[1. AirClim (2011) Air pollution from ship. Air Pollution & Climate Secretariat Seas at Risk Bellona Foundation, North Sea Foundation Transport & Environment European Environmental Bureau. - https://www.transportenvironment.org/publications/air-pollution-ships-0, last accessed 2016/05/21.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Barro, R.J. (1991) Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106:40755.10.2307/2937943]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Blind, K. (2012) The influence of regulations on innovation: A quantitative assessment for OECD countries. Research Policy, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 391-400.10.1016/j.respol.2011.08.008]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bourlès, R., Cette, G., Lopez, J., Mairesse, J. and Nicoletti, G. (2013) Do product market regulations in upstream sectors curb productivity growth? Panel data evidence for OECD countries. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 95, No. 5, pp. 1750-1768.10.1162/REST_a_00338]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Charité, D., Kirkegaard, P., Svensson, G. and Greve, J. (2015) Das Standard-Kostenmodell – Konzept zur Definition und Quantifizierung des Verwaltungsaufwandes für Unternehmen durch staatliche Regulierung.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Clark, V.L.P., Creswell, J.W., Green, D.O.N. and Shope, R.J. (2008) Mixing quantitative and qualitative approaches. Handbook of emergent methods, 363.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Coase, R. (1998) The new institutional economics. The American Economic Review, Vol. 88(2), pp.72-74.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. EfficienSea2 (2016) Report on the available technologies and sensors that can be utilized in the new system and on a business model on incentives for monitoring and enforcement. - http://efficiensea2.org/publications/. Accessed on 12/08/2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Eiteman, D.K., Stonehill, A.I., and Moffett, M.H. (2007) Fundamentals of multinational business finance. Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. EU Directive (2014) 2014/94/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure. Official Journal of the European Union, L307/1-20]Search in Google Scholar
[11. European Union (2015) Commission implementing the decision (EU) 2015/253 of 16 February 2015 laying down the rules concerning the sampling and reporting under Council Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the sulphur content of marine fuels, February 17, 2015, - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32015D0253, access on 12/02/2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. European Union (2018) Report on implementation and compliance with the sulphur standards for marine fuels set out in Directive (EU) 2016/802 relating to a reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels, Brussels, 16.4.2018, COM (2018) 188 final.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Fung, F. (2016) Enforcement of Fuel Switching Regulations – Practices adopted in the US, EU and other regions, and lessons learned for China. NRDC.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Gillham, B. (2000) Case study research methods. Bloomsbury Publishing]Search in Google Scholar
[15. HELCOM (2018) Maritime Assessment 2018, “HELCOM Assessment on maritime activities in the Baltic Sea 2018”, Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No.152. Helsinki Commission, Helsinki. 253pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Hunke, K., Prause, G. (2014) Sustainable supply chain management in German automotive industry: experiences and success factors. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 3 (3), 15−22.10.9770/jssi.2014.3.3(2).10.9770/jssi.2014.3.3(2)]Search in Google Scholar
[17. IMO (2013) Sulphur oxides (SOx)—Regulation 14. http://www.imo.org/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Pages/Sulphur-oxides-(SOx).Regulation-14.aspx. Accessed 2016-09-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. IMO (2014) Third IMO GHG Study, International Maritime Organisation, London, UK (2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[19. IMO (2016) IMO sets 2020 date for ships to comply with low sulphur fuel oil requirement. Press briefing release, - http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/MEPC-70-2020sulphur.aspx. Accessed 2016/11/30.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. ISL (2010) Reducing the sulphur content of shipping fuels further to 0.1% in the North Sea and Baltic Sea in 2015: Consequences for Shipping in this Area. Commissioned by the German Shipowners Association and Association of German Seaport Operators. Institute of Shipping Economics and Logistics, Bremen.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Jaffe, A.B., Peterson, S.R., Portney, P.R. and Stavins, R.N. (1995) Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of US manufacturing: what does the evidence tell us? Journal of Economic Literature, Vol 33, No. 1, pp. 132-163.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Jiang L., Kronbak J., Christensen L.P. (2014) The costs and benefits of sulphur reduction measures: Sulphur scrubbers versus marine gas oil. