[Barna M. 2004. Adaptation of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to different ecological conditions: leaf size variation. Polish J. Ecol. 52: 34-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beaudet M. & Messier C. 1998. Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient. Can. J. For. Res. 28: 1007-1015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Białobrzeska M. & Staszkiewicz J. 1997. The variability of leaves of Corylus avellana (Betulacae). Fragm. Flor. Geobot. Polonica, Suppl. 2: 15-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Black-Samuelsson S. & Andersson S. 2003. The effect of nutrient stress on developmental instability in leaves of Acer platanoides (Aceracae) and Betula pendula (Betulacae). Amer. J. Bot. 90: 1107-1112.10.3732/ajb.90.8.1107]Search in Google Scholar
[Cowart N. M. & Graham J. H. 1999. Within- and amongindividual variation in fluctuating asymmetry of leaves in the fig (Ficus carica L.). Inter. J. Plant Sci. 160: 116-121.10.1086/314104]Search in Google Scholar
[Danielewicz W. 1993. Morfologiczna zmienność liści, owoców i łusek owocowych brzozy karpackiej (Betula carpatica Waldst. et Kit.) w Polsce. Rocz. Dendr. 41: 33-52.]Search in Google Scholar
[Danielewicz W. & Maciejewska I. 1994. Zmienność wybranych cech morfologicznych brzóz z przeobrażonych siedlisk torfowisk wysokich okolic Chlebowa w Puszczy Noteckiej. Rocz. Dendr. 42: 23-36.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frazer G. W. Trofymow J. A. & Lertzman K. P. 2000. Canopy openness and leaf area in chronosequences of coastal temperate rainforest. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 239-256.10.1139/x99-201]Search in Google Scholar
[Freenam D. C., Brown M. L., Duda J. J., Graraham J. H., Emlen J. M., Krzysik A. J., Balbach H., Kovacic D. A. & Zak J. C. 2005. Leaf fluctuating asymmetry, soil disturbance and plant stress: a multiple year comparison using two herbs, Ipomoea pandurata and Cnidoscolus stimulosus. Ecol. Indicat. 5: 85-95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hódar J. A. 2002. Leaf fluctuating asymmetry of Holm oak in response to drought under contrasting climatic conditions. J. Arid Environ. 52: 233-243.10.1006/jare.2002.0989]Search in Google Scholar
[Jack S. B. & Long J. N. 1991. Response of leaf area index to density for two contrasting tree species. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 1760-1764.10.1139/x91-243]Search in Google Scholar
[Jennions M. D. 1996. The allometry of fluctuating asymmetry in southern African plants: flowers and leaves. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 127-142.10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01458.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Lempa K., Martel J., Koricheva J., Haukioja E., Ossipov V., Ossipova S. & Pihlaja K. 2000. Covariation of fluctuating asymmetry, herbivory and chemistry during birch leaf expansion. Oecologia 122: 354-360.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lichtenthaler H. K., Buschmann C., Döl M., Fietz H. J., Bach T., Kozel U., Meier D. & Rahmsdorf U. 1981. Photosynthetic activity, chloroplast ultrastructure, and leaf characteristics of high-light and low-light plants and of sun and shade leaves. Photosyn. Res. 2: 115-141.]Search in Google Scholar
[McDonald P. G., Fonseca C. R., McC. Overton J. & Westoby M. 2003. Leaf-size divergence along rainfall and soil-nutrient gradients: is the method of size reduction common among clades? Funct. Ecol. 17: 50-57.10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00698.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Møller A. P. 1999. Elm, Ulmus glabra, leaf asymmetry and Dutch elm disease. Oikos 85: 109-116.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nagamitsu T., Kawahara T. & Hotta M. 2004. Phenotypic variation and leaf fluctuating asymmetry in isolated populations of an endangered dwarf birch Betula ovalifolia in Hokkaido, Japan. Pl. Sp. Biol. 19: 13-21.10.1111/j.1442-1984.2004.00097.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Niinemets Ü. & Kull K. 2003. Leaf structure vs. nutrient relationships vary with soil conditions in temperate shrubs and trees. Acta Oecol. 24: 209-219.10.1016/S1146-609X(03)00094-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Osada N., Takeda H., Furukawa A. & Awang M. 2001. Leaf dynamics and maintenance of tree crowns in a Malaysian rain forest stand. J. Ecol. 89: 774-782.10.1046/j.0022-0477.2001.00590.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Osada N., Takeda H., Kawaguchi H., Furukawa A. & Awang M. 2003. Estimation of crown characters and leaf biomass from leaf litter in Malaysian canopy species, Elateriospermum tapos (Euphorbiaceae). For. Ecol. Manag. 177: 379-386.]Search in Google Scholar
[Premoli A. C. 1996. Leaf architecture of South American Nothofagus (Nothofagacae) using traditional and new methods in morphometrics. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 121: 25-40.10.1111/j.1095-8339.1996.tb00743.x]Search in Google Scholar
[StatSoft, Inc. 2001. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 6. www.statsoft.com]Search in Google Scholar
[Svoboda A. M. 1972. Variability in leaves of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). 143 pp. Studie ČSAVZ, Praha.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zar J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edition. Prentice-Hall. London.]Search in Google Scholar