Analyzing the Process of Patent Submission with a Special Emphasis on the Phases of the Research Process - the Case of Slovenia

Balconi M., Breschi S. & Lissoni F. (2004). Networks of inventors and role of academia. Research Policy, 33:127-145. Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2.10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Baldini N. Grimaldi R., Sobrero M. & (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35: 518-532, Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.00410.1016/j.respol.2006.01.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bozeman B. (2000). Technology and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29: 627-655, Elsevier Science. DOI: S0048-7333_99.00093-110.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Bühler D. (2009). Concepts and strategies for protecting IP, European Patent Attorney, Maiwald Patentanwalts GmbH. Presentation and internal documents, Ljubljana, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Chang Y. C., Chen M. H. & Yang P. Y. (2006). Managing academic innovation in Taiwan: Towards a ‘scientific-economic’ framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73:119-213, Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.004.10.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

COBISS http://splet02.izum.si/cobiss/Bibliographies.jsp?init=tSearch in Google Scholar

COBISS, 2006 (internal extract from researcher database).Search in Google Scholar

Cole J. & Cole S. (1973). Social stratification in Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Czarnitzki D., Glanzel W. & Hussinger K. (2009). Heterogeneity of patent activity and its implications for scientific research. Research Policy, 38:26-34, Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.001.10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dai Y., Popp D. & Bretschneider S. (2005). Institutions and Intellectual Property: The Influence of Institutional Forces on University Patenting. Journal of Policy and Management, 24 (3): 579-598. DOI: 10.1002/pam.20116.10.1002/pam.20116Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Davis L. (2004). Intellectual property rights, strategy and policy. Economics of innovation & New technology, 13 (5):399-415. DOI: 10.1080/1043859042000188683.10.1080/1043859042000188683Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Dietz J. S. & Bozeman B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34:349 - 367. Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008.10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Employment Related Industrial Property Rights Act, Official Gazette of the RS, No. 45/95.Search in Google Scholar

Erickson G. S. (2003). The Patenting Process, Innovation, and Size. Knowledge, Technolog, & Policy, 15 (4):24-36.Search in Google Scholar

Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C. & Terra B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29: 313-330, Elsevier Science. DOI: S0048- 7333_99.00069-4.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Etzkowitz H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32: 109-121, Elsevier Science. DOI: S0048-7333(02)00009-4.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Geuna A. & Nesta L. J. J. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence. Research Policy. 35: 790-807. Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.00510.1016/j.respol.2006.04.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Giuri, P., Mariani, M., S. Brusoni, G. Crespi, D., Francoz, A., Gambardella, W., Garcia-Fontes, A., Geunac, R., Gonzales, D. Harhoff, K., Hoisl, C., Le Bas, A., Luzzi, L., Magazzini, L., Nesta, O., Nomaler, N., Palomeras, P., Patel, M., Romanelli, B. & Verspagen, B. (2007). Inventors and invention processes in Europe: Results from the PatVal-EU survey. Research Policy. 36: 1107-1127. Elsevier Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.008.10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hockaday, T. (2009). Technology Transfer from the University of Oxford, Presentation of the University of Oxford's Technology Transfer Office. ISIS Innovation Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

Jaffe, A. B., Traajtenberg, M. & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3): 577-598.10.2307/2118401Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lach, S. & Schankerman, M. (2003). Incentives and invention in Universities, Working paper 9727, available from: http://.nber.org/papers/w9727Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology (MVZT), Internal documents, 2005 (Presentation of science research activities, PPT presentation)Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, R. P., Kruytbosch, C. & Kannankutty, N. (2001). Patenting and innovation activity of U. S. Scientists and Engineers in the academic sector: comparisons with industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2): 173-183.Search in Google Scholar

Owen-Smith, J. & Powell, W. (2001). To patent or not, faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2): 99-114.Search in Google Scholar

Parvan, S. V. (2007). Statistics in focus: Community Innovation Statistics. Eurostat, European Communities, Luxembourg: 8 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Rules on Remuneration for Innovations Created in the Employment Relationship (Pravilnik o nagradah za inovacije, ustvarjene v delovnem razmerju), Official Gazette of the RS, Nos. 31/98 (18/04/1998) and 14/99 (12/03/1999).Search in Google Scholar

Rules on the Adoption of Innovations and Inventions of the University of Ljubljana (Pravilnik o prevzemu inovacij in izumov Univerze v Ljubljani) http://www.unilj.si/RaziskovalnoDelo/RaziskovalnoDelo.aspSearch in Google Scholar

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, Fourth ed., The Free Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Slovenian Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) - patent definition and access to databases http://www.uil-sipo.si/Search in Google Scholar

Stephan, P. E. & Levin, S. G. (1992). Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The importance of Age, Place and Time. Oxford University Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Ženko, Z. & Marn, J. (2000): O patentni zaščiti računalniških programov. Naše gospodarstvo, 46(5/6): 773-783.Search in Google Scholar

Ženko, Z. & Marn, J. (1999): Patentna zaščita računalniških programov. Pospeševanje razvoja Slovenije. Ed. Mulej M., Maribor 02-03 December 1999. Maribor. Zbornik 20. PODIM.Search in Google Scholar