[
Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. 2011. International Practices. International Theory 3(1): 1–36.10.1017/S175297191000031X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, and Vincent Pouliot. 2014. Power in Practice: Negotiating the International Intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 889–911.10.1177/1354066113512702
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Agné, Hans, Lisa Marie Dellmuth, and Jonas Tallberg. 2015. Does Stakeholder Involvement Foster Democratic Legitimacy in International Organizations? An Empirical Assessment of a Normative Theory. The Review of International Organizations 10(4): 465–488.10.1007/s11558-014-9212-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Albaret, Mélanie, and Joan Deas. 2023. Semi-Structured Interviews. Pp. xx in International Organizations and Research Methods: An Introduction edited by Fanny Badache, Leah R. Kimber, and Lucile Maertens. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amenta, Edwin, Neal Caren, Elizabeth Chiarello, and Yang Su. 2010. The Political Consequences of Social Movements. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 287–307.10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderl, Felix, Priska Daphi, and Nicole Deitelhoff. 2021. Keeping Your Enemies Close? The Variety of Social Movements’ Reactions to International Organizations’ Opening Up. International Studies Review 23(4): 1273–1299.10.1093/isr/viaa103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Andrews, Kenneth T., and Bob Edwards. 2004. Advocacy Organizations in the US Political Process. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 479–506.10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110542
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anheier, Helmut K. 2018. The United Nations and Civil Society in Times of Change: Four Propositions. Global Policy 9(3): 291–300.10.1111/1758-5899.12555
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Archer, Clive. 2014. International Organizations. Routledge.10.4324/9781315751511
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnstein, Sherry R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of planners 35(4) : 216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Autesserre, Séverine. 2014. Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107280366
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Badache, Fanny, and Leah R. Kimber. 2023. Anchoring International Organizations in Organizational Sociology. Swiss Review of Sociology 49(1): 9–19.10.2478/sjs-2023-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Badache, Fanny, Leah R. Kimber, Lucile Maertens. 2023. International Organizations and Research Methods: An Introduction. Ann Harbor: The University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.11685289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bakker, Arnold B. 2010. Engagement and “Job Crafting”: Engaged Employees Create their Own Great Place to Work. Pp. 229–244 in Handbook of Employee Engagement: Perspectives, Issues, research and practice, edited by Simon L. Albrecht. Northampton, MA: Edwin Elgar.10.4337/9781849806374.00027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bakker, René M., Bart Cambré, and Keith G. Provan. 2009. The resource dilemma of temporary organizations: A dynamic perspective on temporal embeddedness and resource discretion. Pp. 201–220 in Temporary Organizations, edited by Patrick Kenis, Martyna Janowicz-Panjaitan, and Bart Cambré. Northhampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781849802154.00017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bakker, Rene M., Robert J. DeFillippi, Andreas Schwab, and Jörg Sydow. 2016. Temporary Organizing: Promises, Processes, Problems. Organization Studies 37(12): 1703–1719.10.1177/0170840616655982
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bechky, Beth A. 2006. Gaffers, Gofers, and Grips: Role-based Coordination in Temporary Organizations. Orga nizationScience 17(1): 3–21.10.1287/orsc.1050.0149
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Betsill, Michele, and Elisabeth Corell. 2008. NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations. MA MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7512.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bexell, Magdalena, Jonas Tallberg, and Anders Uhlin. 2010. Democracy in Global Governance: The Promises and Pitfalls of Transnational Actors. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 16(1): 81–101.10.1163/19426720-01601006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruneau, Quentin. 2022. Converging Paths: Bounded Rationality, Practice Theory and the Study of Change in Historical International Relations. International Theory 14(1): 88–114.10.1017/S1752971920000494
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bueger, Christian, and Frank Gadinger. 2018. International Practice Theory. 2nd ed. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-73350-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burke, Catriona M., and Michael J. Morley. 2016. On Temporary Organizations: A Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda. Human Relations 69(6): 1235–1258.10.1177/0018726715610809
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carayannis, Tatiana, and Thomas G. Weiss. 2021. The “Third” United Nations: How Knowledge-Brokers Help the UN Think. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198855859.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Charnovitz, Steve. 1996. Two Centuries of Participation: Ngos and International Governance. Michigan Journal of International Law 18: 183–261.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clifford, James. 1983. On ethnographic authority. Representations 2: 118–146.10.2307/2928386
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, Samy. 2004. Le pouvoir des ONG en question. Le Débat 128(1): 57–76.10.3917/deba.128.0057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornut, Jeremie, and Nicolas De Zamaróczy, 2021. How Can Documents Speak About Practices? Practice Tracing, the Wikileaks Cables, and Diplomatic Culture. Cooperation and Conflict 56(3): 328–345.10.1177/0010836720972426
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 2018 (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 1989: Iss. 1, Article 8.10.4324/9780429500480-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crozier, Michel, and Erhard Friedberg. 1980. Actors and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dairon, Emilie, and Fanny Badache. 2021. Understanding International Organizations’ Headquarters as Ecosystems: The Case of Geneva. Global Policy 12(S7): 2–33.10.1111/1758-5899.12956
