1. bookVolume 61 (2020): Edition 1 (March 2020)
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2199-6059
ISSN
0860-150X
Première parution
08 Aug 2013
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Accès libre

Normative Generics and Norm Breaching – A Questionnaire-Based Study of Parent-Child Interactions in English

Publié en ligne: 20 Mar 2020
Volume & Edition: Volume 61 (2020) - Edition 1 (March 2020)
Pages: 49 - 68
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
2199-6059
ISSN
0860-150X
Première parution
08 Aug 2013
Périodicité
4 fois par an
Langues
Anglais

Andres, L. (2012). Designing and doing survey research. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781526402202Search in Google Scholar

Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051161603710.1017/CBO9780511616037Search in Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and its uses. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503623125Search in Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/978131577535710.4324/9781315775357Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, G., Eriksson, L., Goodin, R. E., & Southwood, N. (2013). Explaining norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Brożek, B. (2012). Normatywność prawa. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska.Search in Google Scholar

Carlson, G. N., & Pelletier, F. J. (Eds.). (1995). The generic book. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, A. (1999). Think generic: The meaning and use of generic sentences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, A. (2001). On the generic use of indefinite singulars. Journal of Semantics, 18(1), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/18.3.18310.1093/jos/18.3.183Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, R., Karl, J. A., & Fischer, M. V. (2019). Norms across cultures: A cross-cultural meta-analysis of norms effects in the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(10), 1112–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202211984640910.1177/0022022119846409Search in Google Scholar

Fitch, K. L., & Sanders, R. E. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Geary, D. C. (2010). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12072-00010.1037/12072-000Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, S. A. (2010). Generics as a window onto young children’s concepts. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Kinds, things, and stuff: The cognitive side of generics and mass terms (pp. 100–122). New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ghazizadeh, A., Griggs, W., & Hikosaka, O. (2016). Ecological origins of object salience: Reward, uncertainty, aversiveness, and novelty. Frontiers in Neuro-science, 10, 378.10.3389/fnins.2016.00378Search in Google Scholar

Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Glüer, K., & Wikforss, Å. (2018). The normativity of meaning and content. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/meaning-normativity/.Search in Google Scholar

Hesni, S. (2019). Normative discourse and social negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://doi.org/10.1134/S106378341410032110.1134/S1063783414100321Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/373839310.2307/3738393Search in Google Scholar

Itkonen, E. (2008). The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In J. Zlatev, T.P. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 279–305). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.16itk10.1075/celcr.12.16itkSearch in Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Knobe, J., Prasada, S., & Newman, G. E. (2013). Dual character concepts and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognition, 127(2), 242–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.00510.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005Search in Google Scholar

Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). The sources of normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo978051155447610.1017/CBO9780511554476Search in Google Scholar

Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., terMeulen, A., Link, G., & Chierchia, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1–124). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. (1997). Generics and habituals. In A. Athanasiadou & R. Dirven (Eds.), On conditionals again (pp. 191–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. (1999). Generic constructions. In Grammar and conceptualization (pp. 247–260). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D. (2019). Genericity. In C. Cummins & N. Katsos (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of experimental semantics and pragmatics (pp. 156–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.1210.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, S.-J. (2007). Generics and the structure of the mind. Philosophical perspectives, 21(1), 375–403.10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00138.xSearch in Google Scholar

Leslie, S.-J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. Philosophical Review, 117(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-02310.1215/00318108-2007-023Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, S.-J. (2012). Generics articulate default generalizations. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes, 41, 25–44. https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.204810.4000/rlv.2048Search in Google Scholar

Leslie, S.-J. (2015). “Hillary Clinton is the only man in the Obama administration”: Dual character concepts, generics, and gender. Analytic Philosophy, 56(2), 111–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.1206310.1111/phib.12063Search in Google Scholar

Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978110733881410.1017/CBO9781107338814Search in Google Scholar

Mäkilähde, A., Leppänen, V., & Itkonen, E. (Eds.). (2019). Norms and normativity in language and linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.01mak10.1075/slcs.209.01makSearch in Google Scholar

McConnell-Ginet, S. (2012). Generic predicates and interest-relativity. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 57(2), 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1353/cjl.2012.002810.1353/cjl.2012.0028Search in Google Scholar

Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (2009). Food taboos: Their origins and purposes. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 5, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-5-1810.1186/1746-4269-5-18Search in Google Scholar

Nickel, B. (2008). Generics and the ways of normality. Linguistics and Philosophy, 31(6), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9049-710.1007/s10988-008-9049-7Search in Google Scholar

Nickel, B. (2016). Between logic and the world: An integrated theory of generics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640003.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Nuyts, J., Byloo, P., & Diepeveen, J. (2010). On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: The case of Dutch mogen and moeten. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(1), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.01210.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, E. (2017). Kinds of norms. Philosophy compass, 12(5), e12416. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.1241610.1111/phc3.12416Search in Google Scholar

Paulus, M., & Schmidt, M. F. H. (2018). The early development of the normative mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 165, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.01110.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.011Search in Google Scholar

Pelletier, F. J., & Asher, N. (1997). Generics and defaults. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of logic and language (pp. 1125–1179). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebdSearch in Google Scholar

Pilcher, J. M. (Ed.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of food history. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2016.114372010.1080/15528014.2016.1143720Search in Google Scholar

Radden, G. (2009). Generic reference in English. A metonymic and conceptual blending theory. In K.-U. Panther, L. T. Thornburg & A. Barcelona (Eds.), Metonymy and metaphor in grammar (pp. 199–228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, H.-J., & Günther, F. (2016). Toward a unified socio-cognitive framework for salience in language. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1110.10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. F. H., & Rakoczy, H. (2018). Developing an understanding of normativity. In A. Newen, L. De Bruin & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognition: Embodied, embedded, enactive and extended (pp. 685–706). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.3610.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.36Search in Google Scholar

Shackelford, T. K., & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of evolutionary perspectives on violence, homicide, and war. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.001.000110.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sidnell, J. (Ed.). (2010). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051163567010.1017/CBO9780511635670Search in Google Scholar

Star, D. (Ed.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of reasons and normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.001.000110.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Turiel, E. (2008). Thought about actions in social domains: Morality, social conventions, and social interactions. Cognitive Development, 23(1), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.04.00110.1016/j.cogdev.2007.04.001Search in Google Scholar

Wedgwood, R. (2018). The unity of normativity. In D. Star (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of reasons and normativity (pp. 23–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.210.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.2Search in Google Scholar

Young, P. (2003). The power of norms. In P. Hammerstein (Ed.), Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation (pp. 389–399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo