<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

<p>As inhabitants of cavities, some owl species benefit from natural processes, different tree compositions and higher volumes of dead wood. We assumed that protected areas would have a positive impact on the owl community. We compared the abundance of calling owls on 22 lines in managed versus protected forests. Here, we recorded the acoustic communication of owls. The composition of the owl community did not differ between areas. However, we found the impact of forest landscape integrity index and altitude on the diversity of owls. Forests in protected areas probably need time to develop natural and heterogeneous habitat structures. The conservation priority should be to increase the integrity of the forests. Our results also confirmed that managed forests can have a high diversity of owls.</p>
</abstract>

As inhabitants of cavities, some owl species benefit from natural processes, different tree compositions and higher volumes of dead wood. We assumed that protected areas would have a positive impact on the owl community. We compared the abundance of calling owls on 22 lines in managed versus protected forests. Here, we recorded the acoustic communication of owls. The composition of the owl community did not differ between areas. However, we found the impact of forest landscape integrity index and altitude on the diversity of owls. Forests in protected areas probably need time to develop natural and heterogeneous habitat structures. The conservation priority should be to increase the integrity of the forests. Our results also confirmed that managed forests can have a high diversity of owls.

Owls’ responses to forest conservation in the Alps

Raptor Journal

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

{"article-title":"Owls\u2019 responses to forest conservation in the Alps"}

As inhabitants of cavities, some owl species benefit from natural processes, different tree compositions and higher volumes of dead wood. We assumed that...

Owls’ responses to forest conservation in the Alps

Publié en ligne: 17 août 2023

Pages: 49 - 56

Reçu: 14 mai 2023

Accepté: 30 juil. 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/srj-2023-0006

Mots clés
forest management, landscape integrity, owl community, protected areas, biological conservation, ecology, bioacoustics

© 2023 Vladimír Nemček et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Owls’ responses to forest conservation in the Alps

Publié en ligne: 17 août 2023

Pages: 49 - 56

Reçu: 14 mai 2023

Accepté: 30 juil. 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/srj-2023-0006

Mots clésforest management, landscape integrity, owl community, protected areas, biological conservation, ecology, bioacoustics

© 2023 Vladimír Nemček et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Mots clés
forest management, landscape integrity, owl community, protected areas, biological conservation, ecology, bioacoustics