Accès libre

Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of tongue posture and its impact on articulation disorders in preschool children with anterior open bite

À propos de cet article

Citez

Figure 1

The US images of the child’s resting tongue posture on the palate: sagittal view (A) antero - posterior (transverse) view (B); vertical view (C); 3D reconstruction of the tongue showing a convexity of the tongue dorsum (D).D = Dorsum, R = Radix, T = Tip of the tongue
The US images of the child’s resting tongue posture on the palate: sagittal view (A) antero - posterior (transverse) view (B); vertical view (C); 3D reconstruction of the tongue showing a convexity of the tongue dorsum (D).D = Dorsum, R = Radix, T = Tip of the tongue

Figure 2

The US images of the child’s resting tongue posture on the floor of the mouth: sagittal view (A); anteroposterior (transverse) view (B); vertical view (C); 3D reconstruction of the tongue (D) showing a a central groove (G) on the tongue dorsum.D = Dorsum, R = Radix, T = Tip of the tongue
The US images of the child’s resting tongue posture on the floor of the mouth: sagittal view (A); anteroposterior (transverse) view (B); vertical view (C); 3D reconstruction of the tongue (D) showing a a central groove (G) on the tongue dorsum.D = Dorsum, R = Radix, T = Tip of the tongue

Figure 3

Comparison of the assessment of the resting tongue posture by the clinical orthodontic examination, clinical ENT examination, and 3DUS examination in the AOB children.
Comparison of the assessment of the resting tongue posture by the clinical orthodontic examination, clinical ENT examination, and 3DUS examination in the AOB children.

Comparison of the general data, ultrasound-assessed resting tongue posture, and the prevalence of articulation disorders between the anterior open bite group (N = 32) and the control group (N = 43)

ParameterAOB group (N = 32)Control group (N = 43)p
Male gender

For categorical variables number and percentage is given

17 (53%)20 (46%)0.571
Age (years)

for numerical mean and SD

4.9 (1.0)4.3 (0.3)< 0.001
Articulation disorder (speech therapist’s assessment)27 (84%)10 (23%)< 0.001
Improper resting tongue posture (3DUS)26 (81%)11 (26%)0.001

Comparison of the general data and the parents’ assessment of the child’s nasal breathing, the possible articulation disorders and the necessity for speech therapy between the group of children with anterior open bite (AOB) (N = 32) and the rest of the pediatric population without anterior open bite (N = 414)

ParameterAOB (N = 32)Without AOB (N = 414)P
Age (years)14.9 (1.0)5.0 (0.9)0.548
Nasal breathing, day231 (96.9%)348 (84.1%)0.056
Nasal breathing, night29 (90.6%)350 (84.5%)0.382
Articulation disorder (parental assessment)27 (84.4%)108 (26.1%)< 0.001
Necessity for speech therapy13 (40.6%)99 (23.9%)0.018
eISSN:
1581-3207
Langue:
Anglais
Périodicité:
4 fois par an
Sujets de la revue:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Radiology, Internal Medicine, Haematology, Oncology