[
Abbott, Kenneth W., Genschel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan et al. (éds.). 2015. International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139979696
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Avril, Christelle, Cartier, Marie et Delphine Serre. 2010. Enquêter sur le travail. Concepts, méthodes, ré cits.Paris : La Découverte.10.3917/dec.avril.2010.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Badache, Fanny et Leah Kimber. 2023. Anchoring International Organizations in Organizational Sociology. Swiss Journal of Sociology 49(1): 9–19.10.2478/sjs-2023-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnett, Michael et Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World. International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bezès, Philippe. 2007. Construire des bureaucraties wébériennes à l’ère du New Public Management ? Critique internationale 2(35) : 9–29.10.3917/crii.035.0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bezès, Philippe et Patrick Le Lidec. 2016. Politiques de l’organisation. Les nouvelles divisions du travail étatique. Revue française de science politique 66(3): 407–433.10.3917/rfsp.663.0407
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bidet, Alexandra (dir.). 2006. Sociologie du travail et activité. Le travail en actes, nouveaux regards. Toulouse : Octarès Editions.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buchet de Neuilly, Yves. 2019. Les frontières des Organisations Internationales. Autonomie et dépen-dances des engagements de sécurité collective. Pp. 25–42 in Penser les frontières sociales. Enquêtes sur la culture, l’engagement et la politique, dirigé par Lilian Mathieu et Violaine Roussel. Lyon : Presses universitaires de Lyon.10.4000/books.pul.28656
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiapello, Eve. 2017. La financiarisation des politiques publiques. Mondes en développement 178(2): 23–40.10.3917/med.178.0023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christian, Ben. 2023. Working for World Peace: Between Idealism and Cynicism. Swiss Journal of Sociology 49(1): 21–40.10.2478/sjs-2023-0003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Common, Richard K. 1998. Convergence and Transfer: A Review of the Globalisation of New Public Management. International Journal of Public Sector Management 11(6): 440–450.10.1108/09513559810244356
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crozier, Michel et Erhard Friedberg. 1977. L’Acteur et le système. Paris : Editions du Seuil.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dairon, Emilie. 2023. La compétence bureaucratique: une source de pouvoir ? Une exploration du personnel des Organisations Internationales à travers la notion de compétence dans la sociologie des organisations. Swiss Journal of Sociology 49(1): 83–102.10.2478/sjs-2023-0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Devin, Guillaume. 2022. Les Organisations internationales. Entre intégration et différenciation. Paris : Armand Colin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duncan, Jessica. 2015. Global Food Security Governance: Civil Society Participation in Committee on World Food Security. London: EarthScan Routledge.10.4324/9781315754130
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ermand, Eva et Anders Uhlin (eds.). 2010. Legitimacy Beyond the State? Re-Examining the Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.10.1057/9780230283251_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FAO. 2000. Principles and Guidelines for FAO Cooperation With the Private Sector. Rome: FAO.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FAO. 2013. Strategy for Partnership with the Private Sector. Rome: FAO.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fresia, Marion. 2009. Une élite transnationale : la fabrique d’une identité professionnelle chez les fonctionnaires du Haut-Commissariat des Nations Unies aux Refugiés. Revue européenne des migrations internationales 25(3) : 167–190.10.4000/remi.4999
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Geri, Laurence R. 2001. New Public Management and the Reform of International Organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences 67(3): 446–460.10.1177/0020852301673004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6): 781–795.10.2307/2095325
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Graz, Jean-Christophe. 2006. Les hybrides de la mondialisation. Acteurs, objets et espaces de l’économie politique internationale. Revue française de science politique 56(5) : 765–787.10.3917/rfsp.565.0765
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guilbaud, Auriane. 2015. Business Partners. Firmes privées et gouvernance mondiale de la santé. Paris : Presses de Sciences Po.10.3917/scpo.guilb.2015.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guston, David H. 2001. Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values 26(4) : 399–408.10.1177/016224390102600401
