[Alonso D., Arizaga J. 2006. Biometrics of Citril Finch Serinus citrinella in the west Pyrenees and the influence of feather abrasion on biometric data.Ring. & Migr. 23: 116-124.10.1080/03078698.2006.9674354]Search in Google Scholar
[Andersson M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arizaga J., Campos F., Alonso D. 2006. Variations in wing morphology among subspecies might reflect different migration distances in Bluethroat.Ornis Fenn. 83: 162-169.]Search in Google Scholar
[Badyaev A. V., Landeen E. A. 2007. Developmental evolution of sexual ornamentation: model and a test of feather growth and pigmentation.Integr. Comp. Biol. 47: 221-233.10.1093/icb/icm05821672833]Search in Google Scholar
[Bairlein F. 1995. Manual of field methods. European-African Song Migration Network, Wilhelmshaven.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bortolotti G. R., Blas J., Negro J. J., Tella J. L. 2006. A complex plumage pattern as an honest social signal.Anim. Behav. 72: 423-430.10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Busse P. 1967. Application of the numerical indexes of the wing-shape.Not. Orn. 8: 1-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[Busse P. 1984. Key to sexing and ageing of European Passerines. Beitr. Naturk. Niedersachsens 37, Suppl.]Search in Google Scholar
[Busse P. 2000. Bird station manual. SE European Bird Migration Network, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk.]Search in Google Scholar
[Calmaestra R. G., Moreno E. 2001. A phylogenetically-based analysis on the relationship between wing morphology and migratory behaviour in passeriformes.Ardea 89: 407-416.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chandler C. R., Mulvihill R. S. 1988. The use of wing shape indices: an evaluation.Ornis Scand. 19: 212-216.10.2307/3676561]Search in Google Scholar
[Chatterjee S. 1997. The Rise of Birds: 225 Million Years of Evolution. The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore and London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Evered D. S. 1990. Measures of wing area and wing span from wing formula data.Auk 107: 784-787.10.2307/4088014]Search in Google Scholar
[Fernandez-Juricic E., Blumstein D. T., Abrica G., Manriquez L., Adams L. B., Adams R., Daneshard M., Rodriguez-Prieto I. 2006. Effects of body mass, size, and morphology on antipredator escape and post-escape responses: a comparative study with birds.Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 731-752.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fiedler W. 2005. Ecomorphology of the External Flight Apparatus of Blackcaps (Sylvia atricapilla) with Different Migration Behavior.Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1046: 253-263.10.1196/annals.1343.02216055858]Search in Google Scholar
[Ginn H. B., Melville D. S. 1983. Moult in Birds. BTO Guide 19, Tring, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grégoire A., McFarlane M. L., Faivre B., Evans M. R., Cherry M. I. 2007. Patterns of morphological variation in two sexually dimorphic bird species with different tail shapes.Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 91: 437-443.10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00808.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hołyński R. 1965. The methods of analysis of wing-formula variability.Not. Orn. 6: 21-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenni L., Winkler R. 1989. The feather-length of small passerines: a measurement for wing-length in live birds and museum skins.Bird Study 36: 1-15.10.1080/00063658909476996]Search in Google Scholar
[Jenni L., Winkler R. 1994. Moult and Ageing of European Passerines. Acad. Press, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kipp F. 1959. Der Handflügel-Index als flugbiologisches Mass.Vogelwarte 20: 77-86.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lockwood R., Swaddle J. P., Rayner J. M. V. 1998. Avian wingtip shape reconsidered: wingtip shape indices and morphological adaptations to migration.J. Avian Biol. 29: 273-292.10.2307/3677110]Search in Google Scholar
[Marchetti K., Price T., Richman A. 1995. Correlates of Wing Morphology with Foraging Behaviour and Migration Distance in the Genus Phylloscopus.J. Avian Biol. 26: 177-181.10.2307/3677316]Search in Google Scholar
[McCloskey J. T., Thompson J. E. 2000. Aging and sexing common snipe using discriminant analysis.J. Wildl. Manage. 64: 960-969.10.2307/3803205]Search in Google Scholar
[Møller A. P., Hedenström A. 1999. Comparative evidence for costs of secondary sexual characters: adaptive vane emargination of ornamented feathers in birds.J. Evol. Biol 12: 296-305.10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00034.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mönkkönen M. 1995. Do migrant birds have more pointed wings?: a comparative study.Evol. Ecol. 9: 520-528.10.1007/BF01237833]Search in Google Scholar
[Moreno E., Barbosa A., Carrascal L. M. 1997. Should congruence between intra- and interspecific ecomorphological relationship be expected? A case study with the great tit, Parus major.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 533-539.10.1098/rspb.1997.0076]Search in Google Scholar
[Norberg U. M. 1979. Morphology of the wing, legs and tail of three coniferous tits, the goldcrest and the treecreeper in relation to locomotor pattern and feeding station selection.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 287: 131-165.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peiro I. G., Robledano F., Esteve M. A. 2006. The effect of age and sex on wing morphology and body size of the Bearded Tit Panurus biarmicus in relation to complete moult.Ring. & Migr. 23: 101-106.10.1080/03078698.2006.9674352]Search in Google Scholar
[Pennycuick C. J. 1989. Bird flight performance: a practical calculation manual. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perez-Tris J., Ramirez A., Telleria J. L. 2003. Are Iberian Chaffchaffs Phylloscopus (collybita) brehmii long-distance migrants? An analysis of flight related morphology.Bird Study 50: 146-152.10.1080/00063650309461306]Search in Google Scholar
[Senar J. C., Lleonart J., Metcalfe N. B. 1994. Wing-shape variation between resident and transient wintering Siskins Carduelis spinus.J. Avian Biol. 25: 50-54.10.2307/3677293]Search in Google Scholar
[Svensson L. 1992. Identification guide to European Passerines. Stockholm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swaddle J. P, Lockwood R. 1998. Morphological adaptations to predation risk in passerines.J. Avian Biol. 29: 172-176.10.2307/3677195]Search in Google Scholar
[Tennekes H. 1996. The Simple Science of Flight: From Insects to Jumbo Jets. MIT Press, Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tucker V. A. 1995. Drag reduction by wing tip slots in a gliding Harris' hawk, Parabuteo unicinctus.J. Exp. Biol. 198: 775-781.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yong W., Moore F. R. 1994. Flight morphology, energetic condition, and the stopover biology of migrating thrushes.Auk 111: 683-692.]Search in Google Scholar
[Videler J. J. 2006. Avian Flight. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299928.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar