The framing of climate change discourse by Statoil

Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A., 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 26, no.1, pp. 611-639.10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611Search in Google Scholar

Benn, S., Dunphy, D. and Griffiths, A., 2014. Organizational change for corporate sustainability. London/NY: Routledge.10.4324/9781315819181Search in Google Scholar

Benjamin, D., Han-Hui, P. and Budescu, D., 2016. Climate change versus global warming: Who is susceptible to the framing of climate change? Environment and Behavior, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 745-770.10.1177/0013916516664382Search in Google Scholar

Berbes-Blazques, M., C. et al., 2017. Understanding climate change and resilience: assessing strengths and opportunities for adaptation in the Global South. Climatic Change, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 227-241.10.1007/s10584-017-1897-0Search in Google Scholar

Chong, D. and Druckman, J. N., 2007. A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 99-118.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.xSearch in Google Scholar

Cook, J. et al., 2013. Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1-8.Search in Google Scholar

Cornelissen, J. P., Holt, R. and Zundel, M., 2011. The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimization of strategic change. Organization Studies, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1701–1716.10.1177/0170840611425729Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cranmer, G. A., Bowman, N. D. and Goldman, Z. W., 2017. A preliminary study of racialized brawn and brain framing effects. Communication Research Reports, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 78-83.10.1080/08824096.2016.1224165Search in Google Scholar

Curran, G., 2017. Social licence, corporate social responsibility and coal seam gas: framing the new political dynamics of contestation. Energy Policy, vol.101, pp. 427-435.10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.042Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, T., 2017. Verbal and visual framing activity in climate change discourse. The role of language in the climate change debate, 13, pp. 29-46.10.4324/9781315456935-2Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, T., 2015. Contested science in the media: Linguistic traces of news writers’ framing activity. Written Communication, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 39-65.10.1177/0741088314557623Search in Google Scholar

De Vries, G., Terwell, B.W. and Ellemers, N., 2015. Perceptions of manipulation and judgements of illegitimacy: Pitfalls in the use of emphasis framing when communicating about CO2 capture and storage. Environmental Communication, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 206-226.10.1080/17524032.2015.1047884Search in Google Scholar

Doyle, J., 2007. Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Science and Culture, vol. 16, no. 2, pp.129-150.10.1080/09505430701368938Search in Google Scholar

Entman, R. M., 1993. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 51-58.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fløttum, K. and Gjerstad, Ø., 2017. Narratives in climate change discourse. WIREs Climate Change, vol. 8, pp. 1-15.10.1002/wcc.429Search in Google Scholar

Garcia, M.M., 2011. Perception is truth: How US newspapers framed the ‘Go Green’ conflict between BP and Greenpeace. Public Relations Review, vol. 37, pp. 57-59.10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Gebara, M. F. et al., 2017. Framing REDD+ in the Brazilian national media: how discourses evolved amid global negotiation uncertainties. Climate Change, vol. 1, pp. 1-14.Search in Google Scholar

Goffman, E., 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gonenc, H. and Scholtens, B., 2017. Environmental and financial performance of fossil fuel firms: a closer inspection of their interaction. Ecological Economics, vol. 132, pp. 307-328.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.004Search in Google Scholar

Graham, C., 2017. The future is not what it used to be: oil and gas strategies for a carbon-conscious world. The APPEA Journal, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 459-461.10.1071/AJ17017Search in Google Scholar

Hurlstone, M. J. et al., 2017. Cooperation studies of catastrophe avoidance: implications for climate negotiations. Climatic Change, vol.140, pp. 119–133.10.1007/s10584-016-1838-3Search in Google Scholar

Jaspal, R. and Nerlich, B., 2014. When climate science became climate politics: British media representations of climate change in 1988. Public Understanding of Science, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 122-141.10.1177/0963662512440219Search in Google Scholar

Kapranov, O., forthcoming. Shell’s image of climate change and its representations in the British financial press. In W. Giordano (ed.). Discourse, communication and the enterprise: Where Business meets language. Cambridge Scholar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Kapranov, O., 2017. Conceptual metaphors associated with climate change in corporate reports in the fossil fuels market. Two perspectives from the United States and Australia. In: K. Fløttum (ed.) The role of language in the climate change debate. London/NY: Taylor & Francis, pp. 102-122.10.4324/9781315456935-6Search in Google Scholar

Kapranov, O., 2017a. British Petroleum’s corporate discourse involving climate change before and after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: A cognitive linguistic account. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, vol. 22, pp. 211-223Search in Google Scholar

Kapranov, O., 2016. Corpus analysis of discourse markers in corporate reports involving climate change. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, vol.1, pp. 216-227.Search in Google Scholar

Kapranov, O., 2015. Do international corporations speak in one voice on the issue of global climate change: The case of British Petroleum and The Royal Dutch Shell Group. In C. Cem and K. Papaja, eds. Global perspectives on social sciences and humanities. Theory and practice Warsaw: LiF.Search in Google Scholar

