Cognitive Artifacts and Their Virtues in Scientific Practice

Afeltowicz, Ł. and Wachowski, W. (2015). “How far we can go without looking under the skin: The bounds of cognitive science”. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 40(1), 91–109. doi: 10.1515/slgr-2015-0005 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Becvar, A., Hollan, J. and Hutchins, E. (2008). “Representational gestures as cognitive artifacts for developing theories in a scientific laboratory”. In: Ackerman, M.S., Halverson, C.A., Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W.A. (eds.), Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts: Theory in CSCW. London: Springer, 117–143. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84628-901-9_5 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brey, P. A. E. (2005). “The epistemology and ontology of human-computer interaction”. Minds and Machines, 15(3), 383–398. doi: 10.1007/s11023-005-9003-1 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brown, G., Wyatt, J., Harris, R. and Yao, X. (2005). “Diversity creation methods: A survey and categorisation”. Information Fusion, 6(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.004 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. (1959). “Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix”. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2016). Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190217013.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. J. (1998). “The extended mind”. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.10.1093/analys/58.1.7 Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (1991). “Epistemology externalized”. Dialectica, 45(2–3), 191–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1991.tb00986.x Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Facchin, M. (2021). “Structural representations do not meet the job description challenge”. Synthese. doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03032-8 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fasoli, M. (2018). “Substitutive, complementary and constitutive cognitive artifacts: Developing an interaction-centered approach”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(3), 671–687. doi: 10.1007/s13164-017-0363-2 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fodor, J. A. (1991). “The dogma that didn’t bark (A fragment of a naturalized epistemology)”. Mind, 100(2), 201–220. doi: 10.1093/mind/LI.202.200 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

French, S. (2020). There Are No Such Things As Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198848158.001.0001 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Frixione, M. (2001). “Tractable competence”. Minds and Machines, 379–397.10.1023/A:1017503201702 Search in Google Scholar

Gablasova, D., Brezina, V. and McEnery, T. (2017). “Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence”. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179. doi: 10.1111/lang.12225 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gitelman, L. (ed.). (2013). “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9302.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Gładziejewski, P. (2016). “Predictive coding and representationalism”. Synthese, 193(2), 559–582. doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-0762-9 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Haugeland, J. (1998). Having Thought. Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge Mass./London: Harvard University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Heersmink, R. (2013). “A taxonomy of cognitive artifacts: function, information, and categories. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, (4), 465–481. doi: 10.1007/s13164-013-0148-1 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Heersmink, R. (2021). “Varieties of artifacts: embodied, perceptual, cognitive, and affective”. Topics in Cognitive Science, 13(4), 573–596. doi: 10.1111/tops.12 549 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hellman, M. (1980). “A cryptanalytic time-memory trade-off”. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 26(4), 401–406. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1980.1056220 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hochstein, E. (2016). “One mechanism, many models: A distributed theory of mechanistic explanation”. Synthese, 193(5), 1387–1407. doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-0844-8 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hohol, M. (2020). Foundations of Geometric Cognition. New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Hohol, M. and Miłkowski, M. (2019). “Cognitive artifacts for geometric reasoning”. Foundations of Science, 24(4), 657–680. doi: 10.1007/s10699-019-09603-w Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). “Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Jurgens, D., Kumar, S., Hoover, R., McFarland, D. and Jurafsky, D. (2018). “Measuring the evolution of a scientific field through citation frames”. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 391–406. doi: 10.1162/tacl a 00028 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Keas, M. N. (2018). “Systematizing the theoretical virtues”. Synthese, 195(6), 2761–2793. doi: 10.1007/s11229-017-1355-6 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychly, P. and Suchomel, V. (2014). “The Sketch Engine: Ten years on”. Lexicography, 1, 7–36. doi: 10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Larkin, J. and Simon, H. A. (1987). “Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words”. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80026-5 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and Its Problem: Towards a Theory of ScientificGrowth. Berkeley Ca.: University of California Press. Search in Google Scholar

Lean, O. M., Rivelli, L. and Pence, C. H. (2021, accepted). “Digital literature analysis for empirical philosophy of science”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. doi: 10.1086/715049 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Litwin, P. and Miłkowski, M. (2020). “Unification by fiat: arrested development of predictive processing”. Cognitive Science, 44(7), e12867. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12867 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Marghetis, T. and Núñez, R. (2013). “The motion behind the symbols: a vital role for dynamism in the conceptualization of limits and continuity in expert mathematics”. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(2), 299–316. doi: 10.1111/tops.12013 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Medawar, P. (1963). “Is scientific paper a fraud?” The Listener, 70, 377–378. Search in Google Scholar

