Calculation of Greenhouse Gas Savings: Switch from Electricity Production to Biomethane. Case Study

[1] Statista. Annual CO₂ emissions worldwide 1940-2021 [Online]. [Accessed 19.01.2023]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/276629/global-co2-emissions Search in Google Scholar

[2] European Commission. Global CO2 emissions rebound in 2021 after temporary reduction during COVID19 lockdown [Online]. [Accessed 19.01.2023]. Available: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/jrc-news/global-co2-emissions-rebound-2021-after-temporary-reduction-during-covid19-lockdown-2022-10-14_en Search in Google Scholar

[3] Esposito E., et al. Simultaneous production of biomethane and food grade CO2 from biogas: an industrial case study. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019:12(1):281–289. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8EE02897D Search in Google Scholar

[4] UNFCCC. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. Bonn: UNFCCC, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

[5] European Commission. A European Green Deal [Online]. [Accessed 15.02.2023]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en Search in Google Scholar

[6] International Energy Agency. Global Energy Review: CO₂ Emissions in 2021 Global emissions rebound sharply to highest ever level. Paris: IEA, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Han J., et al. Coal-fired power plant CCUS project comprehensive benefit evaluation and forecasting model study. J. Clean. Prod. 2023:385:135657. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.135657 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Guerrero-Lemus R., Martínez-Duart J. M. Renewable Energies and CO₂: Cost Analysis, Environmental Impacts and Technological Trends. London: Springer, 2013:3. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zhang X., et al. Synthesis and characterization of siloxane functionalized CO2-based polycarbonate. Polymer (Guildf). 2023:266:125623. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.POLYMER.2022.125623 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Wang M., et al. Aldehyde end-capped CO₂-based polycarbonates: a green synthetic platform for site-specific functionalization. Polym. Chem. 2022:13(12):1731–1738. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2PY00129B Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chen Q., et al. Opportunities of integrated systems with CO2 utilization technologies for green fuel & chemicals production in a carbon-constrained society. J. CO₂ Util. 2016:14:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOU.2016.01.004 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Zang G., et al. Performance and cost analysis of liquid fuel production from H2 and CO₂ based on the Fischer-Tropsch process. J. CO₂ Util. 2021:46:101459. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOU.2021.101459 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Abd A. A., et al. Green route for biomethane and hydrogen production via integration of biogas upgrading using pressure swing adsorption and steam-methane reforming process. Renewable Energy 2023:210:64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.041 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Meng F., et al. Effects of hydroxyethyl group on monoethanolamine (MEA) derivatives for biomethane from biogas upgrading. Fuel 2022:325:124874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124874 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Luo L., et al. Environmental and economic analysis of renewable heating and cooling technologies coupled with biomethane utilization: A case study in Chongqing. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments 2023:56:102992. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SETA.2022.102992 Search in Google Scholar

[16] D’Adamo I., Ribichini M., Tsagarakis K. P. Biomethane as an energy resource for achieving sustainable production: Economic assessments and policy implications. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2023:35:13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2022.10.014 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Fubara T., Cecelja F., Yang A. Techno-economic assessment of natural gas displacement potential of biomethane: A case study on domestic energy supply in the UK. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018:131:193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHERD.2017.12.022 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ghiat I., et al. CO₂ utilisation in agricultural greenhouses: A novel ‘plant to plant’ approach driven by bioenergy with carbon capture systems within the energy, water and food Nexus. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021:228:113668. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2020.113668 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Latvijas Gaze. Energy of the future – biomethane [Online]. [Accessed 19.01.2023]. Available: https://lg.lv/en/news/energy-of-the-future-biomethane Search in Google Scholar

[20] International Gas Union. Global Renewable & Low-Carbon Gas Report. London: IGU, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Shirizadeh B., Quirion P. The importance of renewable gas in achieving carbon-neutrality: Insights from an energy system optimization model. Energy 2022:255:124503. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2022.124503 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Keogh N., Corr D., Monaghan R. F. D. Biogenic renewable gas injection into natural gas grids: A review of technical and economic modelling studies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022:168:112818. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2022.112818 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Richards S. J., Al Zaili J. Contribution of encouraging the future use of biomethane to resolving sustainability and energy security challenges: The case of the UK. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2020:55:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESD.2019.12.003 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Hamelin L., Møller H. B., Jørgensen U. Harnessing the full potential of biomethane towards tomorrow’s bioeconomy: A national case study coupling sustainable agricultural intensification, emerging biogas technologies and energy system analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021:138:110506. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2020.110506 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Sangannavar P. A., et al. Biomethane: a sustainable bioenergy source from potential waste effluents. Microbial Resource Technologies for Sustainable Development. Elsevier, 2022:195–212. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Latvijas Gaze. Latvijas Gāze includes initiatives for the development of biomethane production in the environmental policy of the company [Online]. [Accessed 18.01.2023]. Available: https://lg.lv/en/news/latvijas-gaze-includes-initiatives-for-the-development-of-biomethane-production-in-the-environmental-policy-of-the-company Search in Google Scholar

