[Biemans, H. J., & Simons, P. R. J. (1996). CONTACT-2: A computer-assisted instructional strategy for promoting conceptual change. Instructional Science, 24(2), 157-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0012048710.1007/BF00120487]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Campbell, K. S., Mothersbaugh, D. L., Brammer, C., & Taylor, T. (2001). Peer versus self-assessment of oral business presentation performance. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(3), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/10805699010640030310.1177/108056990106400303]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chan, V. (2011). Teaching oral communication in undergraduate science: Are we doing enough and doing it right? Journal Of Learning Design, 4(3), 71-79. doi:10.5204/jld.v4i3.8210.5204/jld.v4i3.82]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Chollet, M., Wörtwein, T., Morency, L. P., Shapiro, A., & Scherer, S. (2015). Exploring feedback strategies to improve public speaking: an interactive virtual audience framework. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (pp. 1143-1154). ACM. doi: 10.1145/2750858.280606010.1145/2750858.2806060]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Coller, B. D., & Shernoff, D. J. (2009). Video game-based education in mechanical engineering: a look at student engagement. International of Engineering Education, 25, 308–317. doi: 0949-149X/91]Search in Google Scholar
[De Grez, L. (2009). Optimizing the instructional environment to learn presentation skills. Dissertation: Universiteit Gent.]Search in Google Scholar
[DeLucenay, A. J., Conn, K. M., & Corigliano, A. (2017). An evaluation of the impact of immediate compared to delayed feedback on the development of counselling skills in pharmacy students. Pharmacy Education, 17(1), 322-328. http://pharmacyeducation.co.uk/pharmacyeducation/article/viewFile/480/447]Search in Google Scholar
[Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. J. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. The Psychological Record, 54(2), 207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0339547110.1007/BF03395471]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hawkins, D. G. (1995). Virtual reality and passive simulators: the future of fun. In F. Biocca & M. R. Levy (Ed.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 159–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[King, P., Young, M., & Behnke, R. (2000). Public speaking performance improvement as a function of information processing in immediate and delayed feedback interventions. Communication Education, 49(4), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452000937922410.1080/03634520009379224]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.03310.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Metcalfe, J., Kornell, N., & Finn, B. (2009). Delayed versus immediate feedback in children’s and adults’ vocabulary learning. Memory & Cognition, 37(8), 1077-1087. doi:10.3758/MC.37.8.107710.3758/MC.37.8.1077]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitrovic, A., Gostomski, P., Herritsch, A., & Dimitrova, V. (2017). Improving presentation skills of first-year engineering students using active video watching. In 28th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, 809]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohamed, A. A., Asmawi, A., Hamid, M. R. A., & Mustafa, Z. B. (2015). Descriptive analysis of context evaluation instrument for technical oral presentation skills evaluation: A case study in English technical communication course. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1643(1), 536-540.10.1063/1.4907491]Search in Google Scholar
[Pertaub, D-P., Slater, M., & Barker, C. (2001). An experiment on fear of public speaking in virtual reality. In J. D. Westwood, H M. Hoffman, G. T. Mogel & D. Stredney (Eds.) Medicine meets virtual reality (pp. 372-378). IOS Press. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mel_Slater/publication/12017692_An_experiment_on_fear_of_public_speaking_in_virtual_reality/links/00b495219d7573d4fa000000.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, C. M., & Sodano, T. M. (2011). Integrating lecture capture as a teaching strategy to improve student presentation skills through self-assessment. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(3), 151-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/146978741141508210.1177/1469787411415082]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tanveer, M. I., Lin, E., & Hoque, M. E. (2015). Rhema: A real-time in-situ intelligent interface to help people with public speaking. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 286-295). ACM. doi: 10.1145/2678025.270138610.1145/2678025.2701386]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2015). Towards a set of design principles for developing oral presentation competence: A synthesis of research in higher education. Educational Research Review, 14, 62-80. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.00210.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2017a). The impact of the feedback source on developing oral presentation competence. Studies in Higher Education, 42(9), 1671-1685. doi:10.1080/03075079.2015.111706410.1080/03075079.2015.1117064]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2017b). Fostering oral presentation performance: does the quality of feedback differ when provided by the teacher, peers or peers guided by tutor? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 953-966. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2016.121298410.1080/02602938.2016.1212984]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Ginkel, S., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., Noroozi, O., Roozen, M., Bos, T., Van Tilborg, R., Van Halteren, M., & Mulder, M. (2019). Fostering oral presentation competence through a virtual reality-based task for delivering feedback. Computers & Education, 134, 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.00610.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.006]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Van Ginkel, S., Laurentzen, R., Mulder, M., Mononen, A., Kyttä, J., & Kortelainen, M. J. (2017). Assessing oral presentation performance: designing a rubric and testing its validity with an expert group. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(3), 474-486. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2016-001210.1108/JARHE-02-2016-0012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar