A Perspective on a Two-stent Approach in Bifurcation Cases

1. Khan MA, Hashim MJ, Mustafa H, Baniyas MY, Al Suwaidi SKBM, AlKatheeri R, et al. Global Epidemiology of Ischemic Heart Disease: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9349. Khan MA Hashim MJ Mustafa H Baniyas MY Al Suwaidi SKBM AlKatheeri R . Global Epidemiology of Ischemic Heart Disease: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study . Cureus . 2020 ; 12 ( 7 ): e9349 . Search in Google Scholar

2. Chen X, Li X, Zhang JJ, Han Y, Kan J, Chen L, et al. 3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush with Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(19):1927–37. Chen X Li X Zhang JJ Han Y Kan J Chen L . 3-Year Outcomes of the DKCRUSH-V Trial Comparing DK Crush with Provisional Stenting for Left Main Bifurcation Lesions . JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 ; 12 ( 19 ): 1927 – 37 . Search in Google Scholar

3. Lunardi M, Louvard Y, Lefèvre T, Stankovic G, Burzotta F, Kassab GS, et al. Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(1):63–88. Lunardi M Louvard Y Lefèvre T Stankovic G Burzotta F Kassab GS . Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations . J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 ; 80 ( 1 ): 63 – 88 . Search in Google Scholar

4. Pan M, Ojeda S. Medina classification since its description in 2005. Rev Esp Cardiol Engl Ed. 2023;76(3):146–9. Pan M Ojeda S. Medina classification since its description in 2005 . Rev Esp Cardiol Engl Ed. 2023 ; 76 ( 3 ): 146 – 9 . Search in Google Scholar

5. Park TK, Park YH, Song YB, Oh JH, Chun WJ, Kang GH, et al. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of True and Non-True Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification – Results From the COBIS (COronary BIfurcation Stent) II Registry. Circ J. 2015;79(9):1954–62. Park TK Park YH Song YB Oh JH Chun WJ Kang GH . Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of True and Non-True Bifurcation Lesions According to Medina Classification – Results From the COBIS (COronary BIfurcation Stent) II Registry . Circ J. 2015 ; 79 ( 9 ): 1954 – 62 . Search in Google Scholar

6. Chen SL, Sheiban I, Xu B, Jepson N, Paiboon C, Zhang JJ, et al. Impact of the Complexity of Bifurcation Lesions Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents: The DEFINITION Study (Definitions and impact of complEx biFurcation lesIons on clinical outcomes after percutaNeous coronary IntervenTIOn using drug-eluting steNts). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(11):1266–76. Chen SL Sheiban I Xu B Jepson N Paiboon C Zhang JJ . Impact of the Complexity of Bifurcation Lesions Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents: The DEFINITION Study (Definitions and impact of complEx biFurcation lesIons on clinical outcomes after percutaNeous coronary IntervenTIOn using drug-eluting steNts) . JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 ; 7 ( 11 ): 1266 – 76 . Search in Google Scholar

7. Colombo A, Bramucci E, Saccà S, Violini R, Lettieri C, Zanini R, et al. Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations. Circulation. 2009;119(1):71–8. Colombo A Bramucci E Saccà S Violini R Lettieri C Zanini R . Randomized Study of the Crush Technique Versus Provisional Side-Branch Stenting in True Coronary Bifurcations . Circulation. 2009 ; 119 ( 1 ): 71 – 8 . Search in Google Scholar

8. Erglis A, Kumsars I, Niemelä M, Kervinen K, Maeng M, Lassen JF, et al. Randomized Comparison of Coronary Bifurcation Stenting With the Crush Versus the Culotte Technique Using Sirolimus Eluting Stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2(1):27–34. Erglis A Kumsars I Niemelä M Kervinen K Maeng M Lassen JF . Randomized Comparison of Coronary Bifurcation Stenting With the Crush Versus the Culotte Technique Using Sirolimus Eluting Stents . Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 ; 2 ( 1 ): 27 – 34 . Search in Google Scholar

9. Chen SL, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Chen YD, Patel T, Kawajiri K, et al. Study comparing the double kissing (DK) crush with classical crush for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: the DKCRUSH-1 Bifurcation Study with drug-eluting stents. Eur J Clin Invest. 2008;38(6):361–71. Chen SL Zhang JJ Ye F Chen YD Patel T Kawajiri K . Study comparing the double kissing (DK) crush with classical crush for the treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions: the DKCRUSH-1 Bifurcation Study with drug-eluting stents . Eur J Clin Invest. 2008 ; 38 ( 6 ): 361 – 71 . Search in Google Scholar

10. Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, Curzen NP, Clayton TC, Oldroyd KG, et al. Randomized Trial of Simple Versus Complex Drug-Eluting Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions. Circulation. 2010;121(10):1235–43. Hildick-Smith D de Belder AJ Cooter N Curzen NP Clayton TC Oldroyd KG . Randomized Trial of Simple Versus Complex Drug-Eluting Stenting for Bifurcation Lesions . Circulation. 2010 ; 121 ( 10 ): 1235 – 43 . Search in Google Scholar

