[Altmann, G. T., M., Kamide, Y., 1999. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 247–264.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Aylett, M.,Turk, A., 2004. The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: An explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, vol. 47, no.1, pp. 31 – 56.10.1177/00238309040470010201]Search in Google Scholar
[Bard, E. G., Anderson, A., H, Sotillo, C., Aylett, M., Doherty-Sneddon, G. and Newlands, A., 2000. Controlling the intelligibility of referring expressions in dialogue. Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 42, pp. 1 – 22.10.1006/jmla.1999.2667]Search in Google Scholar
[Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. and Walker, S., 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models using lme4. Journal of Statistics Software, vol. 67, no. 1, pp.-1–48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01]Search in Google Scholar
[Bell, A, Brenier, J.M., Gregory, M. L., Girand, C. and Jurafsky, D., 2009. Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 60, pp. 92 – 111.10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Bentz, C., Ferreri Cancho, R., 2016. Zipfs law of abbreviation as a language universal. Paper presented at The Leiden Workshop on Capturing Phylogenetic Algorithms for Linguistics. Leiden, The Netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bickerton, D., 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor: Karoma.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bohnemeyer, J., Swift, M., 2004. Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 263 – 296.10.1023/B:LING.0000023371.15460.43]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bybee, J. L., Scheibman. J., 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: the reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 575 – 596.10.1515/ling.37.4.575]Search in Google Scholar
[Bybee, J. L., 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.9]Search in Google Scholar
[Bybee, J. L., 1994. The grammaticization of zero: asymmetries in tense and aspect systems. In: W. Pagliuca, ed. Perspectives on grammaticalization, vol. 109. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 235 – 254.10.1075/cilt.109.02byb]Search in Google Scholar
[Celano, G. G. A., Richter, M., Voll, R. and Heyer, G., 2018. Aspect coding asymmetries of verbs: The case of Russian. In: A. Barbaresi, H. Biber, F. Neubarth, R. Osswald. (eds.) KONVENS 2018. PROCEEDINGS of the 14th Conference on Natural Language Processing, pp. 34 – 39]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen Priva, U., 2008. Using information content to predict phone deletion. Paper presented at The 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. University of California, Los Angeles, May 16 – 18, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[Croft, W., 2003. Typology and universals. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840579]Search in Google Scholar
[Croft, W., 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Demberg, V., Keller, F. and Koller. A., 2013. Incremental, predictive parsing with psycholinguistically motivated tree-adjoining grammar. Computational Linguistics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1025–1066.10.1162/COLI_a_00160]Search in Google Scholar
[Fenk-Oczlon, G., 1990. Ikonismus versus Ökonomieprinzip: Am Beispiel russischer Aspekt- und Kasusbildungen. Papiere zur Linguistik, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 49 – 69.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fowler, C. A., 1988. Differential shortening of repeated content words produced in various communicative contexts. Language and Speech, vol. 31, pp. 307 – 319.10.1177/002383098803100401]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fowler, C. A., Housum. J., 1987. Talkers’ signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, vol. 26, pp. 489 – 504.10.1016/0749-596X(87)90136-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenberg, J. H., 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In: J. H. Greenberg, ed. Universals of language. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press, pp. 73 – 113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenberg, J.H., 1966. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gregory, M. L., Raymond, W. D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E. and Jurafsky, D., 1999. The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. Chicago Linguistics Society (CLS-99), vol. 35, pp. 151 – 166.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hale. J., 2001. A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. Paper presented at NAACL. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 2-7 June 2001.10.3115/1073336.1073357]Search in Google Scholar
[Haspelmath, M., 2008. Creating economical patterns in language change. In: J. Good, ed. Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185–214.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Haspelmath, M., Calude, A., Spagnol, M., Narrog, H. and BamyacÌ, E., 2014. Coding causal-noncausal verb alternations: A form-frequency correspondence explanation. Journal of Linguistics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 587–625.10.1017/S0022226714000255]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Haspelmath, M., Karjus, A., 2017. Explaining asymmetries in number marking: Singulatives, pluratives and usage frequency. Linguistics, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1213–1235.10.1515/ling-2017-0026]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawkins, S., Warren, P., 1994. Implications for lexical access of phonetic influences on the intelligibility of conversational speech. Journal of Phonetics, vol. 22, pp. 493 – 511.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30297-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jaeger, T. F. 2010. Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage information density. Cognitive Psychology, vol. 61, no 1. pp. 23–62.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.02.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Jakobson, R., 1939. Signe zéro. Mélanges linguistiques offerts à Charles Bally, pp. 143 – 152. Genève.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johanson, L., 2000. Viewpoint operators in European languages. In: Ö. Dahl, ed. Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 27–187.10.1515/9783110197099.1.27]Search in Google Scholar
[Levshina, N., 2017. Communicative efficiency and syntactic predictability: A crosslinguistic study based on the Universal Dependencies corpora. Paper presented at The NoDaLiDa 2017 Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW 2017). Gothenburg, Sweden, May 22 – 24, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levy, R., Jaeger, T. F., 2007. Speaker Optimize Information Density Through Syntactic Reduction. Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS).10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0111]Search in Google Scholar
[Levy, R. 2008. Expectation–based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 1126–77.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Levy, R. 2013. Memory and Surprisal in Human Sentence Comprehension. In: R. van Gompel, ed. Sentence Processing. Hove: Psychology Press, pp. 78–114.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, B., Cheng, J., Liu, Y. and Keller, F., 2018. Dependency Grammar Induction with a Neural Variational Transition-based Parser. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.05889]Search in Google Scholar
[Nivre, J., Agic ́ Ž., Ahrenberg, L. et al., 2017. Universal Dependencies 2.0–CoNLL 2017 Shared Task Development and Test Data, LIN-DAT/CLARIN digital library at the Institute of Formal and Applied Linguistics (ÃŽFAL), Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Prague.]Search in Google Scholar
[Piantadosi, S.T., Tily, H. and Gibson, E., 2011. Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. PNAS, vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 3526–3529.10.1073/pnas.1012551108]Search in Google Scholar
[Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M. and Baayen, H., 2005. Articulatory planning is continuous and sensitive to informational redundancy. Phonetica, vol. 62, no. 2-4, pp. 146–159.10.1159/000090095]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ramm, A., Loáiciga, S., Friedrich, A. and Fraser, A., 2017. Annotating tense, mood and voice for English, French and German. Paper presented at The 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, demo session (ACL). Vancouver, Canada, July 3–August 2, 2017.10.18653/v1/P17-4001]Search in Google Scholar
[Sagae. K., Tsujii, J., 2007. Dependency Parsing and Domain Adaptation with LR Models and Parser Ensembles. Proceedings of the CoNLL 2007 Shared Task in the Joint Conferences on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL’07 shared task), pp. 1044–1050. Prague, Czech Republic.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sasse, H.-J., 2006. Aspect and Aktionsart. In: E. K. Brown, ed. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Boston: Elsevier, pp. 535–538.10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00261-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Shannon, C., E., Weaver, W.,1948. A mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, 379–423, pp. 623–656.10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Velupillai, V., 2012. Zero coding in tense-aspect systems of creole languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zipf, G. K., 1936. The Psychobiology of Language. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zipf, G. K., 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. New York: Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar