À propos de cet article

Citez

1. Aerts D. (2000), Participating in the World: Research and Education in a Changing Society, in:Science, Technology and Social Change, The Orange Book of Einstein meets Magritte (eds. D.Aerts, S. Gutwirth, S. Smets and L. Van Langenhove), pp. 1-34, Dordrecht, Kluwer AcademicPublishers.10.1007/978-94-011-4706-4_1Search in Google Scholar

2. Aerts, D., (2001), Transdisciplinary and integrative sciences in sustainable development, in the Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems, Baldwin House, Aldates, Oxford;Search in Google Scholar

3. Adamsson, N., (2007), Interdisciplinary integration in complex product development: managerial implications of embedding software in manufactured goods. Machine Design. Stockholm, KTH Royal Institute of Technology. Doctoral thesis.Search in Google Scholar

4. Albert & Lukas, 1999), Knowledge spaces: Theories, empirical research, applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates10.4324/9781410602077Search in Google Scholar

5. Alptekin, S.E., (1995), “Smart Products - A Tool for Mechatronics Education”, Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Advances in Mechatronics - ICRAM’95, 14-16, Volume I, pp: 288-292.Search in Google Scholar

6. Alptekin, S.E.,, Pouraghabagher, R., McQuaid, P., Waldorf, D., (2001), Teaching Factory, Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education;Search in Google Scholar

7. Arvanitis, S., Sydow, N., Woerter, M., (2005), Is There Any Impact of University-Industry Knowledge Transfer of the Performance of Private Enterprises? An Empirical Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data, Zurich, Switzerland: Swiss Institute for Business Cycle Research.10.2139/ssrn.892571Search in Google Scholar

8. Barnet, R., (2000), Realizing the University in the Age of Supercomplexity, The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

9. Bernstein, J.H., (2015), Transdisciplinarity: A Review of Its Origins, Development, and Current Issues Journal of Research Practice Volume 11, Issue 1, Article R1, 2015 Review:Search in Google Scholar

10. Brandt, P.; Ernst, A.; Gralla, F.; Luedritz, C.; Lang, D.J.; Newig, J.; Reinert, F.; Abson, H.;von Wehrden, H.A, review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science, (2013). Ecol. Econ. 2013, 92, 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

11. Brazell, J., Elliot, H., Vanston, J., (2005), Mechatronics: Integrating Technology, Knowledge & Skills. http://system.tstc.edu/forecasting/techbriefs/mechatronics.asp.Search in Google Scholar

12. Brennenraedts, R.M., Bekkers, R., Verspagen, B., (2006), The different channels of university-industry knowledge transfer: Empirical evidence from Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven, the Netherlands, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies.Search in Google Scholar

13. Brown, J. S., Duguid, P., (1991), “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice; Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation,” Organization Science 2, No. 1, pp. 40–5710.1287/orsc.2.1.40Search in Google Scholar

14. Browning, T. R., Deyst, J. J. Eppinger, S. D., Whitney, D. E., (2002), Adding value in product development by creating information and reducing risk. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 49(4), pp.443-445.10.1109/TEM.2002.806710Search in Google Scholar

15. Buckley, F. J., (2000), Team Teaching: What, Why, and How? London: Sage Publications, Inc.10.4135/9781452220697Search in Google Scholar

16. Carayannis, E.G. & Campbell, D.F.J. (2006). Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters: A Comparative Systems Approach across the United States, Europe, and Asia. PraegerSearch in Google Scholar

17. Carryer, E., (1996), “Smart Products”, Presentation at Preparing the Leaders for Mechatronics Education Workshop, Cal Poly, June 1995. Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996, Proceedings of 26th Annual Conference, Volume 2, Issue, 6-9 Nov. pp. 975 – 979;Search in Google Scholar

18. Castells, M., (2001), Universities as dynamic systems of contradictory functions. In J. Muller, N. Cloete and S. Badat (eds). Challenge of globalization. South African Debates with Manuel Castells, pp. 206-224.Search in Google Scholar

