[
Abdelfateh, K. – Mohamed, B. – Fattah, M. Y. (2021) Numerical Modeling of the Pipeline Uplift Mechanism in Clay, Archives of Hydro–Engineering and Environmental Mechanics, Vol. 68 (2021), No. 2, pp. 119–135, DOI: 10.2478/heem–2021–0007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ahmed, M. R. – Tran, V.D.H. – Meguid, M. A. (2015) On the Role of Geogrid Reinforcement in Reducing Earth Pressure on Buried Pipes: Experimental and Numerical Investigations, Soils and Foundations 2015; 55(3): 588–599, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.04.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alotaibi, E. – Omar, M. – Shanableh, A. – Zeiada, W. – Fattah, M. Y. – Tahmaz, A. – Arab, M. G. (2021) Geogrid Bridging over Existing Shallow Flexible PVC Buried Pipe – Experimental Study, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 113 (2021) 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103945.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arockiasamy, M. – Chaallal, O. – Limpeteeparakarn, T. (2006) Full–Scale Field Tests on Flexible Pipes under Live Load Application, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 21–27.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ASTM D422–07: Materials Standard Test Method For Practical– Size Analysis of Soils, American Society for Testing and Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ASTM D4253–00: Standard Test Method for Maximum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils Using a Vibratory Table, Soil and Rock (I), Vol. 04.08. American Society for Testing and Materials.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ASTM, D4254 (2003) Standard Test Methods for Minimum Index Density and Unit Weight of Soils and Calculation of Relative Density, Soil and Rock (I), Vol. 04.08, American Society for Testing and Materials.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ASTM, D854 (2003) Standard Test Method for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer, Soil and Rock (I), Vol. 04.08.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ASTM, D3080 (2003) Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils under Consolidated Drained Conditions, Soil and Rock (I), Vol. 04.08.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ASTM D6637 (2011) Standard Test Method for Determining Tensile Properties of Geogrids by the Single or Multi–Rib Tensile Method, American Society for Testing and Materials.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BSI, 2000 British Standard Institute (BSI), Plastics Pipe Work (Thermo Plastics Materials). Code of Practice for the Installation of Unplasticized PVC Pipe Work for Gravity Drains and Sewers. BS5955.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christ, M. – Park, J. – Hong, S. (2010) Laboratory Observation of the Response of a Buried Pipeline to Freezing Rubber–Sand Backfill, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 22 (9), pp. 943–950.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dash, S. K. – Sireesh, S. – Sitharam, T.G. (2003) Model Studies on Circular Footing Supported on Geocell Reinforced Sand Underlain by Soft Clay, Geotextile and Geomembranes, 21 (4), pp. 197–219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elshesheny, A. – Mohamed, M. – Nagy, N. M. – Sheehan, T (2020) Numerical Behaviour of Buried Flexible Pipes in Geogrid–reinforced Soil under Cyclic Loading, Computers and Geotechnics 122 (2020) 103493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103493.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fattah, M. Y. – Mohammed Redha, W. B. (2016) Effect of Geocell Reinforcement in the Mitigation of Traffic Loads Transmitted to the Flexible Buried Pipes, Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management, Vol. 3, No. 7, pp. 118–128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fattah, M. Y. – Mohammed, H. A. – Hassan, H. A. (2016) Load Transfer and Arching Analysis in Reinforced Embankment, Structures and Buildings, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers UK, DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.15.00046, Paper 1500046, Vol. 169, No. 11, pp. 797–808.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fattah, M. Y. – Hassan, W. H. – Rasheed, S. E. (2018a) Effect of Geocell Reinforcement above Buried Pipes on Surface Settlement, International Review of Civil Engineering (I.RE.C.E.), Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 86–90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fattah, M. Y. – Hassan, W. H. – Rasheed, S. E. (2018b) Behavior of Flexible Buried Pipes Under Geocell Reinforced Subbase Subjected to Repeated Loading, International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 22–41, doi:10.4018/IJGEE.2018010102.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fattah, M. Y. – Mohammed Redha, W. B. (2022) Protection of Flexible Pipes from Dynamic Surface Stresses by Geocell–reinforced Sand Backfill, International Journal of Mining and Geo–Engineering, 56(1), pp. 61–66. doi: 10.22059/ijmge.2021.305293.594854.