[1. Arenhart, J. R. B., and D. Krause. Potentiality and Contradiction in Quantum Mechanics, In A. Koslow and A. Buchsbaum (eds.), The Road to Universal Logic. Festschrift for the 50th Birthday of Jean-Yves Béziau, vol. 2, Basel: Birkhäuser, 2015, pp. 201-211.10.1007/978-3-319-15368-1_8]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Baranov, V., and B. Lourié. The Role of Christ’s Soul-Mediator in the Iconoclastic Christology, In G. Heidl and R. Somos (eds.), Origeniana nona: Origen and the Religious Practice of His Time. Papers of the 9th International Origen Congress, Pécs, Hungary, 29 August-2 September 2005, (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium, 228), Leuven Walpole, MA: Peeters, 2009, pp. 403-411.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Baranov, V. ‘Condensing and Shaping the Flesh…’: The Incarnation and the Instrumental Function of the Soul of Christ in the Iconoclastic Christology, In S. Kaczmarek, H. Pietras, and A. Dziadowiec (eds.), Origeniana decima: Origen as Writer. Papers of the 10th International Origen Congress, University School of Philosophy and Education “Ignatianum”, Kraków, Poland, 31 August-4 September 2009, (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum theologicarum Lovaniensium, 244), Leuven Walpole, MA: Peeters, 2011, pp. 919-932.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Baranov, V. Amphilochia 231 of Patriarch Photius as a Possible Source on the Christology of Byzantine Iconoclasts, Studia Patristica 68, 2013, pp. 371-380.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Barnes, J. (ed.). The Complete Works of Aristotle, The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. 2, (Bollingen series 71:2), Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Basil of Caesarea. Adversus Eunomium libri V, PG 29, 497-768.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Beall, J. C., and G. Restall. Logical Pluralism, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288403.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Chernoff, F. Leibniz’s Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles, The Philosophical Quarterly 31, 1981, pp. 126-138.10.2307/2218719]Search in Google Scholar
[9. da Costa, N. C. A., and D. Krause. The Logic of Complementarity, In J. van Benthem et al. (eds.), The Age of Alternative Logics: Assessing Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics Today (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, 3), Dordrecht: Springer, 2006, pp. 103-120.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Diekamp, F. Doctrina Patrum de incarnatione Verbi. Ein griechisches Florilegium aus der Wende des 7. und 8. Jh. 2, Aufl. mit Korr. und Nachträgen von B. Phanurgakis, hrsg. von E. Chrysos, Münster: Aschendorff, 1981.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Ebied, R. Y., A. Van Roey, and L. R. Wickham (eds.). Peter of Callinicum. Anti–Tritheist Dossier (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta, 10), Leuven: Peeters, 1981.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Follieri, H. Initia Hymnorum Ecclesiae Graecae, vol. 2, Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1961.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. French, S., and D. Krause. Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.10.1093/0199278245.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Henry, R. (ed.). Photius, Bibliothèque. Tome V (« Codices » 230–241), (Collection byzantine), Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1967.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Konstantinovsky, J. Dionysius the Areopagite versus Aristotle? The Two Points of Reference for Gregory Palamas in Initial Confrontations with Barlaam the Calabrian, Studia Patristica 42, 2006, pp. 313-319.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Krausmüller, D. An embattled charismatic: Assertiveness and invective in Nicetas Stethatos’ Spiritual Centuries, Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies (forthcoming).]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Krausmüller, D. Between Tritheism and Sabellianism: Trinitarian Speculation in John Italos’ and Nicetas Stethatos’ Confessions of Faith, Scrinium 12, 2016, pp. 261-280.10.1163/18177565-00121p14]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Krausmüller, D. Divine Genus – Divine Species: John Philoponus’ Impact on Contemporary Chalcedonian Theology, In J. E. Rutherford (ed.), The Mystery of Christ in the Fathers of the Church: Essays in honour of D. Vincent Twomey SVD, Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2011, pp. 94-105.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Krausmüller, D. Hiding in Plain Sight: Heterodox Trinitarian Speculation in the Writings of Nicetas Stethatos, Scrinium 9, 2013, pp. 255-284.10.1163/18177565-90000081]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Krausmüller, D. On the relation between the Late Antique and Byzantine Christological discourses: Observations about Theodore of Stoudios.’ Third Antirrheticus. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik (forthcoming).]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Krausmüller, D. Responding to John Philoponus: Hypostases, Particular Substances and Perichoresis in the Trinity. Journal for Late Antique Religion and Culture 9, 2015, pp. 13-28.10.18573/j.2015.10330]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Lang, U. M. John Philoponus and the Controversies over Chalcedon in the Sixth Century. A Study and Translation of the “Arbiter” (Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense, 47), Leuven: Peeters, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Larchet, J.-Cl. La divinisation de l’homme selon saint Maxime le Confesseur (Cogitatio Fidei, 194), Paris: Cerf, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Lebon, I. (ed.), Severi Antiocheni Liber contra impium Grammaticum, Oratio prima et secunda (CSCO, vols. 111-112; Scriptores Syri, tt. 58-59) [Ser. IV, t. IV], Paris: E typographeo republicae, 1938.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Leibniz, G. W. Sämtliche Schriften und Briefe, Hrsg. Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR, Reihe 6., Bd. 6. Berilin: Akademie–Verl., 1990.