[Abdullah, M., Parasuraman, B., Muniapan, B., Koren, S., & Jones, M. L. (2008). Motivating factors associated with adult participation in distance learning program. InternationalEducation Studies, 1(4), 104-109.10.5539/ies.v1n4p104]Search in Google Scholar
[Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States,2005. Retrieved August 5, 2012, from http://www.sloan-c.org/resources/growing_by_degrees.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Aristotle. (2004). The Nicomachean ethics. (J. A. K. Thomson, trans.). London: Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Austin, A. E. (2002). Creating a bridge to the future: Preparing the new faculty to face changing expectations in a shifting context. The Review of Higher Education, 26(2), 119-144.10.1353/rhe.2002.0031]Search in Google Scholar
[Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. EducationalAssessment, Evaluation & Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Bush, M. D., & Mott, J. D. (2009). The transformation of learning with technology: Learnercentricity, content and tool malleability, and network effects. Educational Technology, 49(3), 3-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, K., Schwier, R. A., & Kenny, R. F. (2005). Agency of the instructional designer: Moral coherence and transformative social practice. Australasian Journal of EducationalTechnology, 21(2), 242-262. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet21/campbell.html10.14742/ajet.1337]Search in Google Scholar
[Cey, T. (2001). Moving towards constructivist classroom. Retrieved December 19, 2009, from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/ceyt/ceyt.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[Cranton, P. (1994). Understanding and promoting transformative learning: A guide for educatorsof adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Daley, D. M. (1991). Great expectations or a tale of two systems: Employee attitudes toward graphic rating scales & MBO-based performance appraisal. Public AdministrationQuarterly, 15(2), 188-209.]Search in Google Scholar
[Darder, A., Baltodano, M., & Torres, R. D. (2003). The critical pedagogy reader. London: Routledge Falmer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Haan, G. (2006). ‘The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: A ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’ - based model for education for sustainable development’. Environmental EducationResearch, 12(1), 19-32.10.1080/13504620500526362]Search in Google Scholar
[Duffy, T. M., & Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivist and the technology of instruction: Aconversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elliott, J. (2010). Insights to transformative learning through education for sustainable development. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 5, 96-113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Engstrom, M., Santo, S., & Yost, R. (2008). Knowledge building in an online cohort. TheQuarterly Review of Distance Education, 9(2), 151-167.]Search in Google Scholar
[European University Association. (2006). Guidelines for quality enhancement in Europeanjoint master programmes. Retrieved February 20, 2012, from http://www.eua.be/eua/jsp/en/upload/EMNEM_report.1147364824803.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Fien, J., & Tilbury, D. (1996). Learning for a sustainable environment: An agenda for teachereducation in Asia and the Pacific. Bangkok: UNESCO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frey, B., & Alman, S. (2003). Applying adult learning theory to the online classroom. NewHorizons in Adult Education, 17(1), 4-12. Retrieved July 10, 2011, from http://education.fiu.edu/newhorizons/journals/volume17n1.pdf10.1002/nha3.10155]Search in Google Scholar
[Galloway, D. (2005). Evaluating distance learning and e-learning: Is Kirkpatrick’s model relevant?. Performance Improvement, 44(4), 21-27. DOI: 10.1002/pfi.4140440407.10.1002/pfi.4140440407]Search in Google Scholar
[Garvin, D. A. (2000). Learning in action: A guide to putting the learning organization to work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gikandi, J. (2011). Achieving meaningful online learning through effective formative assessment. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing demands,changing directions (pp. 452-454). Retrieved March 15, 2012, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/hobart11/procs.Gikandi-poster.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Giroux, H. (n.d.). Teachers as transformatory intellectuals. Symposium on understandingquality education. Conference on re-envisioning quality education. Retrieved March, 15, 2012, from http://www.afed.itacec.org/document/henry_giroux_2_ok.pdfGiroux, H. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals. Boston, MA: Bergin & Garvey.]Search in Google Scholar
