[ARONOFF, M., 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[BABBY, L.,1980. The syntax of surface case marking. Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics 1, pp.1-32.]Search in Google Scholar
[BAKER, M., 1985. The Mirror Principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry , vol.16, pp. 373-416.]Search in Google Scholar
[BALDI, P. and CUZZOLIN, P., 2009. New perspectives on historical latin syntax 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215465.1]Search in Google Scholar
[BERMUDEZ-OTERO, R., 2007. Morphological structure and phonological domains in Spanish denominal derivation. In: F. Martínez-Gil and S. Colina, eds. Optimality-theoretic studies in Spanish phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 278-311.10.1075/la.99.11ber]Search in Google Scholar
[BOBALJIK, J., 2008. Paradigms, optimal and otherwise: A case for skepticism. In: A. Bachrach and A. Nevins, eds. Inflectional identity. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, pp. 29-54.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHOMSKY, N., 1981. Lectures on governement and binding. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[CHOMSKY, N. and HALLE, M., 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.]Search in Google Scholar
[CSER, A. (to appear). The nature of phonological conditioning in Latin inflectional morphology. Acta Linguistica Hungarica.]Search in Google Scholar
[EMONDS, J., 1985. A unified theory of syntactic categories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110808513]Search in Google Scholar
[EMONDS, J., 1987. The invisible category principle. Linguistic Inquiry , vol.18, pp. 613-631.]Search in Google Scholar
[EMONDS, J., 2000. Lexicon and grammar: The English syntacticon. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110872996]Search in Google Scholar
[EMONDS, J., 2009. De declinationibus disputandum est. In : P. Karlík, ed. Development of language through the lens of formal linguistics. Munich: Lincom Europe, pp. 63-85.]Search in Google Scholar
[EMONDS, J., 2010. Case theory revisited: Nominative and accusative super case. In: A. Bičan, J. Klaška, P. Macurová a J. Zmrsliková, eds. Karlík a továrna na lingvistiku. Brno : Masaryk University Press, pp. 98-124.]Search in Google Scholar
[EMONDS, J., 2012. Blackjack! 21 arguments that Agreeing Adjectives are Derived Nominals. In: E. Torrego, ed. Of grammar, words and verses. In honor of Carlos Piera. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 171-200.10.1075/lfab.8.11emo]Search in Google Scholar
[EMONDS, J. and SPAELTI, P., 2005. Fully distributing morphology: The phonology and syntax of Latin case inflections. In: Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin 8. Kobe Shoin: Kobe Shoin, pp. 1-20.]Search in Google Scholar
[EMONDS, J. and OSTLER, R., 2006. Thirty years of double object debates. In: M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk, eds. The Blackwell companion to syntax. London: Blackwell Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[GOAD, H., 1993. On the configuration of height features. University of Southern California doctoral dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[GRIMSHAW, J., 1990. Argument structure. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[HALLE, M. and MARANTZ, A., 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In: K. Hale and S .J. Keyser, eds. The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 111-176.]Search in Google Scholar
[HALLE, M. and NEVINS, A., 2009. Rule application in phonology. In: Ch. Cairns and E. Raimy, eds. Representation and architecture in phonological theory. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, pp. 355-382.10.7551/mitpress/9780262182706.003.0018]Search in Google Scholar
[HENLE, R., 1945. Latin grammar. Revised Edition. Chicago: Loyola University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCARTHY, J., 2003. Comparative markedness. Theoretical Linguistics , vol. 29, pp. 1-51.10.1515/thli.29.1-2.1]Search in Google Scholar
[LARSON, R., 1985. Bare NP adverbials. Linguistic Analysis, vol. 18, pp. 595-621.]Search in Google Scholar
[PERLMUTTER, D., 1971. Deep and surface constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.]Search in Google Scholar
[RITTER, E., 1993. Where’s gender? Linguistic Inquiry, vol. 24, pp. 795-803.10.1016/0026-2692(93)90078-S]Search in Google Scholar
[RICE, K. and Avery, P., 1991. On the relationship between laterality and coronality. In: C. Paradis and J.-F. Prunet, eds. Phonetics and phonology 2: The special status of coronals. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 101-124.10.1016/B978-0-12-544966-3.50012-9]Search in Google Scholar
[SAPIR, E,. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt Brace.]Search in Google Scholar
[SPAELTI, P., 2004. Some phonological and morphological patterns in the Latin noun declension system. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin 7. Kobe Shoin: Kobe Shoin, pp. 131-137.]Search in Google Scholar
[STOCK, L., 1971. Langenscheidts kurzgrammatik latein. Berlin: Langenscheidt.]Search in Google Scholar
[VESELOVSKA, L., 2001. Agreement patterns of Czech group nouns and quantifiers. In N. Corver and H. van Riemsdijk, eds. Semi-lexical categories., Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[WHITNEY, W.D., 1889. Sanskrit grammar. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ]Search in Google Scholar
