Connexion
S'inscrire
Réinitialiser le mot de passe
Publier & Distribuer
Solutions d'édition
Solutions de distribution
Thèmes
Architecture et design
Arts
Business et économie
Chimie
Chimie industrielle
Droit
Géosciences
Histoire
Informatique
Ingénierie
Intérêt général
Linguistique et sémiotique
Littérature
Mathématiques
Musique
Médecine
Pharmacie
Philosophie
Physique
Sciences bibliothécaires et de l'information, études du livre
Sciences des matériaux
Sciences du vivant
Sciences sociales
Sport et loisirs
Théologie et religion
Études classiques et du Proche-Orient ancient
Études culturelles
Études juives
Publications
Journaux
Livres
Comptes-rendus
Éditeurs
Blog
Contact
Chercher
EUR
USD
GBP
Français
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Panier
Home
Journaux
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Édition 40 (2018): Edition 4 (December 2018)
Accès libre
Numerical solution through mathematical modelling of unsteady MHD flow past a semi-infinite vertical moving plate with chemical reaction and radiation
Anupam Bhandari
Anupam Bhandari
| 31 déc. 2018
Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica
Édition 40 (2018): Edition 4 (December 2018)
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Résumé
Article
Figures et tableaux
Références
Auteurs
Articles dans cette édition
Aperçu
PDF
Citez
Partagez
Article Category:
Research Article
Publié en ligne:
31 déc. 2018
Pages:
270 - 281
Reçu:
27 août 2018
Accepté:
15 nov. 2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/sgem-2018-0041
Mots clés
MHD flow
,
chemical reaction
,
radiation
,
numerical solution
© 2018 Anupam Bhandari, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Figure 1
Sketch of the flow geometry.
Figure 2
Velocity profiles for different times at M = 2, K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,ϕ = 2, Q1 = 2, Sc = 0.2,γ = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 3
Temperature profiles for different times at M = 2, K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,ϕ = 2, Q1 = 2, Sc = 0.2,γ = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 4
Concentration profiles for different times at M = 2, K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,ϕ = 2, Q1 = 2, Sc = 0.2,γ = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 5
Steady state velocity profiles for different values of M at K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,ϕ = 2, Q1 = 2, Sc = 0.2,γ = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 6
Steady state temperature profiles for different values of M at K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,ϕ = 2, Q1 = 2, Sc = 0.2,γ = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 7
Steady state concentration profiles for different values of M at K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,ϕ = 2, Q1 = 2, Sc = 0.2,γ = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 8
Steady state velocity profiles for different values of Sc at M = 2, K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,ϕ = 2, Q1 = 2, γ = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 9
Steady state temperature profiles for different values of Sc at M = 2, K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,ϕ = 2, Q1 = 2, γ = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 10
Steady state concentration profiles for different values of Sc at M = 2, K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,ϕ = 2, Q1 = 2, γ = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 11
Steady state concentration profiles for different values of γ at M = 2, K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,ϕ = 2, Q1 = 2, Sc = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 12
Steady state temperature profiles for different values of ϕ at M = 2, K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,γ = 0.2, Q1 = 2, Sc = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .
Figure 13
Steady state concentration profiles for different values of ϕ at M = 2, K = 2, Gr = 2, Gm = 2, Pr = 0.72,γ = 0.2, Q1 = 2, Sc = 0.2,ϕ 1 = 0.2, m = 0.5 .