[Vegar-Zubovic S, Kristic S, Lincender L. Magnetic resonance urography in children - when and why? Radiol Oncol 2011; 45: 174-9.10.2478/v10019-011-0023-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Miklos M, Gajski G, Garaj-Vrhovac V. Usage of the standard and modified comet assay in assessment of DNA damage in human lymphocytes after exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiol Oncol 2009; 43: 97-107.10.2478/v10019-009-0015-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Apaydin M, Varer M, Oztekin O. Radiological considerations in von Hippel- Lindeau disease: imaging findings and the review of the literature. Radiol Oncol 2010; 44: 164-7.10.2478/v10019-010-0014-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Kachanov DY, Dobrenkov KV, Shamanskaya TV, Abdullaev RT, Inushkina EV, Savkova RF, et al. Solid tumors in young children in Moscow Region of Russian Federation. Radiol Oncol 2008; 42: 39-44.10.2478/v10019-007-0037-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Khrichenko D, Darge K. Functional analysis in MR urography - made simple. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40: 182-99.10.1007/s00247-009-1458-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Avni EF, Bali MA, Regnault M, Damry N, Degroot F, Metens T, et al. MR urography in children. Eur J Radiol 2002; 43: 154-66.10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00112-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Grattan-Smith JD, Jones RA. MR urography in children. Pediatr Radiol 2006; 36: 1119-32; quiz 228-9.10.1007/s00247-006-0222-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Vivier PH, Blondiaux E, Dolores M, Marouteau-Pasquier N, Brasseur M, Petitjean C, et al. [Functional MR urography in children]. [French]. Journal de Radiologie 2009; 90: 11-9.10.1016/S0221-0363(09)70073-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Vivier PH, Dolores M, Taylor M, Dacher JN. MR urography in children. Part 2: how to use ImageJ MR urography processing software. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40: 739-46.10.1007/s00247-009-1536-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Grattan-Smith JD, Little SB, Jones RA. MR urography in children: how we do it. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38 Suppl 1: S3-17.10.1007/s00247-007-0618-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Leyendecker JR, Barnes CE, Zagoria RJ. MR urography: techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics 2008; 28: 23-46; 46-7.10.1148/rg.281075077]Search in Google Scholar
[Grattan-Smith JD, Perez-Bayfield MR, Jones RA, Little S, Broecker B, Smith EA, et al. MR imaging of kidneys: functional evaluation using F-15 perfusion imaging. Pediatr Radiol 2003; 33: 293-304.10.1007/s00247-003-0896-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Cengiz M, Baysal Z, Ganidagli S. Oral sedation with midazolam and diphenhydramine compared with midazolam alone in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. Paediatr Anaesth 2006; 16: 621-6.10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005.01820.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin TF, Yeh YC, Yen YH, Wang YP, Lin CJ, Sun WZ. Antiemetic and analgesic- sparing effects of diphenhydramine added to morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 835-9.10.1093/bja/aei137]Search in Google Scholar
[Ring E, Riccabona M, Fotter R. Normal values: pediatric uroradiology. Berlin: Springer; 2008. p. 507-14.10.1007/978-3-540-33005-9_28]Search in Google Scholar
[Riccabona M, Simbrunner J, Ring E, Ruppert-Kohlmayr A, Ebner F, Fotter R. Feasibility of MR urography in neonates and infants with anomalies of the upper urinary tract. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1442-50.10.1007/s00330-001-1180-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Nolte-Ernsting CC, Staatz G, Tacke J, Gunther RW. MR urography today. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28: 191-209.10.1007/s00261-001-0187-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Garcia-Valtuille R, Garcia-Valtuille AI, Abascal F, Cerezal L, Arguello MC. Magnetic resonance urography: a pictorial overview. Br J Radiol 2006; 79: 614-26.10.1259/bjr/21075982]Search in Google Scholar
[Nolte-Ernsting CC, Adam GB, Gunther RW. MR urography: examination techniques and clinical applications. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 355-72.10.1007/s003300000685]Search in Google Scholar
[Roy C, Saussine C, Guth S, Horviller S, Tuchmann C, Vasilescu C, et al. MR urography in the evaluation of urinary tract obstruction. Abdom Imaging 1998; 23: 27-34.10.1007/s002619900279]Search in Google Scholar
[O'Malley ME, Soto JA, Yucel EK, Hussain S. MR urography: evaluation of a three-dimensional fast spin-echo technique in patients with hydronephrosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 387-92.10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016213]Search in Google Scholar
[Szopinski K, Szopinska M, Borowka A, Jakubowski W. Magnetic resonance urography: initial experience of a low-dose Gd-DTPA-enhanced technique. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1158-64.10.1007/s003309900112]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes J, Jan W, Goodie J, Lund R, Rankin S. MR urography: evaluation of different techniques in non-dilated tracts. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 989-94.10.1053/crad.2002.1070]Search in Google Scholar
[Sudah M, Vanninen R, Partanen K, Heino A, Vainio P, Ala-Opas M. MR urography in evaluation of acute flank pain: T2-weighted sequences and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional FLASH compared with urography. Fast low-angle shot. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 105-12.10.2214/ajr.176.1.1760105]Search in Google Scholar
[Borthne A, Pierre-Jerome C, Nordshus T, Reiseter T. MR urography in children: current status and future development. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 503-11.10.1007/s003300050085]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomsen HS, Marckmann P. Extracellular Gd-CA: differences in prevalence of NSF. Eur J Radiol 2008; 66: 180-3.10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.024]Search in Google Scholar
[Abraham JL, Thakral C, Skov L, Rossen K, Marckmann P. Dermal inorganic gadolinium concentrations: evidence for in vivo transmetallation and longterm persistence in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Br J Dermatol 2008; 158: 273-80.10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08335.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin DR, Sharma P, Salman K, Jones RA, Grattan-Smith JD, Mao H, et al. Individual kidney blood flow measured with contrast-enhanced first-pass perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2008; 246: 241-8.10.1148/radiol.2461062129]Search in Google Scholar