Using Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case of Universities

ABOTT, M., DOUCOULIAGOS, C. (2003). The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Economics of Education Review. 22, pp. 89-97. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00068-110.1016/S0272-7757(01)00068-1Search in Google Scholar

ABZUG, R., WEBB, N. J. (1999). Relationships Between Nonprofit and For-Profit Organizations: A Stakeholder Perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28 (4), pp. 416-431.10.1177/0899764099284003Search in Google Scholar

AHN, T., CHARNES, A., COOPER, W.W. (1988). Some Statistical and DEA Evaluations of Relative Efficiencies of Public and Private Institutions of Higher Education, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 6, pp. 259-269.Search in Google Scholar

ALLEN, R., TOMASSI, D. (2001). Managing public expenditure. Paris : OECD.Search in Google Scholar

BALSER, D., MCCLUSKY, J. (2005). Managing Stakeholder Relationships and Nonprofit Organization Effectiveness. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 15(3), pp. 295-315. DOI: 10.1002/nml.7010.1002/nml.70Search in Google Scholar

BESSENT, A.M., BESSENT E.W., CHARNES A., COOPER W.W., THOROGOOD, N.C. (1983). Evaluation of Educational Program Proposals by Means of DEA, Educational Administration Quarterly. 19, pp. 82-107.Search in Google Scholar

BROWN, E., SLIWINSKI, A. (2006). Nonprofit Organizations and the Market. In POWELL, W.W., STEINBERG, R. (eds.) The Nonprofit sector. A Research Handbook. 2nd. ed. New Haven and London : Yale Univerzity Press.Search in Google Scholar

COHN, E., RHINE, S. L.W., SANTOS, M.C (1989). Institutions of Higher Education as Multi-Product Firms: Economies of Scale and Scope,” Review of Economics and Statistics. 71, pp. 275-290.Search in Google Scholar

DALTON, T. C., FITZPATRICK, L. C. (1985). Productivity measurement and the public organization. Review of Policy Research. 4, pp. 519-531. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1985.tb00252.x DE GROOT, H., MCMAHON, W.W. , VOLKWEIN, J.F. (1991). The Cost Structure of American Research Universities. Review of Economics and Statistics. 73, pp. 424-431.Search in Google Scholar

DUNDAR, H., LEWIS, D.R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education. 39(6), pp. 607-631.10.1023/A:1018705823763Search in Google Scholar

DENISTON, O. L., ROSENSTOCK, I. M., WELCH, W., GETTING, V. A. (1968). Evaluation of Program Effectiveness. Public Health Reports. 83(4), pp. 323-335. DOI: 10.2307/459327910.2307/4593279Search in Google Scholar

FLEGG, A. T; ALLEN D.O; FIELD K., THURLOW, T.W. (2003). Measuring the Efficiency and Productivity of British Universities: An Application of DEA and the Malmquist Approach. University of the West of England, Department of Economics, series Discussion Papers n. 304.Search in Google Scholar

GARCIA-ARACIL, A., PALOMARES-MONTERO, D. (2008). Evaluation of Spanish Universities: Efficiency, Technology and Productivity Change. Paper presented in the Prime-Latin America Conference at Mexico City, September 24-26th 2008.Search in Google Scholar

JOHNES, G. (1992). Performance Indicators in Higher Education: A Survey of Recent Work, Oxford Review of Economic Policy. Vol. 8, pp. 19-34. DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/8.2.1910.1093/oxrep/8.2.19Search in Google Scholar

JOHNES, J., JOHNES, G. (1995) Research Funding and Performance in UK University Departments of Economics: A Frontier Analysis. The Economics of Education Review. 14, pp. 301-14. DOI: 10.1016/0272-7757(95)00008-810.1016/0272-7757(95)00008-8Search in Google Scholar

KEMPKES, G., POHL, C. (2006). The Efficiency of German Universities - Some Evidence form Non-parametric and Parametric Methods. Ifo Working Paper No. 36.Search in Google Scholar

MANKIW N. G. (2007). Principles of economics. Mason : Thomson Higher Education.Search in Google Scholar

MCMILLAN, M., DATTA, D. (1998). The Relative Efficiencies of Canadian Universities: A DEA Perspective. Canadian Public Policy. University of Toronto Press, 24(4), pp. 485-511.10.2307/3552021Search in Google Scholar

MUSGRAVE, R. MUSGRAVE, B. (1984). Public finance in theory and practice. 4. ed. New York : McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

PEARCE, D. (ed.) (1992). Macmillan dictionary of modern economics. 4th ed. London ; Basingstoke : Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-22136-3Search in Google Scholar

ROBINSON, M. (2002). Output-Purchase Funding and Budgeting Systems in the Public Sector. Public Budgeting & Systems. 22, pp. 17-3310.1111/1540-5850.00087Search in Google Scholar

SAMUELSON P., NORDHAUS, W. (1992). Economics. 14th ed. New York : McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

SARAFOGLOU, N., HAYNES, K.E. (1996). University Productivity in Sweden: A Demonstration and Explanatory Analysis for Economics and Business Programs, Annals of Regional Science. 30, pp. 285-304. DOI: 10.1007/BF0158052310.1007/BF01580523Search in Google Scholar

SINUANY-STERN, Z., MEHREZ, A., BARBOY, A. (1994). Academic Departments’ Efficiency via DEA, Computers and Operations Research. 21, pp. 543-56. DOI: 10.1016/0305-0548(94)90103-110.1016/0305-0548(94)90103-1Search in Google Scholar

STEINBERG, R. (2006). Economic Theories of Nonprofit Organizations. In POWELL, W.W., STEINBERG, R. (eds.) The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook. New Haven & London : Yale University Press. STIGLITZ, J. (2000). Economics of the public sector. 3rd ed. New York : W. W. Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

TOMKINS, C., GREEN, R. (1988). An Experiment in the Use of Data Envelopment Analysis for Evaluating the Efficiency of UK University Departments of Accounting. Financial Accountability and Management. 4, pp. 147-164. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0408.1988.tb00066.x 10.1111/j.1468-0408.1988.tb00066.xSearch in Google Scholar