[Cremer T, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet 2001; 2(4): 292-301.10.1038/3506607511283701]Search in Google Scholar
[Lemke J, Claussen J, Michel S, Chudoba I, Mühlig P, Westermann M, Sperling K, Rubtsov N, Grummt UW, Ullmann P, Kromeyer-Hauschild K, Liehr T, Claussen U. The DNA-based structure of human chromosome 5 in interphase. Am J Hum Genet 2002; 71(5): 1051-1059.10.1086/34428638508412370837]Search in Google Scholar
[Weise A, Starke H, Heller A, Uwe C, Liehr T. Evidence for interphase DNA decondensation transverse to the chromosome axis: a multicolor banding analysis. Int J Mol Med 2002; 9(4): 359-361.10.3892/ijmm.9.4.359]Search in Google Scholar
[Iourov IY, Liehr T, Vorsanova SG, Kolotii AD, Yurov YB. Visualization of interphase chromosomes in postmitotic cells of the human brain by multicolour banding (MCB). Chromosome Res 2006; 14(3): 223-229.10.1007/s10577-006-1037-616628493]Search in Google Scholar
[Tanabe H, Kupper K, Ishida T, Neusser M, Mizusawa H. Inter- and intra-specific gene-density-correlated radial chromosome territory arrangements are conserved in Old World monkeys. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005; 108(1-3): 255-261.10.1159/00008082415545738]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider R, Grosschedl R. Dynamics and interplay of nuclear architecture, genome organization, and gene expression. Genes Dev 2007; 21(23):3027-3043.10.1101/gad.160460718056419]Search in Google Scholar
[Croft JA, Bridger JM, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore WA. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 1999; 145(6):1119-1131.10.1083/jcb.145.6.1119213315310366586]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolzer A, Kreth G, Solovei I, Koehler D, Saracoglu K, Fauth C, Muller S, Eils R, Cremer C, Speicher MR, Cremer T. Three-dimensional maps of all chromosomes in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes. PLoS Biol 2005; 3(3): e157.10.1371/journal.pbio.0030157108433515839726]Search in Google Scholar
[Branco MR, Pombo A. Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol 2006; 4(5): e138.10.1371/journal.pbio.0040138144094116623600]Search in Google Scholar
[Walter J, Joffe B, Bolzer A, Albiez H, Benedetti PA, Muller S, Speicher MR, Cremer T, Cremer M, Solovei I. Towards many colors in FISH on 3D-preserved interphase nuclei. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 114(3-4): 367-378.10.1159/00009422716954680]Search in Google Scholar
[Manvelyan M, Hunstig F, Mrasek K, Bhatt S, Pellestor F, Weise A, L iehr T. Position of chromosomes 18, 19, 21 and 22 in 3D-preserved interphase nuclei of human and gorilla and white hand gibbon. Mol Cytogenet 2008; 1(1): 9.10.1186/1755-8166-1-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Manvelyan M, Hunstig F, Bhatt S, Mrasek K, Pellestor F, Weise A, Simonyan I, Aroutiounian R, Liehr T. Chromosome distribution in human sperm - a 3D multicolor banding-study. Mol Cytogent 2008; 1(1): 25.10.1186/1755-8166-1-25]Search in Google Scholar
[Mateuca R, Lombaert N, Aka PV, Decordier I, Kirsch-Volders M. Chromosomal changes: induction, detection methods and applicability in human biomonitoring. Biochimie 2006; 88(11): 1515-1531.10.1016/j.biochi.2006.07.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Fenech M. Cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay evolves into a "cytome" assay of chromosomal instability, mitotic dysfunction and cell death. Mutat Res 2006; 600(1-2): 58-66.10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.05.028]Search in Google Scholar
[Schuler M, Rupa DS, Easmond DA. A critical evaluation of centromeric labelling to distinguish micronuclei induced by chromosomal loss and breakage in vitro. Mutat Res 1997; 392(1-2): 81-95.10.1016/S0165-1218(97)00047-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Fenech M. The in vitro micronucleus technique. Mutat Res 2000; 455(1-2): 81-95.10.1016/S0027-5107(00)00065-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosefort C, Fauth E, Zankl H. Micronuclei induced by aneugens and clastogens in mononucleate and binucleate cells using the cytokinesis block assay. Mutagenesis 2004; 19(4): 277-284.10.1093/mutage/geh02815215326]Search in Google Scholar
[Liehr T, Thoma K, Kammler K, Gehring C, Ekici A, Bathke KD, Grehl H, Rautenstrauss B. Direct preparation of uncultured EDTA-treated or heparinized blood for interphase FISH analysis. Appl Cytogenet 1995; 21(6): 185-188.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liehr T, Claussen U. Current developments in human molecular cytogenetic techniques. Curr Mol Med 2002; 2(3): 283-297.10.2174/156652402460572512041731]Search in Google Scholar
[Kirsch-Volders M, Sofuni T, Aardema M, Albertini S, Eastmond D, Fenech M, Ishidate M, Kirchner S, Lorge E, Morita T, Norppa H, Surrallés J, Vanhauwaert A, Wakata A. Report from the in vitro micronucleus assay working group. Mutat Res 2003; 540(2): 153-163.10.1016/j.mrgentox.2003.07.00514550499]Search in Google Scholar
[Kusakabe H, Takahashi T, Tanaka N. Chromosome-type aberrations in chromosome 9 after treatment of human peripheral blood lymphocytes with mitomycin C at the G(0) phase. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1999; 85(2): 212-216.10.1159/00001529510449900]Search in Google Scholar
[Leonard A, Rueff J, Gerber GB, Leonard ED. Usefulness and limits of biological dosimetry based on cytogenetic methods. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005; 115(1-4): 448-454.10.1093/rpd/nci06116381765]Search in Google Scholar