19. Chisholm, L., (1997), Initial Transitions between Education, Training and Employment in Learning Society, International Bulletin of Youth Research, vol. 15, 1, pp. 6-16);Search in Google Scholar

20. Cook, S.D.N., Brown, J. S., (1999). “Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing”, Organization Science, 10(4), pp. 381-400.10.1287/orsc.10.4.381Search in Google Scholar

21. Covey, R., S., 2004, The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: Powerful Lessons in Personal Change, Paperback – November 9, 2004, New York Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

22. Christensen, B. T., Schunn, C. D., (2005). Spontaneous access and analogical incubation effects. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2), pp. 207-220.10.1207/s15326934crj1702&3_7Search in Google Scholar

23. Derry, S.J., Fischer, G. (2005), Toward a Model and Theory for Transdisciplinary Graduate Education, AERA Annual Meeting 2005, Symposium “Sociotechnical Design for Lifelong Learning: A Crucial Role for Graduate Education” April, pp. 1-28Search in Google Scholar

24. Doignon, J-P., Falmagne, J-C., (1999), Knowledge Spaces. Berlin: Springer, 1999.10.1007/978-3-642-58625-5Search in Google Scholar

25. Dominik, J.; Loizeau, J.L.; Thomas, R.L. Bridging the gaps between environmental engineering and environmental science education. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2003, 4, 17–24.Search in Google Scholar

26. Düntsch, I., Gediga, G., (1995), Skills and Knowledge Structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol. 48, pp. 9–27.10.1111/j.2044-8317.1995.tb01047.xSearch in Google Scholar

27. Ertas, A., (2010), Transdisciplinarity: Design, Process and Sustainability. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering and Science. Vol. 1, No: 1, pp. 30-48.Search in Google Scholar

28. Falkenberg, K.F., (2016), Circular Economy Model Key to Boosting European Economy. 2014. Available online: https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/articles/opinion/circular-economy-model-keyboosting-european-economy (accessed on 10 October 2016).Search in Google Scholar

29. Fantana, R.S, (2016), Dimensions of expert report complexity in intellectual /industrial property. Case study, Perspectives of Business Law Journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, November 2016, 147-160).Search in Google Scholar

30. Fischer, G., (2005), “From Reflective Practitioners to Reflective Communities, Proceedings of the HCI International Conference (HCII)”, Las Vegas, July 2005, (published on CD).Search in Google Scholar

31. Fortuin, I.K.P.J., Bush, S.R., (2010), Educating students to cross boundaries between disciplines and cultures and between theory and practice, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 11 (1), pp. 19-35, Emerald Group Publishing Limited)10.1108/14676371011010020Search in Google Scholar

32. Fotea, I., Pop, G.I., Vaduva, S., Fotea, S., (2012a), A transdisciplinary Approach to Business Education throughout Family Firms as Community of Practice, The 8th Balkan Region Conference on Engineering Education & 4th International Conference on Engineering & Business Education, pg. G159-165, 17-21 October, 2012, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania.Search in Google Scholar

33. Fotea, I., Fotea, S., Vaduva, S., Pop, G.I., (2012b), Fostering Entrepreneurial Learning in Family Business throughout Family Firms as Community of Practice, Approach-Case Study of Romanian Family Business, Economia Marche, Journal of Applied Economics, Vol. XXXI, No. 2, Nov. 2012).Search in Google Scholar

34. Fuller, S., 2003), The University: A social technology for producing universal knowledge, Technology in Society vol. 25, pp 217-234.10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00023-XSearch in Google Scholar

35. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., (1994), The New Production of Knowledge - The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, Sage, London.Search in Google Scholar

36. Gitt, W., (1997), In the Beginning Was Information, Christliche Literatur-Verbeitung e.V. Postfach, Bielefeld.Search in Google Scholar