[27] Weinrich S., et al. Value of Batch Tests for Biogas Potential Analysis – Method comparison and challenges of substrate and efficiency evaluation of biogas plants. Paris: IEA Bioenergy, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Liebetrau J., Pfeiffer D., Thran D. Collection of Methods for Biogas. Methods to determine parameters for analysis purposes and Parameters that describe processes in the biogas sector. Leipzig, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Guilayn F., et al. Valorization of digestates from urban or centralized biogas plants: a critical review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technology 2020:19(2):419–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11157-020-09531-3 Search in Google Scholar

[30] IEA Bioenergy. Production of food grade sustainable CO2 from a large biogas facility. Paris: IEA Bioenergy, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Ayub A., et al. Amine-grafted mesoporous silica materials for single-stage biogas upgrading to biomethane. Chem. Eng. J. 2022:445:136497. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2022.136497 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Panwar N. L., Kaushik S. C., Kothari S. Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011:15(3):1513–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSER.2010.11.037 Search in Google Scholar

[33] European Commission. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A resource-efficient Europe – Flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy. Brussels: EC, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[34] van Hoof J., et al. Taking on tomorrow: The rise of circularity in energy, utilities and resources. London: PWC, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

[35] Periyasamy S., et al. Wastewater to biogas recovery. Clean Energy and Resource Recovery. Elsevier, 2022:301–314. Search in Google Scholar

[36] Duran I., Rubiera F., Pevida C. Modeling a biogas upgrading PSA unit with a sustainable activated carbon derived from pine sawdust. Sensitivity analysis on the adsorption of CO2 and CH4 mixtures. Chemical Engineering Journal 2022:428:132564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.132564 Search in Google Scholar

[37] ArcGis. Valsts Zemes Dienesta dati: Pagastu robežas, 2021 (State land service data data: Parish borders, 2021) [Online]. Accessed 19.01.2023]. Available: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b76d9304b3ca467383e462e5dc945d9b Search in Google Scholar

[38] State Environmental Service. Atļauja B kategoijas piesārņojošai darbībai Nr . RE10IB0013 (Permit for category B polluting activity No. RE10IB0013.). Riga: VVD, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

[39] Oehmichen K., et al. Technical principles and methodology for calculating GHG balances of Biomethane Guidance document Content. Leipzig: DBFZ, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[40] European Commission. Renewable Energy – Recast to 2030 (RED II) [Online]. [Accessed 15.01.2023]. Available: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/welcome-jec-website/reference-regulatory-framework/renewable-energy-recast-2030-red-ii_en Search in Google Scholar

[41] Certifications Control Union. SURE - verification scheme – Certifications [Online]. [Accessed 17.01.2023]. Available: https://certifications.controlunion.com/en/certification-programs/certification-programs/sure-verification-scheme Search in Google Scholar

[42] Certifications Control Union. REDcert - Biomass for Energy - Certifications [Online]. [Accessed 17.01.2023]. Available: https://certifications.controlunion.com/en/certification-programs/certification-programs/redcert-biomass-for-energy Search in Google Scholar

[43] Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). Off. J. Eur. Union 2018:L328/82. Search in Google Scholar

[44] REDcert GmbH. Scheme principles for GHG calculation. Scheme principles for GHG calculation consent. Bonn: REDCert, 2021. Search in Google Scholar

[45] European Commission. Voluntary Schemes [Online]. [Accessed 18.02.2023]. Available: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/renewable-energy/bioenergy/voluntary-schemes_en Search in Google Scholar

[46] Biograce. The BioGrace-II GHG calculation tool for electricity, heating and cooling. Maryland: Biograce, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[47] Communication from the Commission on the practical implementation of the EU biofuels and bioliquids sustainability scheme and on counting rules for biofuels. Off. J. Eur. Union 2010:C160/53. Search in Google Scholar

[48] ISCC. ISCC 201-3 Guidance for the Certification of Biogas and Biomethane. Koln: ISCC, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[49] REDcert. REDcert Version 07 System principles for interfaces and suppliers of waste and residual materials. Bonn: REDCert, 2015. Search in Google Scholar