<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p> he process of decision making is predictable and irrational according to Daniel Ariely and other economic behaviorists, historians, and philosophers such as Daniel Kahneman or Yuval Noah Harari. Decisions made anteriorly can be, but don’t have to be, present in the actions of a person. Stories and shared belief in myths, especially those that arise from a system of human norms and values and are based on a belief in a “supernatural” order (religion) are important. Because of this, mass cooperation amongst strangers is possible.</p></abstract>

he process of decision making is predictable and irrational according to Daniel Ariely and other economic behaviorists, historians, and philosophers such as Daniel Kahneman or Yuval Noah Harari. Decisions made anteriorly can be, but don’t have to be, present in the actions of a person. Stories and shared belief in myths, especially those that arise from a system of human norms and values and are based on a belief in a “supernatural” order (religion) are important. Because of this, mass cooperation amongst strangers is possible.

The Emotivism of Law. Systematic Irrationality, Imagined Orders, and the Spirit of Decision Making

Studia Humana

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

he process of decision making is predictable and irrational according to Daniel Ariely and other economic behaviorists, historians, and philosophers such as...

The Emotivism of Law. Systematic Irrationality, Imagined Orders, and the Spirit of Decision Making

Publié en ligne: 07 nov. 2018

Pages: 16 - 29

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2018-0020

Mots clés
systematic irrationality, imagined orders, myths, behavioral economics, philosophy

© 2018 Adrian Mróz, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

The Emotivism of Law. Systematic Irrationality, Imagined Orders, and the Spirit of Decision Making

Publié en ligne: 07 nov. 2018

Pages: 16 - 29

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sh-2018-0020

Mots cléssystematic irrationality, imagined orders, myths, behavioral economics, philosophy

© 2018 Adrian Mróz, published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Mots clés
systematic irrationality, imagined orders, myths, behavioral economics, philosophy