Some Prospects of Libertarian Punishment Theory: Rejoinder to Blasco and Marcos

1. Blasco, E. and D. Marcos. Nulla Libertarian Poena Sine NAP: Reexamination of Libertarian Theories of Punishment. Studia Humana 9 (2), 2020, pp. 83-89.10.2478/sh-2020-0016 Search in Google Scholar

2. Block, W. E., and W. Barnett II. Continuums. Journal Etica e Politica / Ethics & Politics 1, 2008, pp. 151-166. Search in Google Scholar

3. Block, W. E. Libertarian Punishment Theory and Unjust Enrichment. Journal of Business Ethics 154, 1, 2019, pp. 103–108.10.1007/s10551-017-3469-7 Search in Google Scholar

4. Block, W. E. Libertarian Punishment Theory: Working for, and Donating to, the State. Libertarian Papers 1, 2009, pp. 1–31. Search in Google Scholar

5. Block, W. E. Natural Rights, Human Rights, and Libertarianism. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 74, 1, 2015, pp. 29–62.10.1111/ajes.12086 Search in Google Scholar

6. Block, W. E. Radical Libertarianism: Applying Libertarian Principles to Dealing with the Unjust Government, Part I, Reason Papers 27, Fall, 2004, pp. 113–130. Search in Google Scholar

7. Block, W. E. The Non-Aggression Axiom of Libertarianism, LewRockwell.com, 17-Feb-2003. Available at https://www.lewrockwell.com/2003/02/walter-e-block/turning-their-coats-for-the-state [Accessed: May 20, 2022]. Search in Google Scholar

8. Block, W. E. Toward a Libertarian Theory of Guilt and Punishment for the Crime of Statism, In J. G. Hülsmann and S. N. Kinsella, Property, Freedom, and Society: Essays in Honor of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Auburn, United States: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2009, pp. 137–148. Search in Google Scholar

9. Block W. E., and R. Whitehead. Taking the Assets of the Criminal to Compensate Victims of Violence, In W. E. Block and R. Whitehead, Philosophy of Law: The Supreme Court’s Need for Libertarian Law, New York, United States: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, pp. 417–442.10.1007/978-3-030-28360-5_14 Search in Google Scholar

10. Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. Undated. “Guidelines for Arbitrators on how to approach the making of awards on interest.” https://www.ciarb.org/media/4218/2011-making-of-awards-on-interest.pdf Search in Google Scholar

11. ICLG.com. 2021. “https://iclg.com/practice-areas/international-arbitration-laws-and-regulations/3-pre-award-interest-and-the-difference-between-interest-and-investment-returns.” August 20; https://iclg.com/practice-areas/international-arbitration-laws-and-regulations/3-pre-award-interest-andthe-difference-between-interest-and-investment-returns Search in Google Scholar

12. Prejudgment and postjudgment interest rates. 2022. January 10; https://www.ontario.ca/page/prejudgment-and-postjudgment-interest-rates Search in Google Scholar

13. Post Judgment Interest Rate. Undated. https://www.uscourts.gov/services-forms/fees/post-judgment-interest-rate Search in Google Scholar

14. Rothbard, M. N. The Ethics of Liberty, Large Prin. New York, United States: New York University Press, 2014. Search in Google Scholar