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, David L. et Michael J. Tiernay (dir). 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hibou, Béatrice. 2012. La Bureaucratisation du monde à l’ère néolibérale. Paris : La Découverte.10.3917/dec.hibou.2013.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holzscheiter, Anna. 2017. Coping with Institutional Fragmentation? Competition and Convergence between Boundary Organizations in the Global Response to Polio. Review of Policy Research 34: 767–789.10.1111/ropr.12256
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kell, Georg et John G. Ruggie. 1999. Global Markets and Social Legitimacy: The Case for the Global Compact. Transnational Corporations 8(3): 101–220.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kimber, Leah. 2023. Civil society at the United Nations through the lens of organizational sociology: Exclusion and Temporariness. Swiss Journal of Sociology 49(1): 9–20.10.2478/sjs-2023-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lamont, Michèle et Virág Molnár. 2002. The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28: 167–195.10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martens, Jens et Karolin Seitz. 2019. Rules of Engagement Between the UN and Private Actors. Aachen/Berlin/Bonn: Working Paper.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mathieu, Lilian et Violaine Roussel (dir.). 2019. Penser les frontières sociales. Enquêtes sur la culture, l’engagement et la politique. Lyon: Presses universitaires de Lyon.10.4000/books.pul.28586
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McKeon, Nora. 2009. The United Nations and Civil Society. Legitimating Global Governance – Whose Voice? London: Zed Books.10.5040/9781350223592
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meuleman, Louis. 2008. Public Management and the Metagovernance of Hierarchies, Networks and Markets. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miller, Clark. 2001. Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime. Science, Technology and Human Values 26(4): 478–500.10.1177/016224390102600405
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nay, Olivier. 2021. L’ouverture des organisations internationales. Trois interprétations sociologiques. Pp. 37–54 in Le tournant social de l’international dirigé par Delphine Lagrange, Marieke Louis et Olivier Nay. Rennes : Presses Universitaires de Rennes.10.4000/books.pur.144795
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Orsini, Amandine, Louafi, Sélim et Jean-Frédéric Morin. 2017. Boundary Concepts for Boundary Work Between Science and Technology Studies and International Relations: Special Issue Introduction. Review of Policy Research 34: 734–743.10.1111/ropr.12273
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pouliot, Vincent. 2017. L’ordre hiérarchique international. Les luttes de rang dans la diplomatie multilatérale. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.10.3917/scpo.pouli.2017.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Santos, Filipe M et Kathleen M. Eisenhardt. 2005. Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization. Organization Science 16(5) : 491–508.10.1287/orsc.1050.0152
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics. American Political Science Review 64(4): 1033–1053.10.2307/1958356
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott, W. Richard. 1994. Conceptualizing Organizational Fields. Pp. 203–221 in System Rationality and Partial Interests, edited by Hans-Ulrich Derlien, Uta Gerhardt and Fritz W. Scharpf. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Star, Susan Leigh et James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420.10.1177/030631289019003001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, Squatrilo, Theresa et Christer Jönsson. 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107325135
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trondal, Jarle, Marcussen, Martin, Larsson, Torbjörn et Frode Veggeland. 2010. Unpacking International Organisations: The Dynamics of Compound Bureaucracies. Manchester. Manchester University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UN JIU (Joint Inspection Unit) et Petru Dumitriu. 2017. The United Nations System: Private Sector Partnerships Arrangements in the Context of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Geneva: JUI/REP/2017/8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WHO Secretariat. 2015 (14 octobre). Implication of Implementing the Framework of engagement with non-State actors. Non-paper [http://www.who.int/about/collaborations/non-state-actors/Implication-implementing-Framework.pdf?ua=1 (consulté le 11/06/2021)].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WHO Secretariat. 2016 (24 avril). Cost Implication for WHO of the Implementation of FENSA. https://www.who.int/about/collaborations/non-state-actors/Additional-information-FENSA-24April2016.pdf (28.02.2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zietsma, Charlene et Thomas B. Lawrence. 2010. Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work. Administrative Science Quarterly 55: 189–221.10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189
]Search in Google Scholar