37. Gomes, J.F., de Weerd-Nederhof, P.C., Pearson, A. & Cunha, M.P. (2003). „Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development.’ Technovation 23(3), pp. 185-192.10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00107-9Search in Google Scholar

38. Hall, E.T., (1959), The Silent Language, Fawcett Publications, Inc, Greenwich, (Le langage silencieux, Seuil, 1984).Search in Google Scholar

39. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E., (2004), Communities of networked expertise: Professional and educational perspectives. Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

40. Harashima, F., Tomizuka, M. and Fukuda, T., (1996), Mechatronics - “What Is It, Why, and How?” An Editorial”, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Vol. 1 (1), pp. 1-4Search in Google Scholar

41. Hargreaves, A., (2003), Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity, Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

42. Hildreth, P., Kimble, C., Wright, P., (2000), “Communities of Practice in the Distributed International Environment,” Journal of Knowledge Management 4, No. 1, 27–38.10.1108/13673270010315920Search in Google Scholar

43. Hildreth, P., M., Kimble, C., 2004, Knowledge Networks:Innovation through Communities of Practice, Idea Group Inc (IGI), pp. 330-33510.4018/978-1-59140-200-8Search in Google Scholar

44. Hugos, M., Hulitzky, D., (2011), Business in the Cloud: What every business needs to know about Cloud-Computing, John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey10.1002/9781119200253Search in Google Scholar

45. Jack, H., Sterian, A., (2002), Control with Embedded Computers and Programmable Logic Controllers. The Mechatronics Handbook, CRC PressSearch in Google Scholar

46. Jashapara A., (2011), Knowledge Management, an Integrated Approach, Pearson Education Limited, Edinburgh Gate Harlow Essex CM20 2JE, EnglandSearch in Google Scholar

47. Kaynak, O., (1996), A new perspective on engineering education in mechatronics age, Proceedings of FIE 1996 Conference, Session 8b4: Mechatronics Education, vol.2, pp.970-974.Search in Google Scholar

48. Lamancusa, J., Jorgensen, J., Zayas-Castro, J., (1997), The Learning Factory - A New Approach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum, Journal of Engineering Education, April, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 103-112.Search in Google Scholar

49. Langley, P., Simon, H.A., Bradshaw, G.L., Zytkow, J.M. (1987), Scientific Discovery. Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6090.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

50. Leonard, D., Sensiper, S., (1998), “The role of tacit knowledge in group innovation.” California Management Review, vol. 40(3), pp. 112-132.10.2307/41165946Search in Google Scholar

51. Lupasco, S., (1987), Le principe d’antagonisme et la logique de l’énergie - Prolégomènes à une science de la contradiction, Hermann & Cie. Colloque „Actualités scientifiques et industrielles”, no. 1133, Paris, 1951; 2nd ed., Le Rocher, Monaco. “Transdisciplinarité” Series, 2002Search in Google Scholar

52. Max Neef, M.A., (2005), Foundations of transdisciplinarity, Ecological Economics 53, pp. 5–16.Search in Google Scholar

53. McGregor, S.L.M., Volckmann, R., (2010), Transdisciplinarity in Higher Education, The Path of Arizona State University, Integral Leadership Review, vol.X, 3Search in Google Scholar

54. Montaud, A., (2008), Le monde de mecatroniques, Artema Mechatronics Infos 2008, pp. 1-2Search in Google Scholar

55. Montuori, A., 2006, The quest for a new education: From oppositional identities to creative inquiry. ReVision, vol. 28 (3), pp. 4-20).10.3200/REVN.28.3.4-20Search in Google Scholar

56. Mieg, H.A., (1996), Managing the interfaces between science, industry, and education, in UNESCO (ed), World Congress of Engineering Educators and Industry Leaders, UNESCO, Paris, vol. 1, pp.529-533Search in Google Scholar