11. Chen SL, Santoso T, Zhang JJ, Ye F, Xu YW, Fu Q, et al. A Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Double Kissing Crush With Provisional Stenting for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(8):914–20. Chen SL Santoso T Zhang JJ Ye F Xu YW Fu Q . A Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Double Kissing Crush With Provisional Stenting for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions . J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 ; 57 ( 8 ): 914 – 20 . Search in Google Scholar

12. Arunothayaraj S, Behan M, Lefèvre T, Lassen JF, Chieffo A, Stankovic G, et al. Stepwise provisional versus systematic culotte for stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised EBC TWO Trial. EuroIntervention. 2023;19(4): https://eurointervention.pcronline.com/article/stepwise-provisional-versus-systematic-culotte-for-stenting-of-true-coronary-bifurcation-lesions-five-year-follow-up-of-the-multicentre-randomised-ebc-two-trial. Cited 2023 Nov 12. Arunothayaraj S Behan M Lefèvre T Lassen JF Chieffo A Stankovic G . Stepwise provisional versus systematic culotte for stenting of true coronary bifurcation lesions: five-year follow-up of the multicentre randomised EBC TWO Trial . EuroIntervention. 2023 ; 19 ( 4 ): https://eurointervention.pcronline.com/article/stepwise-provisional-versus-systematic-culotte-for-stenting-of-true-coronary-bifurcation-lesions-five-year-follow-up-of-the-multicentre-randomised-ebc-two-trial . Cited 2023 Nov 12. Search in Google Scholar

13. Hildick-Smith D, Egred M, Banning A, Brunel P, Ferenc M, Hovasse T, et al. The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN). Eur Heart J. 2021;42(37):3829–39. Hildick-Smith D Egred M Banning A Brunel P Ferenc M Hovasse T . The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN) . Eur Heart J. 2021 ; 42 ( 37 ): 3829 – 39 . Search in Google Scholar

14. Dou K, Zhang D, Pan H, Guo N, Li L, Li Y, et al. Active SB-P Versus Conventional Approach to the Protection of High-Risk Side Branches: The CIT-RESOLVE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(9):1112–22. Dou K Zhang D Pan H Guo N Li L Li Y . Active SB-P Versus Conventional Approach to the Protection of High-Risk Side Branches: The CIT-RESOLVE Trial . JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 ; 13 ( 9 ): 1112 – 22 . Search in Google Scholar

15. Niemelä M, Kervinen K, Erglis A, Holm NR, Maeng M, Christiansen EH, et al. Randomized comparison of final kissing balloon dilatation versus no final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with main vessel stenting: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III. Circulation. 2011;123(1):79–86. Niemelä M Kervinen K Erglis A Holm NR Maeng M Christiansen EH . Randomized comparison of final kissing balloon dilatation versus no final kissing balloon dilatation in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions treated with main vessel stenting: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study III . Circulation. 2011 ; 123 ( 1 ): 79 – 86 . Search in Google Scholar

16. Dou K, Zhang D, Xu B, Yang Y, Yin D, Qiao S, et al. An angiographic tool for risk prediction of side branch occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention: the RESOLVE score system (Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(1 Pt A):39–46. Dou K Zhang D Xu B Yang Y Yin D Qiao S . An angiographic tool for risk prediction of side branch occlusion in coronary bifurcation intervention: the RESOLVE score system (Risk prEdiction of Side branch OccLusion in coronary bifurcation interVEntion) . JACC Cardiovasc Interv . 2015 ; 8 ( 1 Pt A ): 39 – 46 . Search in Google Scholar

17. Sheiban I, Figini F, Gasparetto V, D’Ascenzo F, Moretti C, Leonardo F. Side Branch is the Main Determinant Factor of Bifurcation Lesion Complexity: Critical Review with a Proposal Based on Single-centre Experience. Heart Int. 2021;15(2):67–72. Sheiban I Figini F Gasparetto V D’Ascenzo F Moretti C Leonardo F. Side Branch is the Main Determinant Factor of Bifurcation Lesion Complexity: Critical Review with a Proposal Based on Single-centre Experience . Heart Int. 2021 ; 15 ( 2 ): 67 – 72 . Search in Google Scholar

18. Peighambari M, Sanati H, Hadjikarimi M, Zahedmehr A, Shakerian F, Firouzi A, et al. The Effects of Side Branch Predilation During Provisional Stenting of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2016;5(2):e31378. Peighambari M Sanati H Hadjikarimi M Zahedmehr A Shakerian F Firouzi A . The Effects of Side Branch Predilation During Provisional Stenting of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial . Res Cardiovasc Med. 2016 ; 5 ( 2 ): e31378 . Search in Google Scholar