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dellmuth, Lisa Marie. And Jonas Tallberg. 2017. Advocacy Strategies in Global Governance: Inside versus Outside Lobbying. Political Studies 65(3): 705–723.10.1177/0032321716684356
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dellmuth, L. M. (2020). Interest Groups and the United Nations (UN). In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_60-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dellmuth, Lisa Marie. 2020. Interest Groups and the United Nations in The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs, edited by Phil Harris, Alberto Bitonti, Craig S. Fleisher, and Anne Skorkjær Binderkrantz. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_60-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dingwerth, Klaus, Henning Schmidtke, and Tobias Weise. 2020. The Rise of Democratic Legitimation: Why International Organizations Speak the Language of Democracy. European Journal of International Relations 26(3): 714–741.10.1177/1354066119882488
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dörfler, Thomas, and Mirko Heinzel. 2022. Greening Global Governance: INGO Secretariats and Environmental Mainstreaming of IOs, 1950 to 2017. The Review of International Organizations, volume 18, 1–27.10.1007/s11558-022-09462-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lotte Drieghe, Jan Orbie, Diana Potjomkina & Jamal Shahin (2022) Participation of Civil Society in EU Trade Policy Making: How Inclusive is Inclusion? New Political Economy, 27:4, 581–596, DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2021.1879763.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Dür, Andreas, and Dirk De Bièvre. 2007. Inclusion Without Influence? NGOs in European Trade Policy. Journal of Public Policy 27(1): 79–101.10.1017/S0143814X0700061X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodman, Richard Alan, and Lawrence Peter Goodman. 1976. Some Management Issues in Temporary Systems: A Study of Professional Development and Manpower. The Theater Case. Administrative Science Quarterly, 494–501.10.2307/2391857
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gordenker, Leon, and Thomas G. Weiss. 1997. Devolving Responsibilities: A Framework for Analysing Ngos and Services. Third World Quarterly 18(3): 443–456.10.1080/01436599714803
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guilbaud, Auriane. 2023. Le travail des frontières sociales au sein des organisations internationales : taxonomie et résistances. Swiss Review of Sociology 49(1): 103–121.10.2478/sjs-2023-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanegraaff, Marcel. 2015a. Interest Groups at Transnational Negotiation Conferences: Goals, Strategies, Interactions, and Influence. Global Governance 21(4): 599–620.10.1163/19426720-02104007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanegraaff, Marcel. 2015b. Transnational Advocacy over Time: Business and NGO Mobilization at UN Climate Summits. Global Environmental Politics 15(1): 83–104.10.1162/GLEP_a_00273
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hanegraaff, Marcel, Jens van der Ploeg, and Joost Berkhout. 2020. Exploring the Proportionality of Representation in Interest Group Mobilization and Political Access: The Case of the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 1–23.10.1057/s41269-020-00185-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hasenclever, Andreas, and Henrike Narr. 2018. The dark side of the affectedness-paradigm: lessons from the Indigenous peoples’ movement at the United Nations. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 3(5–6): 684–702.10.1080/23802014.2018.1553505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holthaus, Leonie. 2021. Practice Theory and the Opening Up of International Organizations. Global Studies Quarterly 1(3): 1–5.10.1093/isagsq/ksab020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keck, Margaret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1999. Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International social science journal 51(159): 89–101.10.1111/1468-2451.00179
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kimber, Leah. R. 2020. The Architecture of Exclusion at the United Nations: Analyzing the Inclusion of the Women’s Group in the Negotiations of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. PhD thesis. University of Geneva.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kimber, Leah. R., and Emilie Dairon. 2023. Ethnographic Interviews. Pp. xx in International Organizations and Research Methods: An Introduction edited by Fanny Badache, Leah R. Kimber, and Lucile Maertens. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kimber, Leah R., and Lucile Maertens. 2021. Experiencing Time and Space within the United Nations. Global Policy 12(Suppl.7): 14–23.10.1111/1758-5899.13005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kimber, Leah R., and Lucile Maertens. 2023. Participant Observation Pp. xx in International Organizations and Research Methods: An Introduction edited by Fanny Badache, Leah R. Kimber, and Lucile Maertens. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kimber, Leah R., and Jackie F. Steele. 2021. Feminist advocacy on international agreements for disaster risk reduction: From Yokohama to Sendai. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 64: 102457.10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102457
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kostova, Tatiana. 1999. Transnational Transfer of Strategic Organizational Practices: A Contextual Perspective. Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 308–324.10.2307/259084
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lagrange, Delphine, Marieke Louis, and Olivier Nay (eds.). 2021. Le tournant social de l’international: Les organisations internationales face aux sociétés civiles. Presses universitaires de Rennes.10.4000/books.pur.144740
