[
Adam, Frame. 2011. “Regional Innovation Performance in Light of Social-Capital Research and Application.” Social Science Information 50 (3–4), 414–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018411411022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Agrawal, Ajay, Devesh Kapur, John McHale. 2011. “Brain drain or brain bank? The impact of skilled emigration on poor-country innovation”. Journal of Urban Economics 69, 43-55
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balland, Pierre-Alexandre. 2012. “Proximity and the Evolution of Collaboration Networks: Evidence from Research and Development Projects within the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) Industry”. Regional Studies 46(6), 741-756
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beck, Ulrich, Giddens Anthony, and Lash Scott. 1994. Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beckert, Jens. 2010. “How Do Fields Change? The Interrelations of Institutions, Networks, and Cognition in the Dynamics of Markets.” Organization Studies 31 (5), 605–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610372184.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beckert, Jens. 1999. “Agency, Entrepreneurs, and Institutional Change. The Role of Strategic Choice and Institutionalized Practices in Organizations”. Sage Journals. 20 (5), 777-799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840699205004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beckert, Jens. 2003. “Economic Sociology and Embeddedness: How Shall We Conceptualize Economic Action?” Journal of Economic 37 (3), 769–87.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Box-Steffensmeier, Hery Brady and David Collier (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cepoi, Victor and Tea Golob. 2016. “Regional innovation performance: measuring development in cultural, social and economic perspectives.” Innovation Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences 9 (1), 242 – 260
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cepoi, Victor and Tea Golob. 2017. “Innovation Performance in the EU Comparative Perspective: The Interplay of Social Forces in the Context of National Innovation Systems.” Comparative Sociology. 16 (4), 555-579
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cepoi, Victor and Rončević Borut. 2015. “Social fields theory explaining innovations and developmental performance.” 4th International Conference on Economics, Political and Law Sciences (Business and economic series), pp. 38 – 47
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cepoi, Victor. 2018. Social Networks as Factors for Innovation. Doctoral dissertation
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cepoi, Victor and Alenka Pandiloska Jurak. 2023. “Measuring the relevance and impact of innovation and social forces for Transnational Value Chain’s embeddedness in a region” PloS ONE 18 (10), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291646
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coleman, James. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital” The American Journal of Sociology 94: 95–120.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Meur, Gisele and Rihoux Benoit. 2002. “L’analyse Quali- Quantitative Comparee (AQQC-QCA): Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium: Academia-Bruylant, 175pp
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DiMagio, Paul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition” Annual Review of Sociology 23:263-287, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DiMagio, Paul and Powell, Walter W. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields” American Sociological Review 48 (2):147-160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dose, Jennifer. 1997. “Work values: An integrative framework and illustrative application to organizational socialization”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 70 (3), 219-240. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tbb00645.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fligstein, N., and D. McAdam. 2012. “Response to Goldstone and Useem.” Sociological Theory 30 (1), 48–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112437170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fligstein, Neil. 2001. “Social skill and the theory of fields”. Sociological Theory 19: 105–125.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fligstein, Neil and Dioun Cyrus. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Paris: Elsevier
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fritsch, Michael and Slavitchev Viktor. 2011. “Determinants of the efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems.” Regional Studies 45 (7), 905-918
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gangaliuc, Cristiam. 2022. The role of transnational value chains in regional innovation. Analysis of Central and Eastern European regions engaged in automotive and electronics production networks. Doctoral dissertation
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Granovetter, Mark 1992. “Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis”. Acta sociologica. 35 (1), 3-11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heger, Diana. 2004. “The Link Between Firms? Innovation Decision and the Business Cycle: An Empirical Analysis.” ZEW Discussion Papers 04-85, ZEW - Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kastelle, Tim, Jason Potts, and Mark Dodgson. 2009. “The Evolution of Innovation Systems.” DRUID Summer Conference 2009 on Innovation, Strategy and Knowledge, 26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawton Smith, Helen, and Waters Rupert. 2011. “Scientific labour Markets, Networks and Regional Innovation Systems”. Regional Studies. 45 (7), 961-976
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Modic, Dolores and Borut Rončević. 2018. “Social topography for sustainable innovation policy: Putting institutions, social networks, and cognitive frames in their place”. Comparative Sociology. 17, 100-127.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Naghavi, Alireza, and Chiara Strozzi. 2015. “Intellectual Property Rights, Diasporas, and Domestic Innovation.” Journal of International Economics 96 (1), 150–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2015.01.007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Napelski, Daniel. 2019. “How to Facilitate Digital Innovation in Europe”. Intereconomics. 54, 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-019-0791-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Naujoks, Daniel. 2022. “A Transnational Research Agenda on the Determinants, Policies, and Impacts of Diaspora Direct Investments.” Research in Globalization 4 (June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2022.100083.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
North, D. C. 1981. “Structure and Change in Economic History.” New York: Norton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ragin, Charles. 2008. “Measurement versus calibration: a set-theoretic approach.” Chicago Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rončević, Borut and Modic, Dolores (2012). “Regional Systems of Innovations as Social Fields” Sociologija i prostor 191 (3), 313-333, doi 10.5673/sip.49.3.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, Carsten Q and Wagemann Claudius (2012) ‘Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences’. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sinatti, Giulia, Horst, Cindy. 2015. “Migrants as agents of development: Diaspora engagement discourse and practice in Europe”. Ethnicities 15 (1), 134-152 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796814530120
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilkinson, Kate. 1970. “Phases and roles in community action.” Rural Sociology 35 (1), 54-68.
]Search in Google Scholar
