CO₂ Storage in Logging Residue Products with Analysis of Energy Production Scenarios

[1] Montanari C., Olsén P., Berglund L. A. Sustainable Wood Nanotechnologies for Wood Composites Processed by In-Situ Polymerization. Front. Chem. 2021:9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.68288310.3389/fchem.2021.682883828129234277566 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Blumberga D., et al. Forest biomass – new products and technologies. Riga: Riga Technical University, Institute of Energy Systems and Environment, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Terjanika V., Pubule J. Barriers and Driving Factors for Sustainable Development of CO₂ Valorisation. Sustainability 2022:14(9):5054. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1409505410.3390/su14095054 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Terjanika V., et al. Analysis of CO₂ Valorisation Options for Regional Development. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):243–253. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0017.10.2478/rtuect-2021-0017 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Terjanika V., Blumberga D., Pubule J. Regional Development Scenarios and Model Boundaries for CCU in Energy Sector in Latvia. Proceedings of the IEEE 62^nd International Scientific Conference on Power and Electrical Engineering of Riga Technical University, RTUCON 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/RTUCON53541.2021.9711727.10.1109/RTUCON53541.2021.9711727 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Singh T., et al. Emerging technologies for the development of wood products towards extended carbon storage and CO₂ capture. Carbon Capture Science & Technology 2022:4:100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccst.2022.10005710.1016/j.ccst.2022.100057 Search in Google Scholar

[7] Xu X., et al. Bamboo construction materials: Carbon storage and potential to reduce associated CO₂ emissions. Science of the Total Environment 2022:814:152697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.15269710.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.15269734974007 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Tripathi N., et al. Biomass waste utilisation in low-carbon products: harnessing a significant potential resource. Npj Climate and Atmospheric Science 2019:2:35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0093-510.1038/s41612-019-0093-5 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Kazulis V., et al. Carbon storage in wood products. Energy Procedia 2017:128:558–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.00910.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.009 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Raunkjaer Stubdrup K., et al. Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Wood-based Panels. Seville: JRC, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Veitmans K., Grinfelds U. Wood fibre insulation material. Research for Rural Development 2016:2:91–98. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Vamza I., et al. Bioresource utilization index – A way to quantify and compare resource efficiency in production. Journal of Cleaner Production 2021:320:128791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12879110.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128791 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Gruduls K., et al. 2013. Characteristics of wood chips from logging residues and quality influencing factors. Research for Rural Development 2013:2:49–54. Search in Google Scholar

[14] FAO, ITTO, United Nations. Forest product conversion factors. Rome: FAO, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Dieffenbacher GmbH. Fibre Insulation Board lines [Online]. [Accessed 20.04.2022]. Available: https://www.environmental-expert.com/products/fibre-insulation-board-lines-190613 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Tellnes L. G. F., et al. Comparative assessment for biogenic carbon accounting methods in carbon footprint of products: A review study for construction materials based on forest products. ISEF – Italian Society of Silviculture and Forest Ecology 2017:10(5):815–823. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2386-01010.3832/ifor2386-010 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Pubule J., et al. Analysis of the environmental impact assessment of power energy projects in Latvia. Management of Environmental Quality 2012:23(2):190–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831211204930.10.1108/14777831211204930 Search in Google Scholar

[18] BRE Ltd. BRE Global Product Category Rules for Type III environmental product declaration of construction products to EN 15804:2012+A1:2013. Watford: BRE Group, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Balkan Green Energy News. 5 MWe biomass cogeneration plant officially opened in the city of Slatina. 2019 [Online]. [Accessed 20.04.2022]. Available: https://balkangreenenergynews.com/5-mwe-biomass-cogeneration-plant-officially-opened-in-the-city-of-slatina/ Search in Google Scholar

[20] U.S. Department of Energy. Combined Heat and Power Technology Fact Sheet Series: Gas turbines. Washington: DoE, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Danish Energy Agency. Technology Data for Energy Plants for Electricity and District Heating generation. Copenhagen: DEA, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Abbas T., Issa M., Ilinca A. Biomass Cogeneration Technologies: A Review. Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems 2020:10(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2020.10100110.4236/jsbs.2020.101001 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Tsiropoulos I., Tarvydas D., Zucker A. Cost development of low carbon energy technologies. Luxembourg: Publication Office of European Union, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[24] Zalamane D. Pieaug koksnes šķeldas cena, apkure ar šķeldu ir 5 reizes lētāka nekā ar dabasgāzi (The price of wood chips is rising, heating with wood chips is 5 times cheaper than with natural gas.). 2022 [Online]. [Accessed 20.04.2022]. Available: https://lr1.lsm.lv/lv/raksts/eiro-fokusa/pieaug-koksnes-skeldas-cena-apkure-ar-skeldu-ir-5-reizes-letaka-.a155970/ (in Latvian) Search in Google Scholar

[25] ‘Latvijas gaze’ brīdina par dabasgāzes biržas cenas trīskāršu pieaugumu aprīlī (‘Latvian gas’ warns of a threefold increase in natural gas exchange prices in April). 2022 [Online]. [Accessed 20.04.2022] Available: https://www.lsm.lv/raksts/zinas/ekonomika/latvijas-gaze-bridina-par-dabasgazes-birzas-cenas-triskarsu-pieaugumuaprili.a446800/ (in Latvian) Search in Google Scholar

[26] Darrow K., et al. Catalogue of CHP technologies. Boston: EPA, ICF International, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Cabinet of Ministers. Methodology for calculating greenhouse gas emissions. Latvijas Vestnesis 2018:18. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Ishizaka A., Nemery P. Multi-criteria Decision Analysis: Methods and Software. USA: Wiley, 2013.10.1002/9781118644898 Search in Google Scholar

[29] American Center for Life Cycle Assessment. ACLCA Guidance to Calculating Non-LCIA Inventory Metrics in Accordance with ISO 21930:2017. Washington: ACLCA, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[30] European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability. International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook. General guide for Life Cycle Assessment. Detailed guidance. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

[31] British Standards Institution. 2011. PAS 2050:2011: Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. Search in Google Scholar