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lanzerra, Giovan F. 1983. Ephemeral Organizations in Extreme Environments: Emergences, Strategy, Extinctions. Journal of Management Studies 20(1): 71–95.10.1111/j.1467-6486.1983.tb00199.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Littoz-Monnet, Annabelle. 2012. Agenda-Setting Dynamics at the EU Level: the Case of the EU Cultural Policy. Journal of European Integration 34(5): 505–522.10.1080/07036337.2011.638065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lucas, Kirsten, Marcel Hanegraaff, and Iskander De Bruycker. 2019. Lobbying the Lobbyists: When and Why Do Policymakers Seek to Influence Advocacy Groups in Global Governance? Interest Groups & Advocacy 8(2): 208–232.10.1057/s41309-019-00050-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lundin, Rolf A., and Anders Söderholm. 1995. A Theory of the Temporary Organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management 11(4): 437–455.10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mercer, Claire. 2002. NGOs, Civil Society and Democratization: A Critical Review of the Literature. Progress in Development Studies 2(1): 5–22.10.1191/1464993402ps027ra
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Minkoff, Debra, and John McCarthy. 2005. Reinvigorating the Study of Organizational Processes in Social Movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 10(2): 289–308.10.17813/maiq.10.2.rp8h757h42752w76
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mitrani, Mor. 2013. Global Civil Society and International Society: Compete or Complete? Alternatives, 38(2): 172–188.10.1177/0304375413486333
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nasiritousi, Naghmeh, and Björn-Ola Linnér. 2016. Open or Closed Meetings? Explaining Nonstate Actor Involvement in the International Climate Change Negotiations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 16(1): 127–144.10.1007/s10784-014-9237-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Otto, Dianne. 1996. Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Nations System: The Emerging Role of International Civil Society. Human Rights Quarterly 18:107.10.1353/hrq.1996.0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parini, Lorena. 2006. Le système de genre : Introduction aux concepts et théories. Zürich: Seismo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pouliot, Vincent. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316534564
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pouliot, Vincent, and Jean-Philippe Thérien. 2018. Global governance in practice. Global Policy 9(2): 163–172.10.1111/1758-5899.12529
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pralle, Sarah B. 2010. Shopping Around: Environmental Organizations and the Search for Policy Venues, Book section 7. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511762635.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rauch, Svenja. 2018. From the Millennium Declaration (2000) to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (2015): Tracing the Dynamics of Global Goal Setting Processes. PhD thesis, University of Geneva.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scholte, Jan A. 2004. Civil Society and Democratically Accountable Global Governance. Government and Opposition 39: 211–233.10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00121.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schwartzberg, Joseph E. 2013. Transforming the United Nations System: Designs for a Workable World. Brookings Institution Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scott, W. Richard. 2004. Reflections on a Half-Century of Organizational Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 1–21.10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110644
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sénit, Carole-Anne, and Frank Biermann. 2021. In Whose Name Are You Speaking? The Marginalization of the Poor in Global Civil Society. Global Policy 12(5): 581–591.10.1111/1758-5899.12997
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smouts, Marie-Claude. 1995. International Organizations and Inequality among States. International Social Science Journal 47(2): 229–241.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steffek, Jens, Claudia Kissling, and Patrizia Nanz (eds.). 2007. Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance: A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Springer.10.1057/9780230592506
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sydow, Jörg, and Timo Braun. 2018. Projects as Temporary Organizations: An Agenda for Further Theorizing the Interorganizational Dimension. International Journal of Project Management 36(1): 4–11.10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sydow, Jörg, and Arnold Windeler. 2020. Temporary Organizing and Permanent Contexts. Current Sociology 68(4): 480–498.10.1177/0011392120907629
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tallberg, Jonas, Thomas Sommerer, Theresa Squatrito, and Christer Jönsson. 2013. The Opening Up of In ter nationalOrganizations. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107325135
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tallberg, Jonas, Lisa M. Dellmuth, Hans Agné, and Andreas Duit. 2018. NGO influence in international organizations: Information, access and exchange. British Journal of Political Science 48(1): 213–238.10.1017/S000712341500037X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trent, John E. 2007. Modernizing the United Nations System: Civil Society’s Role in Moving from International Relations to Global Governance. Opladen and Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.10.2307/j.ctvdf066w
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weber, Max. 1968 [1922]. Economy and Society, edited by Ephraim Fischoff, Guenter Dietmar Roth, and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weick, Karl E. 1993. The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster. Administrative science quarterly 38(4): 628–652.10.2307/2393339
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weick, Karl E. 2009. Enacting an Environment: The Infrastructure of Organizing. Pp. 183–195 in Debating Organization: Point-counterpoint in Organization Studies, edited by Robert Westwood, and Stewart Clegg. London: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weiss, Thomas G. 2003. The Illusion of UN Security Council Reform. Washington Quarterly 26(4): 147–161.10.1162/016366003322387163
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weiss, Thomas G. and Ramesh Thakur. 2010. Global Governance and the UN: An Unfinished Journey. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctt16gznrf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weiss, Thomas G., Tatiana Carayannis, and Robert Jolly. 2009. The “Third” United Nations. Global Governance 15(1): 123–142.10.1163/19426720-01501008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Willetts, Peter. 2006. The Cardoso Report on the UN and Civil Society: Functionalism, Global Corporatism or Global Democracy? Global Governance 12(3): 305–324.10.1163/19426720-01203006
]Search in Google Scholar