[Glasser, H. (2007). Minding the gap: The role of social learning in linking our stated desire for a more sustainable world to our everyday actions and policies. In A. E. J. Wals, (Ed.), Social learning towards a sustainable world. Principles, perspectives, and praxis (pp. 35-62). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. New York: The Falmer Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models,Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 115-140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hasselbring, T. S., & Moore, P. R. (1996). Developing mathematical literacy through the use of contextualized learning environments. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education,7(3/4), 199-222.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huckle, J. (1996). Realising sustainability in changing times. In J. Huckle & S. Sterling (Eds.), Education for sustainability (pp. 3-17). London, UK: Earthscan Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huckle, J. (2008). An analysis of new labour’s policy on education for sustainable development (ESD) with particular reference to socially critical approaches. Environmental EducationResearch, 14(1), 65-75.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huckle, J. (2012). Teacher education for sustainability in network society: Combining digital and sustainability literacies. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 14(2), 130-146.10.2478/v10099-012-0013-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Hudak, C. (2007). Linking instructional theories and instructional design to leaning objects: A proposed conceptual framework. In A. Koohang & K. Hamman (Eds.), Learning objectsand instructional designs (pp. 1-38). Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivist vs. constructivist: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology: Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34-37.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environment. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models (Vol. 2, pp. 215-239). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jonassen, D. H., & Reeves, T. C. (1996). Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications andtechnology (pp. 693-719). New York: Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivistperspective. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[IAU (International Association of Universities). (2006). Selected bibliography on educationand sustainable development. Retrieved October 14, 2011, from http://www.UNESCO.org/iau/sd/sd_bibliography.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking andlearning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kanuka, H., & Anderson, T. (1999). Using constructivism in technology-mediated learning: Constructing order out of the chaos in the literature. Radical Pedagogy, 2(1). Retrieved July 5, 2008, from http://www.icaap.org/RadicalPedagogy/content/vol1.1999/issue2/02kanuka1_2.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Kenny, R. F., Zhang, Z., Schwier, R. A., & Campbell, K. (2005). A review of what instructional designers do: Questions answered and questions not asked. Canadian Journal of Learningand Technology, 31(1), 9-26.10.21432/T2JW2P]Search in Google Scholar
[Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.10.5465/amle.2005.17268566]Search in Google Scholar
[Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355]Search in Google Scholar
[Lim, G. (2007). Instructional design and pedagogical consideration for the ins-and-outs of learning objects. In A. Koohang & K. Hamman (Eds.), Learning objects and instructionaldesigns (pp. 89-137). Santa Rosa, California: Informing Science Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V. (2006). Preparing United Arab Emirates teachers for building a sustainable society. Heraklion: University of Crete.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V. (2008). An instructional design module of ICT that empowers teachers to integrate education for sustainable development across the curriculum. In C. Angeli & N. Valanides (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Panhellenic Conference with InternationalParticipation on Information and Communication Technologies in Education (pp. 391-398). Cyprus: University of Cyprus.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V. (2010a). The challenge of WikiQuESD as an environment for constructing knowledge in teaching and learning for sustainable development. Discourse andCommunication for Sustainable Education, 1(1), 50-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V. (2010b). Strategies to reinforce the role of ICT in teaching and learning for sustainability. In M. Witthaus, K. Candless & R. Lambert (Eds.), Tomorrow today (pp. 169-171). Leicester: Tudor Rose on behalf of UNESCO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V. (2010c). ICT-enabled reorienting teacher education to address sustainable development: A case study. In T. Jimogiannis (Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th PanhellenicConference ICT in Education (pp. 1- 8). Korinthos: University of Peloponnese.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V. (2011a). Strategies for change towards sustainability in tertiary education supported by ICT. In ICT in teacher education: Policy, open educational resources andpartnership (pp. 152-166). Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V. (2011b). ICT-enabled education for sustainable development: Merging theory with praxis. In M. Youssef & S. Aziz Anwar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conferenceon e-Learning Excellence in the Middle East 2011 - in Search of New Paradigms for re-Engineering Education (pp. 410-419). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V. (2012). Critical issues for the course curricular design and development of postgraduate programmes. Proceedings of International Forum “Modern Information Society Formation: Problems, Perspectives, Innovation Approaches” (pp. 85-107). Saint-Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Aerospace Instrumentation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2005). Techno-sciences and mathematics: Vehicles for a sustainable future and global understanding. Proceedings of the 2nd InternationalConference on Hands on Science. HSci 2005 (pp. 103-108). Heraklion: University of Crete.]