Looking through the imaging perspective: the importance of imaging necrosis in glioma diagnosis and prognostic prediction – single centre experience
, , , , , , , , et
21 févr. 2024
À propos de cet article
Catégorie d'article: Research Article
Publié en ligne: 21 févr. 2024
Pages: 23 - 32
Reçu: 19 sept. 2023
Accepté: 01 déc. 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0014
Mots clés
© 2024 Hui Ma et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 4.

Participant demographic findings
Age (n = 150) | - | 40.54±11.08 (n = 54) | 50.39±12.47 (n = 96) | - | −4.829 |
p < 0.001 |
Sex (n = 150) | male | 36(66.67) | 68(70.83) | 104 | 0.282 | 0.595 |
female | 18(33.33) | 28(29.17) | 46 | |||
wildtype | 17(32.08) | 69(75.82) | 86 | 26.649 | p < 0.001 | |
mutant | 36(67.92) | 22(24.18) | 58 | |||
non-codeletion | 23(51.11) | 55(85.94) | 78 | 15.746 | p < 0.001 | |
codeletion | 22(48.89) | 9(14.06) | 31 | |||
non-deletion | 38(100.00) | 20(80.00) | 58 | 5.745b | 0.017 |
|
deletion | 0(0.00) | 5(20.00) | 5 | |||
non-amplification | 8(66.67) | 45(65.22) | 53 | 0.054a | 0.817 | |
amplification | 4(33.33) | 24(34.78) | 28 | |||
chr7 gain/10 loss (n = 26) | negative | 10(83.33) | 13(92.86) | 23 | 0.552b | 0.457 |
positive | 2(16.67) | 1(7.14) | 3 | |||
Grade (n = 119) | high-grade | 6(16.22) | 70(85.37) | 76 | 52.828 | p < 0.001 |
low-grade | 31(83.78) | 12(14.63) | 43 | |||
WHO grade (n = 119) | WHO grade 2 | 26(70.27) | 4(4.88) | 30 | 62.664a | p < 0.001 |
WHO grade 3 | 5(13.51) | 8(9.76) | 13 | |||
WHO grade 4 | 6(16.22) | 70(85.37) | 76 | |||
Integrated histo-molecular diagnoses (n = 116) | Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-deleted | 17(45.95) | 7(8.86) | 24 | 41.238 | p < 0.001 |
Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant | 15(40.54) | 12(15.19) | 27 | |||
Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype | 5(13.51) | 60(75.95) | 65 |
Representative results of non-parametric tests and ROC analyses between DCE-related data for gliomas with or without pathological necrosis/imaging necrosis
Panecrosis | |||||
Tumor- |
< 0.001 | 0.824 (0.711 ~0.936) | 0.94 | 0.625 | 0.07 |
Edema- |
0.031 |
0.655 (0.527 ~ 0.783) | 0.833 | 0.46 | 0.03 |
Tumor- |
< 0.001 | 0.891 (0.788 ~ 0.995) | 0.96 | 0.833 | 0.17 |
Edema- |
0.002 |
0.728 (0.613 ~ 0.842) | 0.34 | 1 | 0.16 |
Tumor- |
< 0.001 | 0.872 (0.761 ~ 0.983) | 0.833 | 0.86 | 2.48 |
Tumor- |
< 0.001 | 0.899 (0.803 ~ 0.996) | 1 | 0.75 | 0.07 |
Imnecrosis | |||||
Tumor- |
< 0.001 | 0.856 (0.772 ~ 0.939) | 0.877 | 0.757 | 0.08 |
Tumor- |
< 0.001 | 0.929 (0.872 ~ 0.986) | 0.892 | 0.919 | 0.17 |
Edema- |
0.005 |
0.667 (0.558 ~ 0.776) | 0.708 | 0.595 | 0.06 |
Tumor- |
< 0.001 | 0.914 (0.857 ~ 0.971) | 0.946 | 0.831 | 2.74 |
Tumor- |
< 0.001 | 0.909 (0.844 ~ 0.974) | 0.8 | 0.946 | 0.13 |
Detailed clinical, imaging and pathological information of Only Imnecrosis group and Only Panecrosis group
WHO CNS grade 4 | female | 63 | 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant | |
CNS WHO grade 4 | female | 55 | 20 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype | |
CNS WHO grade 2 | female | 36 | NA | 1 | 1 | 0 | NA | NA | Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-deleted | |
NA | female | 34 | NA | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | IDH-mutation, NOS | |
CNS WHO grade 4 | male | 64 | 5 | 0 | 0 | NA | 1 | NA | Glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype | |
CNS WHO grade 2 | male | 40 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant | |
CNS WHO grade 3 | female | 55 | 60.06 | 1 | 1 | 0 | NA | NA | Oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-deleted | |
CNS WHO grade 2 | male | 26 | 5.39 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant | |
NQ | male | 40 | 7.19 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | NA | IDH-wildtype, NOS | |
NA | male | 28 | 19.68 | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | IDH-wildtype, NOS | |
CNS WHO grade 3 | male | 26 | 34.42 | 1 | 0 | 0 | NA | NA | Astrocytoma, IDH-mutant |