This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bosello F., et al. Chapter 5 - Economy-Wide Impacts of Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies Across European Regions. Adapting to Climate Change in Europe 2018:245–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-849887-3.00005-8Search in Google Scholar
Edwards W., Duffy P. Farm Management. Encyclopedia of Agriculture and Food Systems 2014:100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52512-3.00111-XSearch in Google Scholar
Saxena R., et al. The role of artificial intelligence strategies to mitigate abiotic stress and climate change in crop production. Visualisation Techniques for Climate Change with Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence 2023:273–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99714-0.00006-6Search in Google Scholar
Kiran T. M., et al. Carbon sequestration potential of sustainable agricultural practices to mitigate climate change in Indian agriculture: A meta-analysis. Sustainable Production and Consumption 2023:35:697–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.12.015Search in Google Scholar
Ibrahim M. A., Johansson M. Combating climate change – What, where and how to implement adaptive measures in the agriculture sector of Öland, Sweden, considering the constraints of carrying capacities and risk of maladaptation. Land Use Policy 2022:122:106358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106358Search in Google Scholar
Asian Development Bank Institute. Climate Change in Asian and the Pacific 2012.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. Agriculture and rural development [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2023] Available: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-glance_enSearch in Google Scholar
Pe’er G., Lakner S. The EU’s Common Agricultural Policy Could Be Spent Much More Efficiently to Address Challenges for Farmer, Climate, and Biodiversity. One Earth 2020:3(2):173–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.08.004Search in Google Scholar
Nagel N. O., et al. Impacts of green deal policies on the Nordic power market. Utilities Policy 2023:80:101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2022.101475Search in Google Scholar
Boix-Fayos C., de Vente J. Challenges and potential pathways towards sustainable agriculture within the European Green Deal. Agricultural Systems 2023:207:103634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103634Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. Technical Guidance Handbook: Setting up and implementing results-based carbon farming mechanisms in the EU (2021). Brussels: EC, 2021.Search in Google Scholar
Gancone A., Pubule J., Blumberga D. Valorization methodology for agriculture sector climate change mitigation measures. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):944–954. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0071Search in Google Scholar
Bumbiere K., et al. Development and Assessment of Carbon Farming Solutions. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):898–916. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-0068Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. Rural development – long-term vision for rural areas [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2023] Available: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12525-Rural-development-long-term-vision-for-rural-areas_enSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. Soil strategy for 2030 [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2023]. Available: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/soil-and-land/soil-strategy_enSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. Biodiversity strategy for 2030 [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2023]. Available: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/biodiversity-strategy-2030_enSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. Key policy objectives of the CAP 2023-27 [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2023] Available: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-2023-27/key-policy-objectives-cap-2023-27_enSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. CAP Specific Objective: Agriculture and Climate Mitigation. Luxemburg: EC, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
European Comission, IMPLEMENTING DECISION OF THE COMMISSION (11.11.2022) which approves the Latvian 2023-2027 of the CAP strategic plan regarding Union support financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund and European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development CCI: 2023LV06AFSP001 [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2023]. Available: https://www.zm.gov.lv/lv/media/5361/download?attachment (in Latvian).Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. The Common Agricultural Policy: 2023-27 [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2023]. Available: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-2023-27_enSearch in Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Kopejais Lauksaimniecibas politikas strategiskais plans 2023.-2027. gadam (Latvia’s Common Agricultural Policy Strategic Plan for 2023-2027) [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2023]. Available: https://www.zm.gov.lv/lv/latvijas-kopejas-lauksaimniecibas-politikas-strategiskais-plans-2023-2027gadam (in Latvian)Search in Google Scholar
Balode L., et al. How to Assess Policy Impact in National Energy and Climate Plans. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):405–421. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0030Search in Google Scholar
ODYSEE-MURE. Successful Energy Efficiency Policies Tool [Online]. [Accessed 25.02.2023]. Available: https://www.measures.odyssee-mure.eu/successful-efficiency-measures-tool.html#/methodologySearch in Google Scholar
Warren P. Demand-Side Management Policy: Mechanisms for Success and Failure. London: UCL Energy Institute, 2015.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. Better regulation Toolbox. 2017.[Online]. [Accessed 25.03.2023] Available: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/better-regulation/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox_enSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission. Technical Handbook on the Monitoring and Evaluation Framework of the Common Agricultural Policy 2014-2020. Brussels: EC, 2017.Search in Google Scholar
OECD. Towards a set of indicators for tracking progress on policy coherenceforsustainable development (PCSD) at the national level. Paris: OECD, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
Bathaei A., Streimikiene D. A Systematic Review of Agricultural Sustainability Indicators. Agriculture 2023:13(2):241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020241Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. CAP Specific Objective: Health, Food & Antimicrobial Resistance. Luxemburg: EC, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. CAP Specific Objective: Efficient Soil Management. Luxemburg: EC, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. CAP Specific Objective: Ensuring Viable Farm Income. Luxemburg: EC, 2018.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. CAP Specific Objective: Increasing Competitiveness. Luxemburg: EC, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. CAP Specific Objective: Biodiversity and Farmed Landscapes. Luxemburg: EC, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture Republic of Latvia. Horizontal target. Modernize agriculture and rural sectors, in agriculture and rural areas by promoting and sharing knowledge, innovation and digitalisation, and encourage farmers to learn them by improving access for this purpose for research, innovation, knowledge exchange and training. Situation analysis. [Online]. [Accessed 10.03.2023]. Available:https://www.zm.gov.lv/lv/media/5481/download?attachment (in Latvian).Search in Google Scholar
European Parliament. Small farms’ role in the EU food system. Brussels: EP, 2022.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. CAP Specific Objective: Farmer Position in Value Chains. Luxemburg: EC, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. CAP Specific Objective: Structural Change and Generational Renewal. Luxemburg: EC, 2019.Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. CAP Specific Objective: Jobs and Growth in Rural Areas. Luxemburg: EC, 2019Search in Google Scholar
Kiryluk-Dryjska E., Więckowska B., Smolińska K. Winners and Losers of the CAP’srural Development Policy in Poland. Agriculture 2022:12(5):676. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050676Search in Google Scholar
Manevska-Tasevska G.,et al. Exploring the regional efficiency of the Swedish agricultural sector during the CAP reforms–multi-directional efficiency analysis approach. Land Use Policy2021:100:104897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104897Search in Google Scholar
Ciliberti S., Frascarelli A. The role of CAP in enhancing farm in comes: the redistributive effect of direct payments in Italy. Proceedings of the 147thSeminar European Association of Agricultural Economists 2015. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.212244Search in Google Scholar