Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness of the Slovenian Version of the Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM-Slo) in Patients with Wrist and Hand Disorders
04 oct. 2023
À propos de cet article
Catégorie d'article: Original scientific article
Publié en ligne: 04 oct. 2023
Pages: 198 - 206
Reçu: 06 juin 2023
Accepté: 22 sept. 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0028
Mots clés
© 2023 Vida BOJNEC et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1.

Correlations of different outcome measures with PEM at baseline (T1, n=51)_
PEM (r) | ||
---|---|---|
Grip strength | 0.415 | 0.003 |
DASH | 0.757 | <0.001 |
EQ-5D-5L | 0.600 | <0.001 |
EQ-5D-5L-Mobility | 0.185 | 0.193 |
EQ-5D-5L-Self-care | 0.547 | <0.001 |
EQ-5D-5L-Usual activities | 0.505 | <0.001 |
EQ-5D-5L-Pain | 0.575 | <0.001 |
EQ-5D-5L-Anxiety/Depression | 0.417 | 0.002 |
Total scores of outcome measures at baseline (T1), second assessment (T2), and follow-up (T3) for all patients (n=51), observed change (T3)-(T1), standardised response mean (SRM) and effect size (ES)_
Outcome measure | Baseline (T1) mean (SD) (range) | Two to four days after T1 (T2) mean (SD) (range) | Follow-up (T3) mean (SD) (range) | Observed change (T3) - (T1) |
ES | SRM |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
44.1 (18.7) | 37 (17.9) | 22 (16.6) | - 21 (14.8) | 1.25 | 1.42 | |
(3.9-82.1) | (3.9-69.2) | (0-73.1) | (-3.8- -68) | |||
41.6 (23.5) | / | 23.4 (18.9) | -18.8 (17.4) | 0.85 | 1.08 | |
(5-91) | (0-71.6) | (-55.2- -21.6) | ||||
0.7 (0.15) | / | 0.799 (0.15) | 0.097 (0.125) | 0.66 | 0.78 | |
(0.195-1) | (0.522-1) | (-0.193-0.506) | ||||
40.6 (26.4) | / | 61.2 (26.2) | 19.7 (19.9) | 0.81 | 0.99 | |
(7-99) | (9-108) | (-10-70) |
Test-retest reliability of PEM-Part Two, PEM-Part Three, and PEM total expressed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI)_
PEM item/question (Q) | ICC (95%CI) |
---|---|
Q1 | 0.599 (0.228-0.774) |
Q2 | 0.791 (0.630-0.882) |
Q3 | 0.824 (0.687-0.901) |
Q4 | 0.789 (0.626-0.881) |
Q5 | 0.798 (0.642-0.886) |
Q6 | 0.684 (0.440-0.882) |
Q7 | 0.848 (0.730-0.914) |
Q8 | 0.871 (0.770-0.927) |
Q9 | 0.714 (0.493-0.839) |
Q10 | 0.825 (0.690-0.901) |
Q1 | 0.702 (0.471-0.832) |
Q2 | 0.801 (0.647-0.888) |
Q3 | 0.740 (0.539-0.853) |
0.874 (0.777-0.929) |
Demographic and clinical data of patients (n=51), mean number of rehabilitation sessions, and timespan between assessments_
Patients Rehabilitation sessions Timespan between assessments | Number Number Days |
---|---|
51 | |
53.3 (18-78) | |
25 (49) | |
25 (48.1) | |
2 (3.8) | |
3 (5.8) | |
3 (5.8) | |
7 (13.5) | |
5 (9.6) | |
2 (3.8) | |
4 (7.7) | |
29 (56.9) | |
16 (31.4) | |
10.2 (3-23) | |
2.3 (2-4) | |
22.2 (10-80) |