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012a). The challenges of ICTs to online climate change education for sustainable development: The ExConTra learning paradigm. In S.A. Anwar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on eLearning Excellence in the MiddleEast - Sustainable Innovation in Education (pp. 594-605). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.10.12816/0032071]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V., & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012b). Online course design for a joint M.Sc. programme on ICT in education for sustainable development. In S. A. Anwar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on eLearning Excellence in the Middle East - SustainableInnovation in Education (pp. 627-636). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.10.12816/0032071]Search in Google Scholar
[Makrakis, V., Kostoulas-Makrakis, N., & Kanbar, N. (2012). Developing and validating an ESD student competence framework: A Tempus-RUCAS initiative. In S. A. Anwar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on eLearning Excellence in the Middle East - SustainableInnovation in Education (pp. 585-594). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marsick, V., & Mezirow, J. (2002). New work on transformative learning. Teachers collegerecord. Retrieved September 20, 2008, from http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=10876]Search in Google Scholar
[Mayer, R. H. (1999). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: New paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 141-159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[McLaren, P. (1994). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations ofeducation. New York: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as a discourse. Journal of TransformativeEducation, 1(1), 58-63.10.1177/1541344603252172]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyers, S. (2008). Using transformative pedagogy when teaching online. College Teaching,56(4), 219-224. DOI: 10.3200/CTCH.56.4.219-224.10.3200/CTCH.56.4.219-224]Search in Google Scholar
[Nam, C. S., & Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2007). Web-based learning environment: A theory-based design process for developopment and evaluation. Journal of Information TechnologyEducation, 6, 23-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Novak, J. (1998). Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as tools to understandand facilitate the process in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.10.4324/9781410601629]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Neill, G. (2010). Initiating curriculum revision: Exploring the practices of educational developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(1), 61-71. DOI: 10.1080/13601440903529927.10.1080/13601440903529927]Search in Google Scholar
[Oppermann, R., & Specht, M. (2006). Situated learning in the process of work. In D. Hung & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies (pp. 69-89). Berlin: Springer Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[O’Sullivan, E. (2003). Bringing a perspective of transformative learning to globalized consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 27(4), 326-330. DOI: 10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00327.x.10.1046/j.1470-6431.2003.00327.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Paas, L. (2008). How information and communications technologies can support education forsustainable development. Current uses and trends. Manitoba Canada: IISD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pliner, S. M., & Johnson, J. R. (2004). Historical, theoretical, and foundational principles of universal instructional design in higher education. Equity & Excellence in Education,37(2), 105-113. DOI: 10.1080/10665680490453913.10.1080/10665680490453913]Search in Google Scholar
[Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc./Merrill Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rychen, S., & Salganick, L. (2003). A holistic model of competence. In S. Rychen & L. Salagnick (Eds.), Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society (pp. 41-62). Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber.]Search in Google Scholar
[Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1996). Problem-based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments:Case studies in instructional design (pp. 135-148). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, A. (2005). Bridging the gap between knowledge management and e-learning with context-aware corporate learning solutions In K. Althoff, A. Dengel, R. Bergmann, M. Nick & T. R. Berghofer (Eds.), Professional knowledge management. Third biennial conference (pp. 203-213). WM 2005, Kaiserlautern, Germany: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, A. (2008). Enabling learning on demand in semantic work environments: The learning in process approach In J. Rech, B. Decker & E. Ras (Eds.), Emerging technologiesfor semantic work environments: Techniques, methods and applications (pp. 1-21). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schmidt, A., & Braun, S. (2006). Context-aware workplace learning support: Concept, experiences, and remaining challenges. In W. Nejdl & K. Tochtermann (Eds.), Innovativeapproaches for learning and knowledge sharing. First European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2006) (pp. 518-524). Crete, Greece: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, S. S., McGuire, J. M., & Shaw, S. F. (2003). Universal design for instruction: A new paradigm for adult instruction in postsecondary education. Remedial and SpecialEducation, 24(6), 369-379.10.1177/07419325030240060801]Search in Google Scholar