Koteyko, N., Thelwall, M. and Nerlich, B., 2010. From carbon markets to carbon morality: Creative compounds as framing devices in online discourses on climate change mitigation. Science Communication, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 25-54.10.1177/1075547009340421Search in Google Scholar

Kropp, C. and Türk, J., 2017. Bringing climate change down to earth: Climate change governance from the bottom up. In: A. Esguerra et al., eds. Sustainability politics and limited statehood. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham., pp.179-210.10.1007/978-3-319-39871-6_8Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., 2006. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In D. Geeraerts, ed. Cognitive linguistics: Basic readings. Amsterdam: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 185-237.10.1515/9783110199901.185Search in Google Scholar

Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L. and Gaeth, G. J., 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, vol.76, no. 2, pp. 149-188.10.1006/obhd.1998.2804Search in Google Scholar

Livesey, S. M., 2002. Global warming wars: Rhetorical and discourse analytic approaches to Exxonmobil’s corporate public discourse. Journal of Business Communication, vol. 39, pp. 117-146.10.1177/002194360203900106Search in Google Scholar

Lopez Maestre, M.D., 2000. The business of cognitive stylistics: A survey of conceptual metaphors in business English. Atlantis, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 47-69.Search in Google Scholar

Lyon, T. P. and Montgomery, W., 2015. The means and end of greenwash. Organization and Environment, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 223-249.10.1177/1086026615575332Search in Google Scholar

Marhsall, G., 2007. Carbon detox: Your step-by-step guide to getting real about climate change. Hachette UK.Search in Google Scholar

Matejek, S. and Gössling, T., 2014. Beyond legitimacy: A case study of BP’s ‘green lashing’. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 120, no. 4, pp. 571-584.10.1007/s10551-013-2006-6Search in Google Scholar

Matthes, J. and Kohring, M., 2008. The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 258−279.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.xSearch in Google Scholar

Myers, T. A. et al., 2012. A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. A Letter. Climatic Change, vol. 113, pp. 1105–1112.10.1007/s10584-012-0513-6Search in Google Scholar

Nerlich, B. and Jaspal, R., 2013. UK media representations of carbon capture and storage: actors, frames and metaphors. Metaphor and the Social World, vol. 3, no.1, pp.35-53.10.1075/msw.3.1.02nerSearch in Google Scholar

Nilsen, T., 2017. Innovation from the inside out: Contrasting fossil and renewable energy pathways at Statoil. Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 28, pp. 50-57.10.1016/j.erss.2017.03.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nisbet, M. C., 2009. Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, vol. 51, no. 2, pp.12-23.10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23Search in Google Scholar

Scanlan, S. J., 2017. Framing fracking: scale-shifting and greenwashing risk in the oil and gas industry. Local Environment, vol. 22, no.11, pp. 1311-1337.10.1080/13549839.2017.1345877Search in Google Scholar

Schmid-Petri, H. and Arlt, D., 2016. Constructing an illusion of scientific uncertainty? Framing climate change in German and British print media. Communications, vol. 41, no.3, pp.265–289.10.1515/commun-2016-0011Search in Google Scholar

Shehata, A. and Hopmann, D. N., 2012. Framing climate change. Journalism Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 175-192.10.1080/1461670X.2011.646396Search in Google Scholar

Spence, A. and Pidgeon, N., 2010. Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome. Global Environmental Change, vol. 20, pp.656-667.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Starbird, K. et al., 2015. Social media, public participation, and the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 605-630.10.1080/10807039.2014.947866Search in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2001. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability_report_2001.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2002. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability_report_2002.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2003. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainable_report_2003.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2004. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainable_report_2004.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2005. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainable_report_2005.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2006. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability_report_2006.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2007. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability%202007.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2008. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Key_sustainability_performance_data_2008.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2009. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability%20report%202009.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2010. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability%20report%202010.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2011. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability%20report%202011.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2012. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability_report2012.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2013. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/SustainabilityReport.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2014. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017].Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/Sustainability_report_2014.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Statoil, 2015. Sustainability Report. [Accessed 1 February 2017]. Available at: https://www.statoil.com/content/dam/statoil/documents/sustainability-reports/statoil-sustainability-report-2015.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Swain, K. A., 2017. Mass Media Roles in Climate Change Mitigation. In W.-Y. Chen et al. (eds.), Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation (pp.169-208), DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-14409-2_6.10.1007/978-3-319-14409-2_6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Trenberth, K. E., 2012. Framing the way to relate climate extremes to climate change. Climatic Change, vol. 115, pp. 283-290.10.1007/s10584-012-0441-5Search in Google Scholar

Tynkkynen, N., 2010. A great ecological power in global climate policy? Framing climate change as a policy problem in Russian public discussion. Environmental Politics, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 179-195.10.1080/09644010903574459Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

https://www.statoil.com/en/how-and-why/sustainability/sustainability-reports.htmlSearch in Google Scholar