[
[1] European Union. 2030 Energy and Climate framework. Conclusions, EUCO 169/14. Brussels: EU, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] European Commission. Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 (European Climate Law). Brussels: EC, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Zlaugotne B., GHG Performance Evaluation in Green Deal Context. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2020:24(1):431–441. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-002610.2478/rtuect-2020-0026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] European Commission. A new Circular Economy Action PlanFor a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Brussels: EC, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Locmelis K., et al. Industrial Energy Efficiency Towards Green Deal Transition. Case of Latvia. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2021:25(1):42–57. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-000410.2478/rtuect-2021-0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Vamza I., et al. Life Cycle Assessment of Reprocessed Cross Laminated Timber in Latvia. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2021:25(1):58–70. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-000510.2478/rtuect-2021-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Pittau F., et al. Fast-growing bio-based materials as an opportunity for storing carbon in exterior walls. Build. Environ. 2018:129:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.00610.1016/j.buildenv.2017.12.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Shang Y., Tariku F. Hempcrete building performance in mild and cold climates: Integrated analysis of carbon footprint, energy, and indoor thermal and moisture buffering. Build. Environ. 2021:206:108377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.10837710.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108377
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Arehart J. H., Nelson W. S., Srubar W. V.,On the theoretical carbon storage and carbon sequestration potential of hempcrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2020:266:121846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12184610.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121846
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] Arrigoni A., et al. Life cycle assessment of natural building materials: the role of carbonation, mixture components and transport in the environmental impacts of hempcrete blocks. J. Clean. Prod. 2017:149:1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.16110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.161
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Birjukovs M., et al. Combined in situ and in silico validation of a material model for hempcrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022:321:126051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12605110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126051
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Pretot S., Collet F., Garnier C. Life cycle assessment of a hemp concrete wall: Impact of thickness and coating. Build. Environ. 2014:72:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.01010.1016/j.buildenv.2013.11.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Di Capua S. E., et al. Evaluation of the Environmental Sustainability of Hemp as a Building Material, through Life Cycle Assessment. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2021:25(1):1215–1228.10.2478/rtuect-2021-0092
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Lim S., et al. Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Autom. Constr. 2012:21(1):262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.01010.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Weng Y., et al. Comparative economic, environmental and productivity assessment of a concrete bathroom unit fabricated through 3D printing and a precast approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2020:261:121245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12124510.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121245
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Ngo T. D., et al. Additive manufacturing ( 3D printing ): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. Part B 2018:143:17–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Das A. K., et al. A review on wood powders in 3D printing: processes, properties and potential applications. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021:15:241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.11010.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.110
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Sinka M., et al. Fast setting binders for application in 3d printing of bio-based building materials. Sustain. 2020:12(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su1221883810.3390/su12218838
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Sinka M., et al. Comparative life cycle assessment of magnesium binders as an alternative for hemp concrete. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018:133(C):288–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.02410.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Sahmenko G., et al. Sustainable Wall Solutions Using Foam Concrete and Hemp Composites. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2021:25(1):917–930. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-006910.2478/rtuect-2021-0069
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Zimele Z., et al. Life cycle assessment for masonry exterior wall assemblies made of traditional building materials. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2019:660(1):012042.10.1088/1757-899X/660/1/012042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] Heras Murcia D., Genedy M., Reda Taha M. M. Examining the significance of infill printing pattern on the anisotropy of 3D printed concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020:262:120559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12055910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120559
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] Reddy B. V. V., Mani M., Walker P. Earthen dwellings and structures. Current status in their adoption. Springer, 2019.10.1007/978-981-13-5883-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[24] Ip K., Miller A. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of hemp–lime wall constructions in the UK. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012:69:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.00110.1016/j.resconrec.2012.09.001
]Search in Google Scholar