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Lourié, B. A Logical Scheme and Paraconsistent Topological Separation in Byzantium: Inter–Trinitarian Relations according to Hieromonk Hierotheos and Joseph Bryennios, In D. Bertini and D. Migliorini (eds.), Relations: Ontology and Philosophy of Religion (Mimesis International. Philosophy, n. 24), [Sesto San Giovanni (Milano)]: Mimesis International, 2018, pp. 283-299.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Lourié, B. Damian of Alexandria, In S. Uhlig (ed.), Encyclopaedia Aethiopica, vol. 2, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2005, pp. 77-78.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Lourié, B. Julianism, In S. Uhlig (ed.), Encyclopaedia Aethiopica, vol. 3, Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2007, pp. 308-310.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Lourié, B. Le second iconoclasme en recherche de la vraie doctrine. Studia Patristica 34, 2001, pp. 145-169.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Lourié, B. Leontius of Byzantium and His ‘Theory of Graphs’ against John Philoponus” In M. Knežević (ed.), The Ways of Byzantine Philosophy (Contemporary Christian thought series, no. 32), Alhambra, CA: Sebastian Press, Western American Diocese of the Serbian Orthodox Church; Faculty of Philosophy, Kosovska Mitrovica, 2015, pp. 143-170.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Lourié, B. Nicephorus Blemmydes on the Holy Trinity and the Paraconsistent Notion of Numbers: A Logical Analysis of a Byzantine Approach to the Filioque, Studia Humana 5, 2016, pp. 40-54.10.1515/sh-2016-0004]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Lourié, B. Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite: Modal Ontology, In A. Schumann (ed.), Logic in Orthodox-Christian Thought, Heusenstamm bei Frankfurt: Ontos-Verlag, 2013, pp. 230-257.10.1515/9783110320626.230]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Lourié, B. Une dispute sans justes: Léon de Chalcédoine, Eustrate de Nicée et la troisième querelle sur les images sacrées, Studia Patristica 42, 2006, pp. 321-339.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Lourié, B. What Means “Tri–” in “Trinity”? An Eastern Patristic Approach to the ‘Quasi-Ordinals,’ Journal of Applied Logic (forthcoming).]Search in Google Scholar
[35. [Lourié, B.] Лурье, В. М. История византийской философии. Формативный период [A History of the Byzantine Philosophy: The Formative Period], Санкт-Петербург: Axiōma, 2006.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Nicephorus of Constantinople, Refutatio et eversio deliramentorum… [Antirrhetici adversus Constantinum Copronymum], In PG 100, 205-533.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Patterson, R. Aristotle’s modal logic. Essence and entailment in the Organon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.10.1017/CBO9780511609015]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Priest, G., K. Tanaka, and Z. Weber. Paraconsistent Logic, In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/logic-paraconsistent/.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Priest, G. Doubt Truth to Be a Liar, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.10.1093/0199263280.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Rosenfeld, L. (ed.). Niels Bohr. Collected Works, vol. 3: The Correspondence Principle (1918-1923), J. Rud Nielsen (ed.), Amsterdam New York Oxford: North-Holland Publ. Co., 1976.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Sinkewicz, R. E. A New Interpretation for the First Episode in the Controversy between Barlaam the Calabrian and Gregory Palamas, Journal of Theological Studies 31, 1980, pp. 489-500.10.1093/jts/XXXI.2.489]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Sinkewicz, R. E. The Solutions Addressed to Georges Lapithes by Barlaam the Calabrian and Their Philosophical Context, Medieval Studies 43, 1981, pp. 151-217.10.1484/J.MS.2.306270]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Tanaka, K., F. Berto, E. Mares, and F. Paoli (eds.). Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications (Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, 26), Dordrecht: Springer, 2013.10.1007/978-94-007-4438-7]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Theodore the Studite. Antirrhetici adversus iconomachos, In PG 99, 327-436.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Treadgold, W. T. The Nature of the Bibliotheca of Photius (Dumbarton Oaks Studies, 18), Washington, D C: Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies, 1980.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Van Roey, A. Les fragments trithéites de Jean Philopon, Orientalia Lovaniensia Periodica, vol. 11, 1980, pp. 135-163.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Wellesz, E. A History of the Byzantine Music and Hymnography, 2nd ed., Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Westerink, L. G. (ed.). Photii Patriarchae Constantinopolitani Epistulae et Amphilochia, vol. 6, fasc. 1, (Bibliotheca scriptorium graecorum et romanorum Teubneriana), Leipzig: Teubner, 1987.10.1007/978-3-663-12291-3]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Васюков, В. Л. Логика Галена: наследие Аристотеля или научная инновация? [Vasyukov, V. L. Galen’s Logic: Aristotelian Heritage or Scientific Innovation?], История медицины, vol. 2, 2015, pp. 5-16.10.17720/2409-5583.t2.1.2015.01v]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Желтов, М. “Догматик” [Zheltov, Mikhail. “Dogmatikon”] In Православная энциклопедия, vol. 15, Москва: ЦНТ «Православная энциклопедия», 2007, pp. 532-533.]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Христов, И. Битие и съществуване в дискусията за метода между св.Григорий Палама и Варлаам [Christov, I. Being and Existence in the Discussion on the Method between St. Gregory Palamas and Barlaam] In Хуманизъм. Култура. Религия (Sofia: «Лик», 1997), pp. 37-48; translated into Russian by Ilya Bey as “Бытие и существование в дискуссии св. Григория Паламы и Варлаама о методе”, In Г. Каприев, И. Г. Бей и др. (сост.), Современная болгарская патрология. Сборник статей, (Национальные патрологии), Киев: Издательский отдел Украинской Православной Церкви, 2016, pp. 125-138.]Search in Google Scholar