[
Abraham, W. C. & Bear, M. F. (1996). Metaplasticity: The plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends in Neuroscience, 19, 126–130.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Artiga, M. (2021). Biological functions and natural selection: a reappraisal. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(2), 1–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beavers, J. (2013). Aspectual classes and scales of change. Linguistics, 51(4), 681–706.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernecker, S. (2010). Memory: A philosophical study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Birch, J. (2016). Natural selection and the maximization of fitness. Biological Reviews, 91, 712–727.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourrat, P. (2021). Function, persistence, and selection: Generalizing the selected-effect account of function adequately. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 90, 61–67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourrat, P. (2022). Unifying heritability in evolutionary theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 91, 201–210.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corning, P. A. (2019). Teleonomy and the proximate-ultimate distinction revisited. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 127(4), 912–916.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cummins, R. (1975). Functional Analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(20), 741–765.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cummins, R. (2002). Neo-teleology. In A. Ariew, R. Cummins, and M. Perlman (Eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Biology and Psychology (pp. 157–172). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cummins, R. and Roth, M. (2010). Traits Have Not Evolved to Function the Way They Do Because of a Past Advantage. In F. J. Ayala, and R. Arp (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology (pp. 72–85). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Desmond, H. (2021). The selectionist rationale for evolutionary progress. Biology & Philosophy, 36(32).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dussault, A. (2022). Two notions of ecological function. Philosophy of Science, 89(1), 171–179. doi:10.1017/psa.2021.20
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fagerberg, H. (2022). Against the generalised theory of function. Biology & Philosophy, 37(4), 1–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garson, J. (2008). Function and Teleology. In Anya Plutynski & Sahotra Sarkar (Eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology (pp. 525–549). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garson, J. (2013). The functional sense of mechanism. Philosophy of science, 80(3), 317–333.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garson, J. (2016). A critical overview of biological functions. Cham: Springer. Garson, J. (2017). A generalized selected effects theory of function. Philosophy of Science, 84(3), 532–543.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garson, J. (2018). How to be a function pluralist. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(4), 1101–1122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garson, J. (2019). What are biological functions and why they matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garson, J. (2022). Do transposable elements have functions of their very own?. Biology & Philosophy, 37(3), 1–18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gauker, C. (1987). Conditionals in context. Erkenntnis, 27, 293–321.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ginnobili, S. (2022). Darwinian functional biology. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 37(2), 233–255.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godfrey-Smith P. (1993). Functions: consensus without unity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 74, 196–208.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godfrey-Smith P. (1994). A modern history theory of functions. Noûs, 28(3), 344–362.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Godfrey-Smith P. (2010). Causal pluralism. In H. Beebee, C. Hitchcock, and P. Menzies (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Causation (pp. 326–337). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, F. (1979). On assertion and indicative conditionals. The Philosophical Review, 88(4), 565–589.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, J. (1971). Causes and events: Mackie on causation. The Journal of Philosophy, 68(14), 426–441.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, D. (1974). Causation. The journal of philosophy, 70(17), 556–567.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Linquist, S. (2022). Causal-role myopia and the functional investigation of junk DNA. Biology & Philosophy, 37(4), 1–23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lu, Q., & Bourrat, P. (2022). On the causal interpretation of heritability from a structural causal modeling perspective. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 94, 87–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mackie, J. L., (1965). Causes and conditions. American Philosophical Quarterly, 12, 245–265.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margulis, L. (1971). Symbiosis and evolution. Scientific American, 225(2), 48–61. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24922800
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matthewson, J. (2020). Does proper function come in degrees?. Biology & Philosophy, 35(4), 1–18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millikan, R.G. (1984) Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millikan, R.G. (1989a). An ambiguity in the notion “function.” Biology and Philosophy, 4, 172–176.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millikan, R.G. (1989b). In defense of proper functions. Philosophy of Science, 56(2), 288–302.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neander, K. (1988). What does natural selection explain? Correction to Sober. Philosophy of Science, 55(3), 422–426.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neander, K. (1991a). The teleological notion of ‘function.’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 69(4), 454–468.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neander, K. (1991b). Functions as selected effects: The Conceptual Analyst’s Defense. Philosophy of Science, 58(2), 168–184.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neander, K. (1995). Misrepresenting and malfunctioning. Philosophical Studies, 79, 109–141.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neander, K. (2002). Types of traits: the importance of functional homologues. In A. Ariew, R. Cummins, and M. Perlman (Eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology (pp. 390–415). New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neander, K. (2006). Moths and metaphors. Review essay on organisms and artifacts: design in nature and elsewhere by Tim Lewens. Biology and Philosophy, 21, 591–602.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neander, K. (2009). Functional explanations. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 134(1), 5–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neander, K. (2017a). Functional analysis and the species design. Synthese 194(4): 1147–1168.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neander, K. (2017b). Response functions. In A Mark of the Mental: In Defense of Informational Teleosemantics (pp. 125–147). Cambridge: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neander, K. & Menzies, P. (1990). David Owens on Levels of Explanation. Mind, 99(395), 549–466.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papineau, D. (1985). Causal asymmetry. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 36(3), 273–289.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Poddiakov, A., & Valsiner, J. (2013). Intransitivity cycles and their transformations: How dynamically adapting systems function. In L. Rudolph (Ed.), Qualitative mathematics for the social sciences: Mathematical models for research on social dynamics (pp. 343–391). New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Povich, M., & Craver, C. F. (2017). Mechanistic levels, reduction, and emergence. In S. Glennan and P. Illari (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of mechanisms and mechanical philosophy (pp. 185–197). Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ratti, E., & Germain, P. L. (2022). A relic of design: against proper functions in biology. Biology & Philosophy, 37(27).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ross, L. N. (2021). Causal concepts in biology: How pathways differ from mechanisms and why it matters. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 72(1), 131–158.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenberg, A., & Neander, K. (2009). Are homologies (selected effect or causal role) function free?. Philosophy of Science, 76(3), 307–334.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trabasso, T., Van den Broek, P., & Suh, S. Y. (1989). Logical necessity and transitivity of causal relations in stories. Discourse processes, 12(1), 1–25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Veigl, S. J., Suárez, J., & Stencel, A. (2022). Rethinking hereditary relations: the reconstitutor as the evolutionary unit of heredity. Synthese, 200(367).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
West, S. A., & Gardner, A. (2013). Adaptation and inclusive fitness. Current Biology, 23(13), R577–R584.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wouters, A. G. (2003). Four notions of biological function. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 34, 633–668.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wright, L. (1973). Functions. The Philosophical Review, 82(2), 139–168.
]Search in Google Scholar
