[Newdigate, Bernard H. & Bette Davis (eds.). 1947. The works of William Shakespeare gathered into one volume. London: The Shakespeare Head Press Odhams Press Ltd. and Basil Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crane, Gregory R. (ed.). The works of Christopher Marlowe. Perseus Collection. Perseus Digital Library Project. Tufts University. 31.07.2011 <http://www.perseus.tufts.edu> ]Search in Google Scholar
[Abbott, Edwin A. 1966. Shakespearian grammar. An attempt to illustrate some of the differences between Elizabethan and modern English. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blake, Norman Francis. 2002. A grammar of Shakespeare’s language. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bybee, Joan. 1988. Semantic substance vs. contrast in the development of grammatical meaning. Berkeley Linguistic Society 14. 247-264.10.3765/bls.v14i0.1785]Search in Google Scholar
[Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bybee, Joan & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.). 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.32]Search in Google Scholar
[Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.]Search in Google Scholar
[Denison, David. 1993. English historical syntax: Verbal constructions. New York: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ehrman, Madeline. 1966. The meanings of the modals in Present-Day American English (Janua Linguarum). The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/ling.1966.4.28.46]Search in Google Scholar
[Facchinetti, Roberta. 1993. Can vs. may in Early Modern English. In: Maurizio Gotti (ed.), 1993. English diachronic syntax, 209-221. Milan: Guerini Studio.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gotti, Maurizio, Marina Dossena, Richard Dury, Roberta Facchinetti & Maria Lima. 2002. Variation in central modals: A repertoire of forms and types of usage in Middle English and Early Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hogg, Richard. 2002. An introduction to Old English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kakietek, Piotr. 1972. Modal verbs in Shakespeare’s English. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kytö, Merja. 1987. On the use of the modal auxiliaries indicating ‘possibility’ in Early American English. In: Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (eds.), 1987. Historical development of auxiliaries, 145-170. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kytö, Merja. 1991. Variation and diachrony, with Early American English in focus: Studies on ‘can/may’ and ‘shall/will’. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leech, Geoffrey & Jennifer Coates. 1980. Semantic indeterminacy and the modals. In: Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik (eds.). 1980. Studies in English linguistics for Randolph Quirk, 79-90. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Palmer, Frank R. 1965. A linguistic study of the English verb. 1st edn. London: Longman. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmer, Frank R. 1974. A linguistic study of the English verb. 2nd edn. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmer, Frank R. 1990. Modality and the English modals. 2nd edn. New York: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmer, Frank R. 2001. Mood and modality. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Papafragou, Anna. 2000. Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Oxford: Elsevier.10.1163/9780585474199]Search in Google Scholar
[Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1972. A history of English syntax. A transformational approach to the history of English sentence structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Twaddell, W. F. 1963. The English verb auxiliaries. Providence, Rhode Island: Brown University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2001. Subjective and objective modality: Interpersonal and ideational functions in the English modal auxiliary system. Journal of Pragmatics 33. 1505-1528.10.1016/S0378-2166(01)00029-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Visser, Fredericus Th. 1978. An historical syntax of the English language. Part three. First half. Syntactical units with two verbs. Leiden: E. J. Brill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warner, Anthony R. 1990. Reworking the history of English auxiliaries. In: Sylvia Adamson, Vivien Law, Nigel Vincent & Susan Wright (eds.). 1990. Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Cambridge, 6-9 April, 1987, 537-558. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.65.30war]Search in Google Scholar
[Warner, Anthony R. 2003. English auxiliaries. Structure and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ]Search in Google Scholar
