[Bacon, Francis. 2000 [1605]. The advancement of learning. Edited by Michael Kiernan. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marston, John. 2012 [1602]. Antonio’s revenge. In Emma Smith (ed.), Five revenge tragedies, 160–217. London: Penguin Classics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Middleton, Thomas. 2012 [1607]. The revenger’s tragedy. In Emma Smith (ed.), Five revenge tragedies, 284–357. London: Penguin Classics.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peacham, Henry. 1593. The garden of eloquence, 2nd edn, sig. C2v. London: Richard Field.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shakespeare, William. 1972 [1603]. Hamlet. In Blakemore Evans (ed.), The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shakespeare, William. 1995 [1594]. Titus Andronicus. In Jonathan Bate (ed.), Titus Andronicus. The Arden Shakespeare, Third Series. London & New York, NY: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sherry, Richard. 1550. A treatise on schemes and tropes. London: John Day. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/28447/28447-h/28447-h.htm (accessed on 10th July 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Sidney, Philip. 2004 [1595]. The defence of poesy. In Gavin Alexander (ed.), Sidney’s ‘The Defence of Poesy’ and selected Renaissance literary criticism, 1–54. London: Penguin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barker, Francis, 1984. The tremulous private body. Essays on subjection. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bevington, David. 1962. From Mankind to Marlowe. Growth of structure in the popular drama of Tudor England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674734340]Search in Google Scholar
[Bayley, John. 1981. Shakespeare and tragedy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carlino, Andrea. 1999. Books of the body. Anatomical ritual and Renaissance learning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clare, Robert. 1997. Quarto and folio: A case for conflation. In James Ogden & Arthur H. Scouten (eds.), Lear from study to stage: Essays in criticism, 79–108. Madison, WI: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Colie, Rosalie L. 1974. Shakespeare’s living art. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dessen, Alan C. 1984. Elizabethan stage conventions and modern interpreters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554179]Search in Google Scholar
[Dessen, Alan C. 1995. Recovering Shakespeare’s theatrical vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051162746010.1017/CBO9780511627460]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Diehl, Huston. 1985. ‘To put us in remembrance’: The Protestant transformation of images of judgment. In David Bevington (ed.), Homo, Memento Finis: The iconography of just judgment in medieval art and drama, 179–208. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dollimore, Jonathan. 1984. Radical tragedy. Religion, ideology and power in the drama of Shakespeare and his contemporaries. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Döring, Tobias. 2006. Performances of mourning in Shakespearean theatre and early modern culture. Basingstoke & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230627406]Search in Google Scholar
[Elias, Norbert. 2000 [1939] The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. (Revised edition.) Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elton, W. R. 1986. Shakespeare and the thought of his age. In Stanley Wells (ed.), The Cambridge companion to Shakespeare studies, 17–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fawcett, Mary Laughlin. 1983. Arms/words/tears: Language and the body in Titus Andronicus. English Literary History 50(2). 261–277. DOI: 10.2307/287281610.2307/2872816]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Garbero, Maria Del Sapio, Nancy Isenberg & Maddalena Pennacchia. 2010. Questioning bodies in Shakespeare’s Rome. Göttingen: V&R Unipress.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goth, Maik. 2012. ‘Killing, hewing, stabbing, dagger-drawing, fighting, butchery’: Skin penetration in Renaissance tragedy and its bearing on dramatic theory. Comparative Drama 46(2). 139–162. DOI: 10.1353/cdr.2012.001610.1353/cdr.2012.0016]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Green, Douglas E. 1989. Interpreting ‘her martyr’d signs’: Gender and tragedy in Titus Andronicus. Shakespeare Quarterly 40(3). 317–326. DOI: 10.2307/287072610.2307/2870726]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gumbrecht, Hans U. 2003. Production of presence: What meaning cannot convey. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804767149]Search in Google Scholar
[Hillman, David. 2007. Shakespeare’s entrails: Belief, scepticism and the interior of the body. Basingstoke & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hillman, David & Carla Mazzio (eds.). 1997. The body in parts. Fantasies of corporeality in early modern Europe. New York, NY & London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Holmes, Jonathan & Adrian Streete. 2005. Introduction. In Jonathan Holmes & Adrian Streete (eds.), Refiguring mimesis: Representation in early modern literature, 1–15. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kendall, Gillian Murray. 1989. ‘Lend me thy hand’: Metaphor and mayhem in Titus Andronicus. Shakespeare Quarterly 40(3). 299–316. DOI: 10.2307/287072510.2307/2870725]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kiss, Attila. 1995. The semiotics of revenge. Subjectivity and abjection in English Renaissance tragedy. Szeged: Attila József University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Knapp, Robert. 1989. Shakespeare - The theater and the book. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, Erika T. 2012. Shakespeare and the materiality of performance. Basingstoke & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Luis-Martínez, Zenón. 2002. In words and deeds. The spectacle of incest in English Renaissance tragedy. Amsterdam & New York, NY: Rodopi.10.1163/9789004489608]Search in Google Scholar
[Marshall, Cynthia. 2002. The shattering of the self. Violence, subjectivity, and early modern texts. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maus, Katharine Eisaman. 1995. Inwardness and theater in the English Renaissance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Neill, Michael. 1997. Issues of death. Mortality and identity in English Renaissance tragedy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198183860.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780198183860.001.0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nunn, Hillary M. 2005. Staging anatomies: Dissection and spectacle in early Stuart tragedy. Farnham: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Owens, Margaret E. 2005. Stages of dismemberment. The fragmented body in late medieval and early modern drama. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollard, Tanya. 2010. Enclosing the body: Tudor conceptions of skin. In Kent Cartwright (ed.), A companion to Tudor literature, 111–122. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444317213.ch710.1002/9781444317213.ch7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sawday, Jonathan. 1995. The body emblazoned. Dissection and the human body in Renaissance culture. London & New York, NY: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schoenfeldt, Michael C. 1999. Bodies and selves in early modern England. Physiology and inwardness in Spenser, Shakespeare, Herbert, and Milton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, Molly Easo. 1996. Spectacles of torment in Titus Andronicus. Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900. 36(2). 315–331. DOI: 10.2307/45095110.2307/450951]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Spinrad, Phoebe S. 1987. The summons of death on the medieval and Renaissance English stage. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Streete, Adrian. 2009. Protestantism and drama in early modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051164230210.1017/CBO9780511642302]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sugg, Richard. 2007. Murder after death: Literature and anatomy in early modern England. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501729973]Search in Google Scholar
[Tempera, Mariangela. 1999. Feasting with centaurs. Titus Andronicus from stage to text. Bologna: CLUEB.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tricomi, Albert H. 1974. The aesthetics of mutilation in Titus Andronicus. Shakespeare Survey 27. 11–19. DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521204682.00210.1017/CCOL0521204682.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vickers, Brian. 1999. Introduction. In Brian Vickers (ed.), English Renaissance literary criticism, 1–57. Oxford: Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waldron, Jennifer E. 2013. Reformations of the body: Idolatry, sacrifice, and early modern theater. Basingstoke & New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137313126]Search in Google Scholar
[Weimann, Robert. 1996. Authority and representation in early modern discourse. Baltimore, MD & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801851902]Search in Google Scholar
[Wickham, Glynne. 1963. Early English stages. 1300 to 1600. Vol. 2: 1576 to 1660, Part One. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zimmerman, Susan. 2005. The early modern corpse and Shakespeare’s theatre. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748621033.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Žižek, Slavoj. 2000. The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. London & New York, NY: Verso.]Search in Google Scholar
