Sustainable Operating Rooms: A Comprehensive Framework for Environmental Impact Analysis

[1] Karliner J., Slotterback S., R Boyd., Ashby B., Steele K. Healthcare’s climate footprint: How the health sector contributes to the global climate crisis and opportunities for action. European Journal of Public Health 2020:30. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.843Search in Google Scholar

[2] Sustainable Development Unit, Public Health England, NHS England. Reducing the use of natural resources in health and social care. Cambridge: Sustainable Development Unit [Online]. [Accessed 30.04.2020]. Available: https://www.sduhealth.org.uk/policy-strategy/reporting/sustainable-development-in-health-and-care-report2018.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Lee B.-K., Ellenbecker M. J., Moure-Eraso R. Analyses of the recycling potential of medical plastic wastes. Waste Management 2002:22(5):461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00006-5Search in Google Scholar

[4] Deepak A., Sharma V., Kumar D. Life cycle assessment of biomedical waste management for reduced environmental impacts. J Cleaner Production 2022:349:131376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131376Search in Google Scholar

[5] Rammelkamp Z., Dirnberger J., Johnson G., Waisbren S. An Audit of All Waste Leaving the Operating Room: Can the Surgical Suite Be More Environmentally Sustainable? World Medical and Health Policy 2021:13(1):126–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/wmh3.397Search in Google Scholar

[6] Kooner S. et al. Waste and recycling among orthopedic subspecialties. Canadian Journal of Surgery 2020:63(3):E278–E283. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018018Search in Google Scholar

[7] Sullivan G. A., Reiter A. J., Hu A., Shah A. N., Dsida R., Raval M. V. Operating Room Recycling: Opportunities to Reduce Carbon Emissions Without Increases in Cost. Journal Pediatric Surgery 2023:58(11):2187–2191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.04.011Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lee R. J., Mears S. C. Reducing and Recycling in Joint Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 2012:27(10):1757–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.020Search in Google Scholar

[9] Romano L., Giuliani A., Muselli M., Lupi E., Vistoli F. Toward Environmentally sustainable surgery: Waste recycling in general surgery operating room. Preliminary cognitive audit. World Journal of Surgery 2024:48(11):2637–2643. https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12237Search in Google Scholar

[10] Zlaugotne B., Pubule J., Gusca J., Kalnins S. N. Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Healthcare Waste and Resource Potential Assessment. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):64–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0006Search in Google Scholar

[11] Mikusinska M. Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Surgical Scrub Suits: The Case of Reusable and Disposable Scrubs used in Swedish Healthcare. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stocholm, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Campion N., Thiel C. L., Woods N. C., Swanzy L., Landis A. E., Bilec M. M. Sustainable healthcare and environmental life-cycle impacts of disposable supplies: A focus on disposable custom packs. Journal of Cleaner Production 2015:94:46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.076Search in Google Scholar

[13] Boberg L., Singh J., Montgomery A., Bentzer P. Environmental impact of single-use, reusable, and mixed trocar systems used for laparoscopic cholecystectomies. PLoS One 2022:17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271601Search in Google Scholar

[14] Cohen E. S. et al. Environmental Impact Assessment of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Head Covers. JAMA Surgery 2023:158(11):1216–1217. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3863Search in Google Scholar

[15] Le N. N. T., Hernandez L. V., Vakil N., Guda N., Patnode C., Jolliet O. Environmental and health outcomes of single-use versus reusable duodenoscopes. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2022:96(6):1002–1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.014Search in Google Scholar

[16] Eckelman M., Mosher M., Gonzalez A., Sherman J. Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2012:114(5):1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824f6959Search in Google Scholar

[17] Vozzola E., Overcash M., Griffing E. An Environmental Analysis of Reusable and Disposable Surgical Gowns. AORN Journal 2020:111(3):315–325. https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.12885Search in Google Scholar

[18] MacNeill A. J., Lillywhite R., Brown C. J. The impact of surgery on global climate: a carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. The Lancet Planet Health 2017:1(9):e360–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6Search in Google Scholar

[19] Campion N., Thiel C. L., DeBlois J., Woods N. C., Landis A. E., Bilec M. M. Life cycle assessment perspectives on delivering an infant in the US. Science of the Total Environment 2012:425:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.006Search in Google Scholar