57. Noe, R., 2008, Employee Training and Development. 4th Edn., Mcgraw-Hill/Irwin, ISBN: 0-07-340490-X, pp: 552.Search in Google Scholar

58. Novak, J.D. (1998), Learning, creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

59. Nicolescu, B., (1996), La transdisciplinarité, manifeste, Le Rocher, Monaco, coll. “Transdisciplinarité”; English translation by Karen-Claire Voss: Manifesto of Transdisciplinarity, State University of New York (SUNY) Press, New York, 2002 (English translation: Watersign Press, Lexington, USA; Ed. Polirom, Iaşi, 1999).Search in Google Scholar

60. Nicolescu, B. (1997). The transdisciplinary evolution of the university condition for sustainable development. http://perso.club-internet.fr/nicol/ciret/bulletin/b12/b12c8.htmSearch in Google Scholar

61. Nicolescu, B., (2006), Transdisciplinarity - Past, Present and Future, în Haverkort B., Reijntjes C., Moving Worldviews - Reshaping Sciences, Policies and Practices for Endogenous Sustainable Development, COMPAS Editions, Holland, pp 142-166.Search in Google Scholar

62. Nicolescu, B., (2008), Transdisciplinarity - Theory and Practice (Ed.), Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, USA.Search in Google Scholar

63. Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S. and Yanow, D. (eds.) (2003) Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-Based Approach. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Search in Google Scholar

64. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., (1994), “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organizational Science, vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 14–37.10.1287/orsc.5.1.14Search in Google Scholar

65. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., Hakkaraininen, K. (2004), Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, vol. 74(4), pp. 557-576.10.3102/00346543074004557Search in Google Scholar

66. Papoutsidakis, M.G., Andreou, I.K., Chamilotoris, G.E., (2008), Challenging educational platforms in mechatronics: learning framework and practice, Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS/IASME International Conference on Engineering Education, pp. 121-126.Search in Google Scholar

67. Palmer, S.E., (1978), Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation, in E. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 259–303Search in Google Scholar

68. Petts, J., Owens, S., Bulkeley, H., (2008), Crossing boundaries: interdisciplinarity in context of urban environments, Geoforum 39. pp. 593-601.Search in Google Scholar

69. Polanyi, M., (1997), “The Tacit Dimension,”Knowledge in Organizations, L. Prusak, Editor, Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA.10.1016/B978-0-7506-9718-7.50010-XSearch in Google Scholar

70. Pop, I. G., Mătieş, V., (2008a), A Transdisciplinary Approach to Knowledge in Mechatronical Education, 7th France-Japan and 5th Europe-Asia Mechatronics Congress, Anecy, May 21-23, pp. 195-198.Search in Google Scholar

71. Pop, I.G., (2009a), Creativity as a Reflexive Transdisciplinary Language in the Mechatronical Knowledge, “Problems of Education in the 21st Century”, Lithuania, vol.13 (13), pp. 94-102, may, 2009; 11, SMC “Scientia Educologica”, Lithuania, ISSN 1822-7864;Search in Google Scholar

72. Pop, I.G., (2009b), Considerations about the Transdisciplinary Knowledge Search Window in Mechatronical Education, The 5th Balkan Region Conference on Engineering Education & 2nd International Conference on Engineering and Business Education, October 15th-17th, pp. 159-165, University Lucian Blaga, Sibiu, Romania.Search in Google Scholar

73. Pop, I.G., Maties, V., (2011), Transdisciplinary Approach of the Mechatronics in the Knowledge Based Society, in Mechatronics, Intech Open Access Publisher, Rijeka.10.5772/20876Search in Google Scholar

74. Pop, I.G., (2011), Thesis, Considerations on the Transdisciplinary Approach of the Mechatronics in the Knowledge Based Society, Technical University, Cluj-Napoca, 2011.10.5772/20876Search in Google Scholar