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 28, pp. 19–27.10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.005]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Keskonna inspektsioon (2017) - www.kki.ee, Tallinn, accessed on 27/06/2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999) A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 67-93.10.2307/249410]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Marshall, C. (1995) Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Calif.; London: Thousand Oaks, Calif.; London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Martin, R. and Sunley, P. (1998) Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development. Economic geography, 74(3), 201-227.10.2307/144374]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Mkansi, M., Acheampong, E.A., Qi, B. and Kondadi, K.R. (2012) Research philosophical debates and classifications: Students’ dilemma’. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK, pp. 277-284.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Notteboom, T. (2010) The impact of low sulphur fuel requirements in shipping on the competitiveness of roro shipping in Northern Europe. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 63–95.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. O’Leary, Z. (2017) The essential guide to doing your research project. Los Angeles, [Calif.]; London: Los Angeles, Calif.; London: SAGE.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. OECD (2005) Network, Standard Cost Model. International standard cost model manual. Measuring and reducing administrative burdens for businesses.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. OECD/ITF (2016) Reducing Sulphur Emissions from Ships: The Impact of International Regulation. - http://www.itf-oecd.org/reducing-sulphur-emissions-ships-impact-international-regulation accessed on 10/06/2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Olaniyi, E. O. and Reidolf, M. (2015) Organisational Innovation Strategies in the Context of Smart Specialization. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 213−227.10.9770/jssi.2015.5.2(7)]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Olaniyi, E., Prause, G. and Boyesen, J. (2018b) The impact of SECA regulations on clean shipping in the BSR. In: Ölçer, A, Kitada, O., Dalaklis, D., Ballini, F., (eds.) Trends and Challenges in Maritime Energy Management book series of WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs. Vol 6 (1) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-74576-3. Springer international publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-74576-3.]Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar
[34. Olaniyi, E.O. and Prause, G. K. (2016) Baltic-Russian Innovation Cooperation in the Context of EU Eastern Partnership. In T. Kerikmäe & A. Chochia (Eds.), Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy. Switzerland, Springer International Publishing, pp.257-279.10.1007/978-3-319-27383-9_17]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Olaniyi, E.O., Atari, S. and Prause, G. (2018c) Maritime energy contracting for clean shipping. Transport and Telecommunication, 19 (1), 31−44.10.2478/ttj-2018-0004 (2018).10.2478/ttj-2018-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Olaniyi, E.O., Gerber, P. and Prause, G. (2018a) Strategic Energy Partnership in Shipping. In: Kabashkin, I., Yatskiv, I., Prentkovskis, O. (Ed.). Reliability and Statistics in Transportation and Communication (102−111). Berlin: Springer (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems; 36).10.1007/978-3-319-74454-4_10]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Prause, G., Hunke, K. (2014) Sustainable Entrepreneurship along green corridors. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, Vol. 1 (3), 124−133, 10.9770/jesi.2014.1.3 (1).10.9770/jesi.2014.1.3(1)]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Rebelo, S. (1991). Long-run policy analysis and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No.3, pp. 500-521.10.1086/261764]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Renda, A., Schrefler, L., Luchetta, G. and Zavatta, R. (2013) Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Regulation. Brüssel: Centre for European Policy Studies. Online erhältlich unter - http://ec.Europa.eu/smartregulation/impact/commission_guidelines/docs/131210_cba_study_sg_final.Pdf, on accessed 01/06/2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Scandlines (2017) Annual Report, Copenhagen - https://www.scandlines.com/about-scandlines/about-scandlines-frontpage/finance, accessed on 29/062018.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Solow, R.M. (1994) Perspectives on growth theory. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8(81) pp. 45-54.10.1257/jep.8.1.45]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Unctad (2015) Legal Issues and Regulatory Developments Ship-source pollution and protection of the environment, - unctad.org/en/PublicationChapters/rmt2015ch5_en.pdf Feb 25, 2015 - Chapter 5: legal issues and regulatory developments.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Wegrich, K. (2009) The administrative burden reduction policy boom in Europe: comparing mechanisms of policy diffusion. Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation, London School of Economics and Political Science.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Wiśnicki, B., Czermański, E., Droździecki, S., Matczak, M. and Spangenberg, E. (2014) Sulphur Regulation–technology solutions and economic consequences for the Baltic Sea Region shipping market. In: Ernest Czermański (ed.) Institute of Maritime Transport and Sea-borne Trade, University of Gdańsk.]Search in Google Scholar
