[Arazuri S., Jaren C., Arana J.I., Perez de Ciriza J.J. 2007. Influence of mechanical harvest on the physical properties of processing tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) J. Food Eng. 80: 190-198.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.05.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Artes F., Conesa M.A., Hernandez S., Gil M.I. 1999. Keeping quality of fresh-cut tomato. Post. Biol. Technol. 17: 153-162.10.1016/S0925-5214(99)00044-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Batu A. 2004. Determination of acceptable firmness and colour values of tomatoes. J. Food. Eng. 61: 471-475.10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00141-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernstein L., Francois L.E. 1975. Effects of frequency of sprinking with saline waterscompared with daily drip irrigation. Agron. J. 67: 185-190.10.2134/agronj1975.00021962006700020003x]Search in Google Scholar
[Brazaitytė A. 2000. Phytomonitoring investigations of physiology of tomato productivity and resistance. Scientic works of the Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture and Lithuanian University of Agriculture. Horticulture and Vegetable Growing 19(3): 25-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[De Rijck G., Schevens E. 1998. Distribution of nutrients and water in rockwool slabs. Scientia Horticulturae 72: 277-285.10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00144-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Diezma-Iglesias B., Valero C., Garcia-Ramoz F.J., Ruiz-Altisent M. 2006. Monitoring of firmness evaluation of peaches during storage by combing acoustic and impact methods. J. Food Eng. 77: 926-935.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.08.021]Search in Google Scholar
[Gallardo M., Thompson R.B., Valdez L.C., Fernández M.D. 2006. Use of stem diameter variations to detect plant water stress in tomato. Irrig. Sci. 24: 241-255.10.1007/s00271-005-0025-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Halevy S., Koth H., Guggenheim K. 1957. The vitamin and mineral content of fruits and vegetables grown in Israel. British Journal of Nutrition 11: 409-413.10.1079/BJN19570062]Search in Google Scholar
[Hernandez Suarez M., Rodriguez Rodriguez E.M., Diaz Romero C. 2007. Chemical composition of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) from Tenerife, the Canary Islands. Food Chemistry 106: 1046-1056.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ho L.C., Grange R.I., Picken A.S. J. 1987. An analysis of the accumulation of water and dry matter in tomato fruit. Plant Cell Environ. 10: 157-162.10.1111/1365-3040.ep11602110]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoffman G.J. 1986. Salinity. In: Trickle Irrigation for Crop Production. (F.S. Naukayama & D.A. Buks eds.). pp: 345-362.10.1016/B978-0-444-42615-4.50018-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Hsiao T.C. 1993. Growth and productivity of crops in relation to water status. Acta Hort. 335: 137-148.10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.335.15]Search in Google Scholar
[Jonson R.W., Dixon M.A., Lee D.R. 1992. Water relations of the tomato during fruit growth. Plant Cell Environ. 15: 947-953.10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01027.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Li Y.L. 2000. Analysis of greenhouse tomato production in relation to salinity and shoot environment. Ph.D. Dissertation. Wageningen University, Wageningen, 96 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oster J.D., Hoffman G.J., Robinson F.E. 1984. Dealing with salinity: Management alternatives: Crops, water, and soil. California Agriculture 38 (10): 29-32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Premuzic Z., Bargiela M., Garcia A., Rendina A., Lorio A. 1998. Calcium, iron, potassium, phosphorus, and vitamin C content of organic and hydroponic tomatoes. Horticultural Science 33: 255-257.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raffo A., La Malfa G., Fogliano V., Maiani G., Quaglia G. 2006. Seasonal variations in antioxidant components of cherry tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. Naomi F1). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 19: 11-19.10.1016/j.jfca.2005.02.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Simonneau T., Habib R., Goutouly J.P., Huguet J.G. 1993. Diurnal changes in stem diameter depend upon variations in water content: direct evidence in peach trees. J. Exp. Bot. 1531-1532.10.1093/jxb/44.3.615]Search in Google Scholar
[Tabatabaie S.J., Gregory P.J., Hadley P. 2004. Uneven distribution of nutrients in the root zone affects the incidence of blossom end rot and concentration of calcium and potassium in fruits of tomato. Plant Soil 258: 169-178.10.1023/B:PLSO.0000016548.84566.62]Search in Google Scholar
[Thybo A.K., Edelenbos M., Christensen L.P., Sorensen J.N., Thorup-Kristensen K. 2006. Effect of organic growing system on sensory quality and chemical composition of tomatoes. J. Food Sci. Technology 39: 835-843.10.1016/j.lwt.2005.09.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Ton Y., Nilov N., Kopyt M. 1997. Phytomonitoring: a new information technology for improving crop production. Abstr. 3rd International Symposium on Sensors in Horticulture, Tiberias, Israel, August 17-21. pp.: 56-57.]Search in Google Scholar
[Toor R.K., Savage G.P., Lister C.E. 2006. Seasonal variations in the antioxidant composition of greenhouse grown tomatoes. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 19: 1-10.10.1016/j.jfca.2004.11.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Willumsen J., Petersen K.K., Kaack K. 1996. Yield and blossom-end rot of tomato as affected by salinity and cation activity ratios in the root zone. J. Hort. Sci. 71(1): 81-98.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zekki H., Gary C., Gosselin A., Gauthier L. 1999. Validation of photosynthesis model through the use of the CO2 balance of greenhouse tomato canopy. Annals of Botany 84: 591-598.10.1006/anbo.1999.0938]Search in Google Scholar