Student Discussion from an Evolutionary Perspective

BARCELÓ, J. A., BERNAL, F. D. C., DEL OLMO, R., MAMELI, L., QUESADA, F. M., POZA, D., & VILÀ, X. (2014). Social Interaction in Hunter-Gatherer Societies Simulating the Consequences of Cooperation and Social Aggregation. Social Science Computer Review, 32(3), 417-436.10.1177/0894439313511943Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

BERNARD, S., MERCIER, H., & CLÉMENT, F. (2012). The power of well-connected arguments: Early sensitivity to the connective because. Journal of experimental child psychology, 111(1), 128-135.10.1016/j.jecp.2011.07.003Search in Google Scholar

BRUFFEE, K. A. (1984). Collaborative learning and the” conversation of mankind”. College English, 635-652.10.2307/376924Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

CROUCH, C. H., & MAZUR, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.10.1119/1.1374249Search in Google Scholar

FINLEY, A. (2011). Civic learning and democratic engagements: A review of the literature on civic engagement in post-secondary education. Unpublished paper. Accessed October, 12, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

FLYNN, A. E., & KLEIN, J. D. (2001). The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 71-86.10.1007/BF02504916Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

FREEMAN, S., EDDY, S. L., MCDONOUGH, M., SMITH, M. K., OKOROAFOR, N., JORDT, H., & WENDEROTH, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 201319030.10.1073/pnas.1319030111Search in Google Scholar

GEARY, D. C. (2000). Principles of evolutionary educational psychology. Learning and individual differences, 12(4), 317-345.10.1016/S1041-6080(02)00046-8Search in Google Scholar

GLASSMAN, R. M. (1986). Democracy and despotism in primitive societies: A neo-Weberian approach to political theory. Port Washington, N.Y: Associated Faculty Press.Search in Google Scholar

HILL, K. R., WALKER, R. S., BOŽIČEVIĆ, M., EDER, J., HEADLAND, T., HEWLETT, B., ... & WOOD, B. (2011). Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science, 331(6022), 1286-1289.Search in Google Scholar

JONES, M., & SUGDEN, R. (2001). Positive confirmation bias in the acquisition of information. Theory and Decision, 50(1), 59-99.10.1023/A:1005296023424Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

KUHN, D., & CROWELL, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545-552.10.1177/095679761140251221422465Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

KYNDT, E., RAES, E., LISMONT, B., TIMMERS, F., CASCALLAR, E., & DOCHY, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings?. Educational Research Review, 10, 133-149.10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002Search in Google Scholar

LAUGHLIN, P. R., & ELLIS, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(3), 177-189.10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

MAZUR, E. (1997). Peer instruction (pp. 9-18). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

MCGARTY, C., TURNER, J. C., HOGG, M. A., DAVID, B., & WETHERELL, M. S. (1992). Group polarization as conformity to the prototypical group member. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31(1), 1-19.10.1111/j.2044-8309.1992.tb00952.xOuvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

MERCIER, H. (2011). On the universality of argumentative reasoning. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11(1-2), 1-2.10.1163/156853711X568707Search in Google Scholar

MERCIER, H., & SPERBER, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and brain sciences, 34(02), 57-74.10.1017/S0140525X10000968Search in Google Scholar

MERCIER, H., BOUDRY, M., PAGLIERI, F., & TROUCHE, E. (2017). Natural-born arguers: Teaching how to make the best of our reasoning abilities. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 1-16.10.1080/00461520.2016.1207537Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

MOSHMAN, D., & GEIL, M. (1998). Collaborative reasoning: Evidence for collective rationality. Thinking & Reasoning, 4(3), 231-248.10.1080/135467898394148Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

NAGDA, B. R. A., GURIN, P., & LOPEZ, G. E. (2003). Transformative pedagogy for democracy and social justice. Race, ethnicity and education, 6(2), 165-191.10.1080/13613320308199Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

NUSSBAUM, E. M., & SINATRA, G. M. (2003). Argument and conceptual engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(3), 384-395.10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00038-3Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

OSBORNE, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463-466.Search in Google Scholar

PRINCE, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231.10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.xSearch in Google Scholar

PRITCHARD, J. K. (2010). How we are evolving. Scientific American, 303(4), 40-47.10.1038/scientificamerican1010-40Search in Google Scholar

RICHTER, F. D., & TJOSVOLD, D. (1980). Effects of student participation in classroom decision making on attitudes, peer interaction, motivation, and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 74.10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.74Search in Google Scholar

SAFARI, M., YAZDANPANAH, B., GHAFARIAN, H. R., & YAZDANPANAH, S. (2006). Comparing the effect of lecture and discussion methods on students learning and satisfaction. Iranian journal of medical education, 6(1), 59-64.Search in Google Scholar

SUNSTEIN, C. R. (2002). The law of group polarization. Journal of political philosophy, 10(2), 175-195.10.1111/1467-9760.00148Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

TATTERSALL, I. (2009). “Language and the origin of symbolic thought,” in Cognitive Archaeology and Human Evolution, eds S. A. De Beaune, F. L. Coolidge, and T. G. Wynn (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press), 109–116.Search in Google Scholar

TROUCHE, E., SANDER, E., & MERCIER, H. (2014). Arguments, More than Confidence, Explain the Good Performance of Reasoning Groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General (Forthcoming).10.1037/a0037099Ouvrir le DOISearch in Google Scholar

• From Therapy to Technological Enhancement: A Socio-Ethical Perspective
• Digital and Communication Competences of Foreign Language Teachers in Poland
• The Linguistic and Typological Features of Clickbait in Youtube Video Titles
• Communicating Values Exemplified in a Catastrophic Media Image of New Technology and Media Usage in Black Mirror Based on Selected Examples
• Freedom of Communication in Science in the Context of the Development of Modern Information and Communication Technologies
• Acquiring Marketing Communication Competences of the Future - Expectations of Polish Students
• Functions of Visual Public Relations. On Visual Meaning-Making in PR Practice
• Can Stock Market Fluctuations Be Predicted? Wig.Games Index Secret on the Example of CD Project
• Animals in the Anthropocene Epoch. On the Importance of Visual Materials in the Pro-Animal Movement