METEOSAT improve wildlife distribution models? - Ecography 27: 629-636.10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03939.xSearch in Google Scholar

Swets, J.A. 1988. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. - Science 240: 1285-1293.10.1126/science.3287615Search in Google Scholar

*Svenning, J.-C., Normand, S. & Kageyama, M. 2008. Glacial refugia of temperate trees in Europe: insights from species distribution modelling. - J. Ecol. 96: 1117-1127.10.1111/j.1365-2745.2008.01422.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Synes, N.W. & Osborne, P.E. 2011. Choice of predictor variables as a source of uncertainty in continental-scale species distribution modelling under climate change. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 20: 904-914.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00635.xSearch in Google Scholar

ter Braak, C.J.F. & Prentice, I.C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. - Adv. ecol. Res. 18: 271-317.10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60183-XSearch in Google Scholar

*Thompson, G.D., Robertson, M.-P., Webber, B.L., Richardson, D.M., Le Roux, J.J. & Wilson, J.R.U. 2011. Predicting the subspecific identity of invasive species using distribution models: Acacia saligna as an example. - Divers. Distrib. 17: 1001-1014.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00820.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Thorn, J.S., Nijman, V., Smith, D. & Nekaris, K.A.I. 2009. Ecological niche modelling as a technique for assessing threats and setting conservation priorities for Asian slow lorises (Primates: Nycticebus). - Divers. Distrib. 15: 289-298.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00535.xSearch in Google Scholar

Tibshirani, R. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. - J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 58: 267-288.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.xSearch in Google Scholar

Tingley, R. & Herman, T.B. 2009. Land-cover data improve bioclimatic models for anurans and turtles at a regional scale. - J. Biogeogr. 36: 1656-1672.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02117.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Tinoco, B.A., Astudillo, P.X., Latta, S.C. & Graham, C.H. 2009. Distribution, ecology and conservation of an endangered Andean hummingbird: the violet-throated metaltail (Metallurabaroni). - Bird Conserv. Int. 19: 63-76. *Tittensor, D.P., Baco, A.R., Brewin, P.E., Clark, M.R., Consalvey, M., Hall-Spencer, J., Rowden, A.A., Schlacher, T., Stocks, K.I. & Rogers, A.D. 2009. Predicting global habitat suitability for stony corals on seamounts. - J. Biogeogr. 36: 1111-1128. *Tognelli, M.F., Roig-Juñent, S.A., Marvaldi, A.E., Flores, G.E. & Lobo, J.M. 2009. An evaluation of methods for modelling distribution of Patagonian insects. - Revta chil. Hist. nat. 82: 347-360.Search in Google Scholar

Trivedi, M.R., Berry, P.M., Morecroft, M.D. & Dawson, T.P. 2008. Spatial scale affects bioclimate model projections of climate change impacts on mountain plants. - Global Change Biol. 14: 1089-1103.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01553.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Urbina-Cardona, J.N. & Flores-Villela, O. 2010. Ecological-niche modeling and prioritization of conservation-area networks for Mexican herpetofauna. - Conserv. Biol. 24: 1031-1041.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01432.x20345399Search in Google Scholar

*Václávík, T. & Meentemeyer, R.K. 2009. Invasive species distribution modeling (iSDM): are absence data and dispersal constraints needed to predict actual distributions? - Ecol. Modelling 220: 3248-3258.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.08.013Search in Google Scholar

*VanDerWal, J., Shoo, L.P., Graham, C.H. & Williams, S.E. 2009a. Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: how far should you stray from what you know? - Ecol. Modelling 220: 589-594.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.010Search in Google Scholar

*VanDerWal, J., Shoo, L.P. & Williams, S.P. 2009b. New approaches to understanding late Quaternary climate fluctuations and refugial dynamics in Australian wet tropical rain forests. - J. Biogeogr. 36: 291-301. van Neil, K.P. & Austin, M.P. 2007. Predictive vegetation modeling for conservation: impact of error propagation from digital elevation data. - Ecol. Appl. 17: 266-280.Search in Google Scholar

Varela, S., Rodríguez, J. & Lobo, J.M. 2009. Is current climatic equilibrium a guarantee for the transferability of distribution model predictions? A case study of the spotted hyena. - J. Biogeogr. 36: 1645-1655.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02125.xSearch in Google Scholar

Vaughan, I.P. & Ormerod, S.J. 2003. Improving the quality of distribution models for conservation by addressing shortcomings in the field collection of training data. - Conserv. Biol. 17: 1601-1611.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00359.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Veloz, S.D. 2009. Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models. - J. Biogeogr. 36: 2290-2299.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02174.xSearch in Google Scholar

Venables, W.N. & Ripley, B.D. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. - Springer, New York.10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2Search in Google Scholar

*Verbruggen, H., Tyberghein, L., Pauly, K., Vlaeminck, C., van Nieuwenhuyze, K., Kooistra, W., Leliaert, F. & de Clerck, O. 2009. Macroecology meets macroevolution: evolutionary niche dynamics in the seaweed Halimeda. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 18: 393-405.10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00463.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Wang, Y., Xie, B., Wan, F., Xiao, Q. & Dai, L. 2007. The potential geographic distribution of Radopholus similis in China. - Agric. Sci. China 6: 1444-1449.10.1016/S1671-2927(08)60006-1Search in Google Scholar