[20] Ditac G. et al. Carbon footprint of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. EP Europace 2023:25(2):331–340. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac160Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ferrero A., Thouvenin R., Hoogewoud F., Marcireau I., Offret O., Louison P., et al. The carbon footprint of cataract surgery in a French University Hospital. Journal Français d’Ophtalmologie 2021:45(1):57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2021.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[22] Grinberg D. et al. Eco-audit of conventional heart surgery procedures. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 2021:60(6):1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezab320Search in Google Scholar

[23] Latta M., Shaw C., Gale J. The carbon footprint of cataract surgery in Wellington. The New Zealand medical Journal 2021:134:1541.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Namburar S., Pillai M., Varghese G., Thiel C., Robin A. L. Waste generated during glaucoma surgery: A comparison of two global facilities. American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports 2018:12:87–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2018.10.002Search in Google Scholar

[25] Power B., Brady R., Connell P. Analyzing the carbon footprint of an intravitreal injection. Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research 2021:16(3):367–376. https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v16i3.9433Search in Google Scholar

[26] Power N. E., Silberstein J. L., Ghoneim T. P., Guillonneau B., Touijer K. A. Environmental impact of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: An estimate of the carbon dioxide footprint. Journal of Endourology 2012:26(12):1639–1644. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0298Search in Google Scholar

[27] Prakash R., Abid H., Wasim A., Sharma A., Agrawal Y. The Environmental Impact and Sustainability of Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today 2023:24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101254Search in Google Scholar

[28] Rizan C., Lillywhite R., Reed M., Bhutta M. F. The carbon footprint of products used in five common surgical operations: identifying contributing products and processes. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2023:116(6):199–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/01410768231166135Search in Google Scholar

[29] Rougereau G., Chatelain L., Zadegan F., Conso C. Estimation of the carbon footprint of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in France. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research 2024:110(1):103755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103755Search in Google Scholar

[30] Ryan M. T., Malmrose J., Riley C. A., Tolisano A. M. Operating Room Waste Generated Across Otolaryngology Cases. Military Medicine 2023:188(7–8):E1697–E1700. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usab548Search in Google Scholar

[31] Stall N. M., Kagoma Y. K., Bondy J. N., Naudie D. Surgical waste audit of 5 total knee arthroplasties. Canadian Journal of Surgery 2013:56(2):97–102. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.015711Search in Google Scholar

[32] Thiel C. L., Eckelman M., Guido R., Huddleston M., Landis A. E., Sherman J., et al. Environmental impacts of surgical procedures: Life cycle assessment of hysterectomy in the United States. Environmental Science and Technology 2015:49(3):1779–1786. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504719gSearch in Google Scholar

[33] Thiel C. L. et al. Cataract surgery and environmental sustainability: Waste and lifecycle assessment of phacoemulsification at a private healthcare facility. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2017:43(11):1391–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.08.017Search in Google Scholar

[34] Woods D. L., McAndrew T., Nevadunsky N., Hou J. Y., Goldberg G., Kuo D. Y.-S., Isani S. Carbon footprint of robotically-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy: A comparison. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 2015:11(4):406–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1640Search in Google Scholar

[35] Zhang D., Dyer G. S. M., Blazar P., Earp B. E. The Environmental Impact of Open Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. Journal of Hand Surgery 2023:48(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.12.003Search in Google Scholar

[36] Wernet G., Bauer C., Steubing B., Reinhard J., Moreno-Ruiz E., Weidema B. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2016:21(9):1218–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8Search in Google Scholar

[37] UK Government GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs/Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, London, 2023 [Online]. [Accessed 16.08.2024]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/government-conversion-factors-for-company-reportingSearch in Google Scholar

[38] Heijungs R. Ecodesign – Carbon Footprint – Life Cycle Assessment - Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis. A Flexible Framework for a Continuum of Tools. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2010:4(1):42–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10145-010-0016-5Search in Google Scholar

[39] SimaPro: LCA Software 2023, PRé Sustainability [Online]. [Accessed 16.08.2024]. Available: https://simapro.com/Search in Google Scholar

[40] Roletto A., Savio A., Marchi B., Zanoni S. Towards a Greener Radiology: A Comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment Framework for Diagnostic Imaging. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2024:28(1):303–311. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2024-0024Search in Google Scholar