Miłkowski, M. (2010). “Making naturalised epistemology (slightly) normative”. In: Miłkowski, M. and Talmont-Kamiński, K. (eds.), Beyond Description: Naturalism and Normativity. London: College Publications, 72–84. Search in Google Scholar

Miłkowski, M., Clowes, R. W., Rucińska, Z., Przegalińska, A., Zawidzki, T., Gies, A., ... Hohol, M. (2018). “From wide cognition to mechanisms: a silent revolution”. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02393 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Miłkowski, M., Hensel, W. M., and Hohol, M. (2018). “Replicability or reproducibility? On the replication crisis in computational neuroscience and sharing only relevant detail”. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 45(3), 163–172. doi: 10.1007/s10827-018-0702-z Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mizrahi, M. (2021, accepted). “Theoretical virtues in scientific practice: an empirical study”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. doi: 10.1086/714790 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Moretti, F. (2000). “Conjectures on World Literature”. New Left Review, 1, 54–68. Search in Google Scholar

Morgan, A. (2013). “Representations gone mental”. Synthese, 191(2), 213–244. doi: 10.1007/s11229-013-0328-7 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nersessian, N. J. (2006). “The cognitive-cultural systems of the research laboratory”. Organization Studies, 27(1), 125–145. doi: 10.1177/0170840606061842 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Netz, R. (2011). The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Nirshberg, G. and Shapiro, L. (2021). “Structural and indicator representations: A difference in degree, not kind”. Synthese, 198, 7647–7664. doi: 10.1007/s11229-020-02537-y Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. (1991). “Cognitive artifacts”. In: Carroll, J. M. (ed.), Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17–38. Search in Google Scholar

Norman, D. A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. Search in Google Scholar

Pence, C. H., and Ramsey, G. (2018). “How to do digital philosophy of science”. Philosophy of Science, 85(5), 930–941. doi: 10.1086/699697 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Pessoa, L., Medina, L. and Desfilis, E. (2022). “Refocusing neuroscience: Moving away from mental categories and towards complex behaviours”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1844), 20200534. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0534 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Piccinini, G. and Anderson, N. G. (2018). “Ontic pancomputationalism”. In: Cuffaro, M.E and Fletcher, S.C. (eds.), Physical Perspectives on Computation, Computational Perspectives on Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–38. doi: 10.1017/9781316759745.002 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Piper, A. (2020). Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108922036 Search in Google Scholar

Pitcher, D. and Ungerleider, L. G. (2021). “Evidence for a third visual pathway specialized for social perception”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(2), 100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.006 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Poldrack, R. A., Kittur, A., Kalar, D., Miller, E., Seppa, C., Gil, Y., ... Bilder, R. M. (2011). “The cognitive atlas: toward a knowledge foundation for cognitive neuroscience”. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 5. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00017 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Regt, H. W. de. (2017). Understanding Scientific Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190652913.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Rupert, R. D. (2013). “Distributed cognition and extended-mind theory”. In: Kaldis, B. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. Search in Google Scholar

Rychlý, P. (2008). “A lexicographer-friendly association score”. Proceedings of Second Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Languages Processing, 6–9. Brno: Masaryk University. Search in Google Scholar

Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498350 Search in Google Scholar

Soo Ko, B. (2019). ImageNet Classification Leaderboard. Retrieved March 13, 2022, from Computer-Vision-Leaderboard website: https://kobiso.github.io/Computer-Vision-Leaderboard/imagenet.html Search in Google Scholar

Stenning, K. and Lambalgen, M. V. (2008). Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7964.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Tan, M. and Le, Q. V. (2020). “EfficientNet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks”. ArXiv:1905.11946 [Cs, Stat]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11946 Search in Google Scholar

Vaccari, A. P. (2017). “Against cognitive artifacts: Extended cognition and the problem of defining ‘artifact’”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 879–892. doi: 10.1007/s11097-016-9484-9 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Van Rooij, I. (2008). “The tractable cognition thesis”. Cognitive Science, 32(6), 939–984. doi: 10.1080/03640210801897856 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wachowski, W. M. (2018). “Commentary: distributed cognition and distributed morality: agency, artifacts and systems”. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi: 10/gdcbs5 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1pncnrh Search in Google Scholar

Wray, A. (2012). “What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 231–254. doi: 10.1017/S026719051200013X Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zhang, J. (1997). “The nature of external representations in problem solving”. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179–217. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80022-6 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zhang, J. and Norman, D. A. (1994). “Representations in distributed cognitive tasks”. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 87–122. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1801_3 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar