Non-Traditional Security Threats and NATO’s Response in the Contemporary Security Environment

1 “Active Engagement, Modern Defence”. Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation adopted by Heads of State and Government in Lisbon, 19 November 2010. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_56626.htm Search in Google Scholar

2 “NATO and climate change: How big is the problem?”, BBC, 15 June 2021, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-57476349 Search in Google Scholar

3 “On the Extension of the New START Treaty with the Russian Federation”, Press Statement Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State, February 3, 2021. https://www.state.gov/on-the-extension-of-the-new-start-treaty-with-the-russian-federation/ Search in Google Scholar

4 ABM Treaty Fact Sheet, Announcement of Withdrawal from the ABM Treaty, December 13, 2001, https://georgewbushwhitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2001/12/20011213-2.html#:~:text=The%20United%20States%20must%20defend,missile%20defense%20of%20our%20territory Search in Google Scholar

5 Amar Causevic, “Facing an Unpredictable Threat: Is NATO Ideally Placed to Manage Climate Change as a Non-Traditional Threat Multiplier?”, Connections, Vol. 16, No. 2 (Spring 2017), pp. 59-80, Published by: Partnership for Peace Consortium of Defense Academies and Security Studies Institutes Search in Google Scholar

6 Brzezinski, Z. (2006). Zgjedhja: dominim global apo udhëheqje globale [The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership] (pp. 43-44). Prishtinë: Zenit. Search in Google Scholar

7 Brzezinski, Z. (2006). Zgjedhja: dominim global apo udhëheqje globale [The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership] (p. 106). Prishtinë: Zenit. Search in Google Scholar

8 Bush, G. W. (2001, February 27). Address to the Joint Session of the 107th Congress. The United States Congress Washington, D.C. Retrieved from https://georgewbushwhitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/bushrecord/documents/Selected_Speeches_George_W_Bush.pdf Search in Google Scholar

9 Buzan, B., & Herring, E. (1998). The Arms Dynamic in World Politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

10 Commission on Conventional Armaments (CCA), UN document S/C.3/32/Rev.1, August 1948, as quoted in UN, Office of Public Information, The United Nations and Disarmament, 1945–1965, UN Publication 67.I.8, 28: W. Seth Carus, “Defining “Weapons of Mass Destruction” Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction Occasional Paper, No. 8, National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. January 2012. Search in Google Scholar

11 David C. Rappoport, “The Four Waves of Rebel Terror and September 11”, Anthropoetics VIII, no. 1 Spring/Summer 2002. Search in Google Scholar

12 Hedley Bull, The Control of Arms Race. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1961. Search in Google Scholar

13 Hub, I. S. K. (2014). NATO Stresses Climate Change Impacts on Security | News | SDG Knowledge Hub | IISD. http://sdg.iisd.org/news/nato-stresses-climate-change-impacts-on-security/ Search in Google Scholar

14 John W. Spanier and Joseph L. Nogee, The Politics of Disarmament: A Study in Soviet-American Gamesmanship. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1962, p. 15. Search in Google Scholar

15 Joseph S.Nye Jr. and David A. Welch “Konflikti dhe bashkëpunimi në marrëdhëniet ndërkombëtare: hyrje në teori dhe histori”, Tiranë: Botimet Dudaj, 2014, p. 508. Search in Google Scholar

16 Michael Scrima and Jurgis Vedrickas, “Non-Traditional Threats and NATO: A Look Toward an Expanded Role for the NATO Alliance”, Eastern Europe Studies Centre, Lituani, (2020), https://www.eesc.lt/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Non-Traditional-Threats-and-NATO.pdf Search in Google Scholar

17 NATO 2030: United for a New Era, 25 November 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2020/12/pdf/201201-Reflection-Group-Final-Report-Uni.pdf Search in Google Scholar

18 NATO Advisory Group on Emerging and Disruptive Technologies. (2020). Annual Report 2020. Retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2021/3/pdf/210303-EDT-adv-grp-annual-report-2020.pdf Search in Google Scholar

19 NATO 2022 strategic concept, Adopted by Heads of State and Government at the NATO Summit in Madrid 29 June 2022. Retrieved from: https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/290622-strategic-concept.pdf Search in Google Scholar

20 North Atlantic Treaty Organization. (2023). Emerging security challenges. Retrieved from https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_48895.htm Search in Google Scholar

21 Obama, B. (2009, April 5). Remarks by President Barack Obama In Prague As Delivered. THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-barack-obama-prague-delivered Search in Google Scholar

22 Schmid, A. (2011). The Problem of Defining Terrorism. In A. Schmid (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research (Chapter 2). Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

23 Tannenwald, N. (2018). The Vanishing Nuclear Taboo? How Disarmament Fell Apart. Foreign Affairs, 97(6), 16-24. Search in Google Scholar

24 The Secretary General’s Report Climate Change & Security Impact Assessment (2022). In https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/280622-climate-impact-assessment.pdf. NATO. Search in Google Scholar

25 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, 7 July 2017, 2363 U.N.T.S. 249. Search in Google Scholar

26 Williams, P. (2013). Strategjia për një botë të re: lufta kundër terrorizmit dhe krimit të organizuar transnacional [Strategy for a new world: Fighting terrorism and transnational organized crime]. In J. Baylis, J. J. Wirtz, C. S. Gray, & E. Cohen (Eds.), Strategjia në botën bashkëkohore; Hyrje në studimet e strategjisë [Contemporary Strategy: An Introduction to the Study of Strategy] (p. 248). UET Press. Search in Google Scholar