[Seitz, K., & Schreiber, J. R. (2005). Towards sustainable development - learning for a worldqualified for the future. A discussion paper of the Association of German development nongovernmental organisations (VENRO) on the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2005-2014. VENRO-working paper No. 15.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shurville, S., Browne, T., & Whitaker, M. (2008). Employing educational technologists: A call for evidenced change. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings of ASCILITE Melbourne 2008. Retrieved May 6, 2010, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/shurville.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, M. K. (2000). Curriculum theory and practice. The encyclopaedia of informal education. Retrieved June 4, 2010, from www.infed.org/biblio/b-curric.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[Sorensen, E. K., & Takle, E. S. (2005). Investigating knowledge building dialogues in networked communities of practice. A collaborative learning endeavor across cultures. InteractiveEducational Multimedia, 10, 50-60.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. Duffy & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivismand the technology of instruction (pp. 57-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Squires, D. (1999). Educational software for constructivist learning environments: Subversive use and volatile design. Educational Technology, 39(3), 48-54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Summers, M., & Kruger, C. (2003). Teaching sustainable development in primary schools: Theory into practice. The Curriculum Journal, 14(2), 157-180. DOI: 10.1080/0958517032000095763.]Search in Google Scholar
[Svanstrom, M., Lozano-Garcia, F. J., & Rowe, D. (2008). Learning outcomes for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in HigherEducation, 19(3), 339-351. DOI: 10.1108/14676370810885925.10.1108/14676370810885925]Search in Google Scholar
[Tilbury, D., Podger, D., & Reid, A. (2004). Action research for change towards sustainability:Change in curricula and graduate skills towards sustainability. Final report prepared for the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage and Macquarie University, September 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (1996). Learning: The treasure within, report to UNESCO of the international commission oneducation for the twentieth century. Paris: UNESCO.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2003). TheDecade of Education for Sustainable Development: Framework for a draft internationalimplementation scheme. Paris: UNESCO.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2005). Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability,UNESCO education for sustainable development in action. Technical Paper No. 4. Paris: UNESCO.]Search in Google Scholar
[UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2010). Education for sustainable development lens: A policy and practice review tool. Education forsustainable development in action learning & training tools. No. 2. Paris: UNESCO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vare, P., & Scott, B. (2007). Learning for a change: Exploring the relationship between educationand sustainable development. Bath: Learning South West.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vrasidas, C. (2001). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. International Journal of EducationalTelecommunications, 6(4), 339-362.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wade, R. (2012). Pedagogy, places and people. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability,14(2), 147-167.10.2478/v10099-012-0014-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Wals, A. E. J. (2007). Introduction. In A. E. J. Wals (Ed.), Social learning towards a sustainableworld: Principles, perspectives, and praxis (pp. 17-32). Wageningen: Wageningen Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wals, A. E. J., & Heymann, F. V. (2004). Learning on the edge: Exploring the change potential of conflict in social learning for sustainable living. In A. Wenden (Ed.), Educating for aculture of social and ecological peace (pp. 123-145). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wals, A. E. J., & Blaze Corcoran, P. (2006). Sustainability as an outcome of transformative learning. In J. Holmberg & B. E. Samuelson (Eds.), Drivers and barriers for implementingsustainable development in higher education (pp. 103-108). Paris: UNESCO.]Search in Google Scholar
[Willis, J. (2000). The maturing of constructivist instructional design: Some basic principles that can guide practice. Educational Technology, 40(1), 5-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). (1987). Our common future(Brundtland report). London: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wenger, E., & Lave, J. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
