[Observator cultural, No. 102 (37) and 103 (38) / 2002.10.1002/j.1834-4453.2002.tb00512.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Observator cultural, Opinii despre o carte cu probleme: Omul recent. [Opinions about a book with problems: The Recent Man], No. 102 (37) / 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Observator cultural. Premiile Asociației Scriitorilor Profesioniști din România – ASPRO pentru anul editorial 2003. [Prizes of the Association of Professional Writers of Romania - ASPRO for the editorial year 2003]. No. 223 June 1, 2004 - June 7, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Adameșteanu, Gabriela (2014). Anii romantici. Amintiri, gânduri [The Romantic Years. Memories, Thoughts]. Iași: Polirom.]Search in Google Scholar
[Altafini, C. (2012). Dynamics of Opinion Forming in Structurally Balanced Social Networks. PLoS ONE 7(6): e38135. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038135.10.1371/journal.pone.0038135]Search in Google Scholar
[Andreescu, Gabriel (2010). 20 de ani de războaie culturale. Victoria junk-conservatorismului [20 years of cultural wars. The victory of junk-conservatism], In Matei, S. A., & Momescu, M. (eds.). Forum idols: Why a middle class spirit is preferable to the “elite” of public intellectuals. Indianapolis: Ideagora. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-54248-8, pp. 67-81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonacich, Phillip (1987). Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5 (Mar., 1987), pp. 1170-1182.10.1086/228631]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourdieu, Pierre (2015). Sociologie générale. Cours au Collège de France, (1981-1983), volume 1, Editions Raisons d’agir / Seuil, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourdieu, Pierre (2016) Sociologie générale. Cours au Collège de France, (1983-1986), volume 2, Paris: Editions Raisons d’agir/Seuil.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourdieu, Pierre (1984) [1979]. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Richard Nice, trans. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourdieu, Pierre (1992). Les règles de l’art. Genèse et structure du champ littéraire, Paris : Les éditions du Seuil.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bourdieu, Pierre (1994). «Strategies de reproduction et modes de domination», in Actes de la recherches en sciences sociales, nr. 105, dec. 1994.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ciubuc, Bogdan (2004). Cearta inteelctualilor [The Quarrel of the Intellectuals], Evenimentul zilei [Daily Event] of June 27, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Daloz, Jean-Pascal (2010). The Sociology of Elite Distinction. From Theoretical to Comparative Perspectives. Basigstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230246836]Search in Google Scholar
[DeNooy, Wouters (2002). The dynamics of artistic prestige. Poetics, 30(3):147-167. DeNooy, Wouters (2003). Fields and networks: correspondence analysis and social network analysis. Poetics, 31(5–6): 305-327.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dinu, Maria (2017). Ion Bogdan Lefter: Pumn de fier în mănușă de catifea [Ion Bogdan Lefter: Iron fist in velvet glove]. Mozaic, No. 3 /2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gheorghiu, Mihai Dinu (2007). Intelectualii în cîmpul puterii. Morfologii și traiectorii sociale. Iași: Polirom.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gheorghiu, Mihai Dinu (2005). Le Groupe de Dialogue Social et les intellectuels roumains « libres » après 1989. In Gheorghiu, Mihai Dinu (eds). (2003). Littérature et pouvoir symbolique, Bucuresti: Ed. Paralela 45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groza, Claudiu (2004). Turbarea intelectualilor [The Turbulence of the Intellectuels]. Clujeanul, Nr. 224/June, 28 – July, 5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Katz, Leo (1953). A New Status Index Derived from Sociometric Index. Psychometrika 18(1): 39–43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kurzman, Charles and Lynn Owens (2002). The Sociology of Intellectuals. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 63-90.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kurzman, Charles (2008). Democracy Denied, 1905-1915: Intellectuals and the Fate of Democracy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674039858]Search in Google Scholar
[Lavastine, Alexandra (2002). Cioran, Eliade, Ionesco: L’Oubli du fascisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France – PUF.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lazăr, Marius (2015). Writers, Intellectuals, Politics: The Transformation of the Cultural Field in Post-Communist Romania. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai. Sociologia (1):125-149, June 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liiceanu, Gabriel (1983). Jurnalul de la Păltiniș, București, Cartea Romanească.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liiceanu, Gabriel (1983). Jurnalul de la Păltiniș. Un model paideic in cultura umanista [The Journal of Păltiniș: A paideia model in humanistic culture] Bucharest: Romanian Book Publishing House.]Search in Google Scholar
[Livezeanu, Irina. (2003). Romania’s Cultural Wars: Intellectual Debates about the Recent Past, Working Papers Series of the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, March 27, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marcu, Luminița. (2004). Romanian intellectuals provoked from overseas, Evenimentul zilei [The Daily Event], May 2, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matei, Sorin. 2004. Boierii minţii. Intelectualii români între grupurile de prestigiu şi piaţa liberă a ideilor [Boyars of the mind. Romanian intellectuals between status groups and the free market of ideas], Bucharest: Compania.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patapievici, Horia Roman. (2001) Omul recent. O critica a modernității din perspectiva întrebării «Ce se pierde atunci când ceva se câștigă? »[The Recent Man. A critique of modernity by answering the question: «What is lost when something is won»]. Bucgharest: Humanitas Publishing House.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patapievici, Horia Roman (2002). Liberal or conservative?. In Revista 22, Vol. 622, No. 6, February 5-11, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patapievici, Horia Roman. (2004). Cetatea românească a încetat să mai fie o excepție patologica. Iolanda Malamen in dialog cu: Horia Roman Patapievici [The Romanian stronghold ceased to be a pathological exeption. Iolanda Malamen in dialog with Horia Roman Patapievici]. In Ziua, 15 mai.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pleșu, Andrei (2004). Replică [Reply]. Observator cultural, No. 226, June 22 – June 28, 2004.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runceanu, Camelia. (2008). «Grup de reflecție», grup solidar? Grupul pentru Dialog Social: o elită intelectuală în post-comunism. In Gheorghiu, Mihai Dinu, Lupu Mihăiță (eds), Mobilitatea elitelor în România secolului al XX-lea, Bucharest : Paralela 45, pp. 392-421.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sapiro, Gisèle (2009). Modèles d’intervention politique des intellectuels. Le cas français. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 1: 176-177.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sawyer, Kim Russell and Gygax, André (2019). An option-theoretic model of a reputation network. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 43(3): 123-146, DOI: 10.1080/0022250X.2018.1545769.10.1080/0022250X.2018.1545769]Search in Google Scholar
[Sawyer, Kim Russell and Gygax, André, (2018). Reputation As an Option (December 17). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3165409 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3165409.10.2139/ssrn.3165409]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, John (2000). Social Network Analysis: a Handbook, London: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verdery, Katherine (1991). National ideology under socialism. Identity and Cultural Politics in Ceausescu’s Romania, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520917286]Search in Google Scholar
[Wasserman, Stanley and Faust, Katherine (1994). Social Networks Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815478]Search in Google Scholar