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garnier, J. (2002) Properties of Soil Samples Used in Centrifuge Models, International Conference on Physical Modeling in Geotechnics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goddard, J.B. (1995) Research Problem Statement for TRB, Committee A2C06 on Culverts and Hydraulic Structures, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hosseini, M. M. S.M. – Moghddas Tafreshi, S. N. (2002) Soil– Structure Interaction of Embedded Pipes under Cyclic Loading Conditions, International Journal of Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 117–124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khademi-Zahedi, R. (2019) Application of the Finite Element Method for Evaluating the Stress Distribution in Buried Damaged Polyethylene Gas Pipes, Underground Space 4 (2019) 59–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2018.05.002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khatib, A. (2010) Bearing Capacity of Granular Soil Overlying Soft Clay Reinforced with Bamboo–Geotextile Composite at the Interface. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Geotechnics and Transportation, Faculty of Civil Engineering University Technology Malaysia, Johor Bahru.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koulbuzewski, J. (1948) General Investigation of the Fundamental Factors Controlling Loose Packing of Sands, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rotterdam, Vol. VII, pp. 47–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, C. – Truong, Q. – Lee, W. – Lee, J. (2010) Characteristics of Rubbers and Particle Mixtures According to Size Ratio, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, 22(4), pp. 323–331.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mahdi, M. – Katebi, H. (2015) Numerical Modeling of Uplift Resistance of Buried Pipelines in Sand Reinforced with Geogrid and Innovative Grid–Anchor System, Geomechanics and Engineering, An International Journal, Vol. 9 No. 6, Techno Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marto, A. – Oghabi, M. –Eisazadeh, A. (2013) The Effect of Geogrid Reinforcement on Bearing Capacity Properties of Soil Under Static Load; A Review, The Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 18 (J), pp. 1881–1898.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehrjardi, G.T. – Moghaddas Tafreshi, S. N. (2008) Buried Pipes Analysis in Reinforced Sand under Repeated Loading, Proceedings of the Second BGA International Foundations Conference, Dundee, UK, pp. 1103–1110.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehrjardi, T. – Moghaddas Tafreshi, S.N. – Dawson, A. R. (2012a) Buried Pipe in Rubber–Soil Backfilled Trenches under Cyclic Loading, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 10. 1061/(ASCE) GT.1943–5606.0000710, Vol. 138, No. 11, pp. 1301–1429.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mehrjardi, T. – Moghaddas Tafreshi, S.N. – Dawson, A. R. (2012b) Combined Use of Geocell Reinforcement and Rubber – Soil Mixtures to Improve Performance of Buried Pipes, Geo-textiles and Geomembranes 34 (2012) 116e130, doi: 10.1016/j. geotexmem.2012.05.004.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Michalowski, R. L. – Shi, L. (2003) Deformation Patterns of Reinforcement Foundation Soil at Failure, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 129(5), pp.421–428.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moghaddas Tafreshi, S. N. – Khalaj, O. (2008) Laboratory Tests of Small–Diameter HDPE Pipes Buried in Reinforced Sand under Repeated–Load, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 26, pp. 145–163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moghaddas Tafreshi, S. N. – Dawson, A.R. (2010) Behavior of Footings on Reinforced Sand Subjected to Repeated Loading – Comparing Use of 3D and Planar Geotextile, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 28, No. 8, pp.434–447.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moghaddas Tafreshi, S. N. – Dawson, A. R. (2012) A Comparison of Static and Cyclic Loading Responses of Foundations on Geo-cell–Reinforced Sand, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 32, pp. 55–68. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2011.12.003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moghaddas Tafreshi, S. N. – Joz Darabi, N. – Dawson, A. R. (2020) Combining EPS Geofoam with Geocell to Reduce Buried Pipe Loads and Trench Surface Rutting, Geotextiles and Geomembranes 48 (2020) 400–418, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.12.011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moser, A. P. – Folkman, S. (2008) Buried Pipe Design, 3rd ed., Mc-Graw– Hill Book Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Selig, E. T. – Packard, D. L. (1987) Buried Concrete Pipe Trench Installation Analysis, Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 113, No. 5, pp. 485–501.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Springman, S. M. (2007) Physical Modeling in Geotechnics, ETHZurich: Institute for Geotechnical Engineering, Professor-ship for Geotechnical Engineering, South American Travelling Tour.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terzi, N. U. – Erenson, C. – Selçuk, M. E. (2015) Geotechnical Properties of Tire–sand Mixtures as Backfill Material for Buried Pipe Installations, Geomechanics and Engineering, An International Journal, Vol. 9 No. 4, Techno Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, J. R. – Kulhawy, F. H. (1987) Experimental Analysis of Drilled Foundations Subjected to Repeated Axial Loads under Drained Conditions, Report EL–S32S, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Witthoeft, A.F. – Kim, H. (2016) Numerical Investigation of Earth Pressure Reduction on Buried Pipes Using EPS Geofoam Compressible Inclusions, Geosynthics International 23 (4), 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.15.00054.
]Search in Google Scholar