75. Pop, I.G.; Talpos, M.F.; Prisac, I. (2015), Transdisciplinary Approach on the Advanced Sustainable Knowledge Integration, Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education. In Proceedings of the IETEC-BRCEBE Conference, Sibiu, Romania, 1–2 November 2015; Volume 1; ISSN (Online de Gruyter) 2391-8160. doi:10.1515/cplbu-2015-0025.10.1515/cplbu-2015-0025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

76. Pop, I.G., Văduva S., Talpoș M.F., (2017), Energetic Sustainability and the Environment: A Transdisciplinary, Economic–Ecological Approach Sustainability 2017, 9(6), 873; doi:10.3390/su906087310.3390/su9060873Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

77. Pop, N.Al.; Pelau, C. (2017): Correlations within the EFQM Business Excellence Model by Applying a Factor Analysis, in: Amfiteatru Economic, nr. 44/2017, pg. 28-40 (ISSN-1582 – 9146)Search in Google Scholar

78. Quinsee, S. & Hurst, J. (2005). Bluring Bounderies? Support Students and Staff within an Online Learning Environment? Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 6, Nr. 1, 52–59.Search in Google Scholar

79. Reason, P., (1998), Political, Epistemological, Ecological and Spiritual Dimensions of Participation, Culture and Organization, Vol.4, 2, pg.147-167.Search in Google Scholar

80. Roux, D. J., Rogers, K. H., Biggs, H. C., Ashton, P. J., Sergean, A., 2006, Bridging the science–management divide: moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing, Ecology and Society, V11 No 1: 4.10.5751/ES-01643-110104Search in Google Scholar

81. Scholz, R.W., Mieg, H.A., Oswald, J.E., (2000), Transdisciplinarity in Groundwater Management-towards Mutual Learning of Science and Society, Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 123, pp. 477-487.Search in Google Scholar

82. Šlaus, I., (2003), Political Significance of Knowledge in Southeast Europe, Croat. Med. Journal; vol.4, pp. 3-19.Search in Google Scholar

83. Strathern, M., (2007), „Knowledge Identities” in Ronald Barnett, Roberto di Napoli (eds), Changing Identities in Higher Education. Voicing Perspectives. Routlidge. London. New York.Search in Google Scholar

84. Sutz, J., K.E., (2000), The role of universities in knowledge production, Himalayan Journal of Sciences, 3(5), pp. 53-56.10.3126/hjs.v3i5.462Search in Google Scholar

85. Tiffin, J., Rajasingham, L., 2003), The Global Virtual University, London: Routledge Falmer);10.4324/9780203464670Search in Google Scholar

86. Ţundrea, E., (2009), Contributions to the Modelling and the Use of the Software Product Lines, Ph.D. Thesis, UPT, seria10, nr. 11, Editura Politehnica, Timisoara, Romania.Search in Google Scholar

87. Vajkai, A., (2002), „The role of Universities in Buildings the Information Societies, in University and Society. Curent problems of regional co-operation, Proceedings of the conference held at the University of Pecs.Search in Google Scholar

88. Waks, S. (1997), Lateral thinking and technology education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 6(4), pp. 245-255.10.1023/A:1022534310151Search in Google Scholar

89. Warfield, J. N., (2007), Enterprise Information Systems, Systems science serves enterprise integration: a tutorial, Taylor & Francis, Inc., Vol.1, (2), pp. 235-254.Search in Google Scholar

90. Weber, L., Bergan, S., (eds), 2005), The public responsibility for higher education and research. Council of Europe higher education series no. 2, Strassbourg, Council of Europe);Search in Google Scholar

91. Wenger, E., Snyder, B., (2000), “Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier,” Harvard Business Review vol. 78, No. 1, pp. 139–145.Search in Google Scholar

92. Zeleny, M., (1987), “Management Support Systems: Towards Integrated Knowledge Management”, Human Systems Management, vol. 7, 1, pp. 59-70.10.3233/HSM-1987-7108Search in Google Scholar