This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Akolekar R, Beta J, Picciarelli G, Ogilvie C, D’Antonio F. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:16‐26. doi: 10.1002/uog.14636.AkolekarRBetaJPicciarelliGOgilvieCD’AntonioFProcedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis20154516‐2610.1002/uog.14636Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Anuwutnavin S, Chanprapaph P, Ruangvutilert P, Eammatta M, Tontisirin P. Short-term outcomes after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis in Siriraj Hospital. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;124:222‐5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.019.AnuwutnavinSChanprapaphPRuangvutilertPEammattaMTontisirinPShort-term outcomes after second-trimester genetic amniocentesis in Siriraj Hospital2014124222‐510.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling. Green top guideline no. 8. Accessed March 13th, 2020 at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_8.pdfAccessed March 13th2020athttps://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_8.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Tabor A, Philip J, Madsen M, Bang J, Obel EB, Nørgaard-Pedersen B. Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women. Lancet. 1986;1:1287‐93. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91218-3.TaborAPhilipJMadsenMBangJObelEBNørgaard-PedersenBRandomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women198611287‐9310.1016/s0140-6736(86)91218-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bakker M, Birnie E, Robles de Medina P, Sollie KM, Pajkrt E, Bilardo CM. Total pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49:599‐606. doi: 10.1002/uog.15986.BakkerMBirnieERoblesde Medina PSollieKMPajkrtEBilardoCMTotal pregnancy loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: a cohort study201749599‐60610.1002/uog.15986Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Beta J, Lesmes-Heredia C, Bedetti C, Akolekar R. Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Ginecol. 2018;70:215‐19. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04178-8.BetaJLesmes-HerediaCBedettiCAkolekarRRisk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review of the literature201870215‐1910.23736/S0026-4784.17.04178-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Prelog PR, Makovec MR, Šimic MV, Sršen TP, Perat M. Individual and contextual factors of nulliparas’ levels of depression, anxiety and fear of childbirth in the last trimester of pregnancy: intimate partner attachment a key factor?. Zdr Varst. 2019;58:112-19. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2019-0015.PrelogPRMakovecMRŠimicMVSršenTPPeratMIndividual and contextual factors of nulliparas’ levels of depression, anxiety and fear of childbirth in the last trimester of pregnancy: intimate partner attachment a key factor?2019581121910.2478/sjph-2019-0015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Globevnik Velikonja V, Lozej T, Leban G, Verdenik I, Vrtačnik Bokal E. The quality of life in pregnant women conceiving through in vitro fertilization. Zdr Varst. 2016;55:1-10. doi: 10.1515/sjph-2016-0001.GlobevnikVelikonja VLozejTLebanGVerdenikIVrtačnikBokal E.The quality of life in pregnant women conceiving through in vitro fertilization20165511010.1515/sjph-2016-0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Salomon LJ, Sotiriadis A, Wulff CB, Odibo A, Akolekar R. Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54:442-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.20353.SalomonLJSotiriadisAWulffCBOdiboAAkolekarRRisk of miscarriage following amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling: systematic review of literature and updated meta-analysis2019544425110.1002/uog.20353Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368:601-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69204-0.RaiRReganLRecurrent miscarriage20063686011110.1016/S0140-6736(06)69204-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ogilvie C, Akolekar R. Pregnancy loss following amniocentesis or CVS sampling-time for a reassessment of risk. J Clin Med. 2014;3:741‐46. doi: 10.3390/jcm3030741.OgilvieCAkolekarRPregnancy loss following amniocentesis or CVS sampling-time for a reassessment of risk20143741‐4610.3390/jcm3030741444965426237475Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Alfirevic Z, Navaratnam K, Mujezinovic F. Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;9:CD003252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003252.pub2.AlfirevicZNavaratnamKMujezinovicFAmniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling for prenatal diagnosis20179CD00325210.1002/14651858.CD003252.pub2648370228869276Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eddleman KA, Malone FD, Sullivan L, Dukes K, Berkowitz RL, Kharbutli Y, et al. Pregnancy loss rates after mid-trimester amniocentesis. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1067-72.EddlemanKAMaloneFDSullivanLDukesKBerkowitzRLKharbutliYet alPregnancy loss rates after mid-trimester amniocentesis200610810677210.1097/01.AOG.0000240135.13594.0717077226Search in Google Scholar
Kong CW, Leung TN, Leung TY, Chan LW, Sahota DS, Fung TY, et al. Risk factors for procedure-related fetal losses after mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis. Prenat Diagn. 2006;26:925-30. doi: 10.1002/pd.1528.KongCWLeungTNLeungTYChanLWSahotaDSFungTYet alRisk factors for procedure-related fetal losses after mid-trimester genetic amniocentesis2006269253010.1002/pd.152816838383Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Won RH, Currier RJ, Lorey F, Towner DR. The timing of demise in fetuses with trisomy 21 and trisomy 18. Prenat Diagn. 2005; 25: 60811. doi: 10.1002/pd.1243.WonRHCurrierRJLoreyFTownerDRThe timing of demise in fetuses with trisomy 21 and trisomy 182005256081110.1002/pd.124316032775Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wah YM, Leung TY, Cheng YKY, Sahota DS. Procedure-related fetal loss following chorionic villus sampling after first-trimester aneuploidy screening. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;41:184-90. doi: 10.1159/000447538.WahYMLeungTYChengYKYSahotaDSProcedure-related fetal loss following chorionic villus sampling after first-trimester aneuploidy screening2017411849010.1159/00044753827399158Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Canadian agency for drugs and technologies and health. Non-invasive prenatal testing: a review of the cost effectiveness and guidelines. Accessed October 30th at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK274056/Accessed October 30th athttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK274056/Search in Google Scholar
Benn P, Cuckle H, Pergament E. Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:15-33. doi: 10.1002/uog.12513.BennPCuckleHPergamentENon-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects201342153310.1002/uog.1251323765643Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jummaat F, Ahmad S, Mohamed Ismail NA. 5-Year review on amniocentesis and its maternal fetal complications. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig. 2019;40. doi: 10.1515/hmbci-2019-0006.JummaatFAhmadSMohamedIsmail NA5-Year review on amniocentesis and its maternal fetal complications20194010.1515/hmbci-2019-000631539354Open DOISearch in Google Scholar