Accès libre

Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of bone marrow infiltration patterns in multiple myeloma for the assessment of tumor burden – a feasibility study

Xing Xiong

Xing Xiong

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Xiong, Xing
, 
Yuzhu Ma

Yuzhu Ma

Department of Radiology, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Ma, Yuzhu
, 
Yao Dai

Yao Dai

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Dai, Yao
, 
Chunhong Hu

Chunhong Hu

Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Hu, Chunhong
 et 
Yu Zhang

Yu Zhang

Department of Radiology, Dushu Lake Hospital Affiliated to Soochow UniversitySuzhou, China
Recherchez cet auteur sur
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Zhang, Yu
  
30 nov. 2023
Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements of bone marrow infiltration patterns in multiple myeloma for the assessment of tumor burden – a feasibility study's Cover Image
À propos de cet article
Article précédent
Article suivant
Citez
Télécharger la couverture
Catégorie d'article: Research Article
Publié en ligne: 30 nov. 2023
Pages: 455 - 464
Reçu: 01 juin 2023
Accepté: 22 juil. 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2023-0048
Mots clés
© 2023 Xing Xiong et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

FIGURE 1.

Five bone marrow infiltration patterns of multiple myeloma patients and healthy controls: pure diffuse pattern (A, B), combined diffuse/focal pattern (C, D), focal pattern (E, F), salt and pepper pattern (G, H), normal pattern (I, J), healthy control (K, L). T1 weighted(WI) image (A, C, E, G, I, K), T2WI FS image (B, D, F, H, J, L).
Five bone marrow infiltration patterns of multiple myeloma patients and healthy controls: pure diffuse pattern (A, B), combined diffuse/focal pattern (C, D), focal pattern (E, F), salt and pepper pattern (G, H), normal pattern (I, J), healthy control (K, L). T1 weighted(WI) image (A, C, E, G, I, K), T2WI FS image (B, D, F, H, J, L).

FIGURE 2.

ROC curve analysis of discriminating multiple myeloma (MM) infiltration patterns of D from N by quantitative parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).D = pure diffuse pattern; N = normal pattern
ROC curve analysis of discriminating multiple myeloma (MM) infiltration patterns of D from N by quantitative parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).D = pure diffuse pattern; N = normal pattern

FIGURE 3.

ROC curve analysis of discriminating multiple myeloma (MM) infiltration patterns of N from healthy controls by quantitative parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).N = normal
ROC curve analysis of discriminating multiple myeloma (MM) infiltration patterns of N from healthy controls by quantitative parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).N = normal

FIGURE 4.

ROC curve analysis of discriminating healthy controls from multiple myeloma (MM) infiltration bone marrow by quantitative parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).
ROC curve analysis of discriminating healthy controls from multiple myeloma (MM) infiltration bone marrow by quantitative parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC).

FIGURE 5.

Correlation analysis of bone marrow plasma cell ratio and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) values of diffuse infiltration patterns (N and D) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients.D = pure diffuse pattern; N = normal pattern
Correlation analysis of bone marrow plasma cell ratio and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmean) values of diffuse infiltration patterns (N and D) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients.D = pure diffuse pattern; N = normal pattern

Beta-2 microglobulin (β2-MG) characteristics of multiple myeloma (MM) patients with different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) infiltration patterns

MRI pattern β2-MGa (mg/L) P
D M F SP N
D 9.3 ± 8.8 > 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
M 10.7 ± 13.9 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
F 4.4 ± 5.2 > 0.05 > 0.05
SP 2.9 ± 1.5 > 0.05
N 3.6 ± 2.4

The laboratory data of patients

Characteristics Number / mean ± standard deviation
MM subtypea
  lgG-K 28
  lgG-λ 21
  IgA-K 8
  lgA-λ 11
  IgM-K 1
  K 5
  λ 19
ISS stagea
  I/ II/ III 18/ 48/ 27
R-ISS stagea
  I/ II/ III 14/ 63/ 16
FISHa
  HRC/SRC 20 / 73
Plasma cells in BM (%)b 34.4 ± 22.3
Serum M proteinb 36.6 ± 23.7
Hemoglobinb 93.3 ± 23.1
Serum β2-MGb 6.6 ± 8.5
Serum creatinineb 127.3 ± 143.3
LDHb 197.9 ± 115.1

Hemoglobin characteristics of multiple myeloma (MM) patients with different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) infiltration patterns

MRI pattern Haemoglobina (g/L) P
D M F SP N
D 77.0 ± 19.5 > 0.05 0.001 0.014 < 0.001
M 88.9 ± 21.1 > 0.05 > 0.05 0.009
F 100.8 ± 17.8 > 0.05 > 0.05
SP 97.6 ± 20.0 > 0.05
N 106.7 ± 23.8

Serum M protein characteristics of multiple myeloma (MM) patients with different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) infiltration patterns

MRI pattern M proteina (g/L) P
D M F SP N
D 46.9 ± 27.6 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05 < 0.05
M 49.8 ± 18.9 > 0.05 > 0.05 > 0.05
F 33.4 ± 20.8 > 0.05 > 0.05
SP 40.3 ± 18.8 < 0.05
N 19.9 ± 16.9

Plasma cells characteristics of multiple myeloma (MM) patients with different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) infiltration patterns

MRI pattern plasma cellsa (%) P
D M F SP N
D 46.9 ± 20.1 > 0.05 > 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.001
M 50.3 ± 23.1 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.001
F 34.9 ± 17.8 > 0.05 < 0.05
SP 18.8 ± 8.3 < 0.05
N 15.7 ± 11.2
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Médecine, Médecine clinique, Médecine interne, Hématologie, oncologie, Radiologie
RSS Feed de la revue