*Ward, D.F. 2007. Modelling the potential geographic distribution of invasive ant species in New Zealand. - Biol. Invasions 9: 723-735.10.1007/s10530-006-9072-ySearch in Google Scholar

Ward, G., Hastie, T., Barry, S., Elith, J. & Leathwick, J.R. 2009. Presence-only data and the EM algorithm. - Biometrics 65: 554-563.10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01116.x482188618759851Search in Google Scholar

*Warren, D.L., Glor, R.E. & Turelli, M. 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. - Evolution 62: 2868-2883.10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00482.x18752605Search in Google Scholar

Warren, D.L., Glor, R.E. & Turelli, M. 2010. ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. - Ecography 33: 607-611.10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06142.xSearch in Google Scholar

Warren, D.L. & Seifert, S.N. 2011. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: the importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. - Ecol. Appl. 21: 335-342.10.1890/10-1171.121563566Search in Google Scholar

*Webber, B.L., Yates, C.J., La Maitre, D.C., Scott, J.K., Kriticos, D.J., Ota, N., McNeill, A., Le Roux, J.J. & Midgley, G.F. 2011. Modelling horses for novel climate courses: insights from projecting potential distributions of native and alien Australian acacias with correlative and mechanistic models. - Divers. Distrib. 17: 978-1000.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00811.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Weber, T.C. 2011. Maximum entropy modeling of mature hardwood forest distribution in four U.S. states. - For. Ecol. Mgmt 261: 779-788.10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.009Search in Google Scholar

Whittaker, R.J., Araújo, M.B., Jepson, P., Ladle, R.J., J.E.M., W. & Willis, K.J. 2005. Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. - Divers. Distrib. 11: 3-23.10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00143.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Willems, E.P. & Hill, R.A. 2009. A critical assessment of two species distribution models: a case study of the vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). - J. Biogeogr. 36: 2300-2312.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02166.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Williams, J.N., Seo, C.W., Thorne, J., Nelson, J.K., Erwin, S., O’Brien, J.M. & Schwartz, M.W. 2009. Using species distribution models to predict new occurrences for rare plants. - Divers.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00567.xSearch in Google Scholar

Distrib. 15: 565-576.Search in Google Scholar

*Wisz, M.S., Hijmans, R.J., Li, J., Peterson, A.T., Graham, C.H., Guisan, A. & NCEAS Predicting Species Distributions Working Group 2008. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. - Divers. Distrib. 14: 763-773.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00482.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wohlgemuth, T., Nobis, M.P., Kienast, F. & Plattner, M. 2008. Modelling vascular plant diversity at the landscape scale using systematic samples. - J. Biogeogr. 35: 1226-1240.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01884.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wollan, A.K., Bakkestuen, V. & Halvorsen, R. 2011. Romlig prediksjonsmodellering av åpen grunnlendt kalkmark i Oslofjord-området. - Univ. Oslo NatHist. Mus. Rapp. 11: 176-196.Search in Google Scholar

*Wollan, A.K., Bakkestuen, V., Kauserud, H., Gulden, G. & Halvorsen, R. 2008. Modelling and predicting fungal distribution patterns using herbarium data. - J. Biogeogr. 35: 2298-2310.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.01965.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Wolmarans, R., Robertson, M.P. & van Rensburg, B.J. 2010. Predicting invasive alien plant distributions: how geographical bias in occurrence records influences model performance. - J. Biogeogr. 37: 1797-1810.10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02325.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wood, S.N. 2006. Generalized additive models. - Chapman & Hall, London.10.1201/9781420010404Search in Google Scholar

*Yates, C., McNeill, A., Elith, J. & Midgley, G. 2010. Assessing the impacts of climate change and land transformation on Banksia in the South West Australian floristic region. - Divers. Distrib. 16: 187-201.10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00623.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Yesson, C. & Culham, A. 2006. A phyloclimatic study of Cyclamen. - BMC evol. Biol. 6: 72: 1-23.10.1186/1471-2148-6-72159975516987413Search in Google Scholar

*Yost, A.C., Petersen, S.L., Gregg, M. & Miller, R. 2008. Predictive modeling and mapping sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) nesting habitat using maximum entropy and a longterm dataset from southern Oregon. - Ecol. Informatics 3: 375-386.10.1016/j.ecoinf.2008.08.004Search in Google Scholar

*Young, B.F., Franke, I., Hernandez, P.A., Herzog, S.K., Paniagua, L., Tovar, C. & Valqui, T. 2009. Using spatial models to predict areas of endemism and gaps in the protection of Andean slope birds. - Auk 126: 554-565.10.1525/auk.2009.08155Search in Google Scholar

Zielinski, W.J., Dunk, J.R., Yaeger, J.S. & LaPlante, D.W. 2010. Developing and testing a landscapescale habitat suitability model for fisher (Martes pennanti) in forests of interior northern California. - For. Ecol. Mgmt 260: 1579-1591.10.1016/j.foreco.2010.08.006Search in Google Scholar

Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N. & Smith, G.M. 2007. Analysing ecological data. - Springer, New York.10.1007/978-0-387-45972-1Search in Google Scholar